A Review of the President's Recommendation to Develop a Nuclear Waste Repository at Yucca Mountain, Nevada


Book Description

Witnesses: Spencer Abraham, Sec., Dept. of Energy; Shelley Berkley, a Rep. in Congress from the State of Nevada; Laura Chappelle, Chairwoman, Michigan Public Service Comm.; Jared Cohon, Chmn., Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board; Joe Colvin, Pres. & CEO, Nuclear Energy Institute; Greta Dicus, Commissioner, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comm.; Jim Dushaw, Dir., Utility Dept., Internat. Brotherhood of Electrical Workers; John Ensign, a U.S. Senator from the State of Nevada; Jim Gibbons, a Rep. in Congress from the State of Nevada; Jeffrey Holmstead, Assist. Admin. for Air & Radiation, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; & Gary Jones, Dir., Natural Resources & Environment Team, General Accounting Office.







Yucca Mountain Project


Book Description




Yucca Mountain Review Plan


Book Description

The Yucca Mountain Review Plan provides guidance for the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff to evaluate a U.S. Department of Energy license application for a geologic repository. It is not a regulation and does not impose regulatory requirements. The licensing criteria are contained in the U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Title 10, Part 63 (10 CFR Part 63), “Disposal of High-Level Radioactive Wastes in a Proposed Geologic Repository at Yucca Mountain, Nevada.” The Secretary of Energy has recommended the Yucca Mountain site to the President for the development of a Yucca Mountain repository. The President has notified Congress that he considers the Yucca Mountain site qualified for application for a construction authorization for a repository. Nevada filed a notice of disapproval of the President's recommendation; however, Congress later approved the site recommendation. The U.S. Department of Energy may now submit a license application to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. The principal purpose of the Yucca Mountain Review Plan is to ensure the quality, uniformity, and consistency of U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff reviews of the license application and any requested amendments. The Yucca Mountain Review Plan has separate sections for reviews of general information, repository safety before permanent closure, repository safety after permanent closure, the research and development program to resolve safety questions, the performance confirmation program, and administrative and programmatic requirements. Each section addresses determining compliance with specific regulatory requirements from 10 CFR Part 63. The regulations and the Yucca Mountain Review Plan are risk-informed, performance-based to the extent practical.




Yucca Mountain Repository Development


Book Description




Closing Yucca Mountain


Book Description

Passed in 1982, the Nuclear Waste Policy Act (NWPA) was an effort to establish an explicit statutory basis for the Dept. of Energy (DoE) to dispose of the nation's most highly radioactive nuclear waste. The NWPA requires DoE to remove spent nuclear fuel from commercial nuclear power plants and transport it to a permanent geologic repository. In 1987, Congress designated Yucca Mountain, NV (YM), as the repository. Contents of this report: Intro.; Establishing a Permanent Geologic Repository for High-Level Nuclear Waste and Spent Nuclear Fuel; YM and the Obama Admin.; Blue Ribbon Comm. on America's Nuclear Future; Withdrawal of the YM Construction License; NRC Halts YM License Review; The Future of YM. A print on demand report.




NUCLEAR WASTE: Uncertainties about the Yucca Mountain Repository Project


Book Description

This testimony discusses the Department of Energy's (DOE) project to develop a nuclear waste repository. As required by law, DOE has been investigating a site at Yucca Mountain, Nevada, to determine its suitability for disposing of highly radioactive wastes in a mined geologic repository. On February 14, 2002, the Secretary of Energy recommended to the President approval of this site for the development of a nuclear waste repository. The next day, the President recommended approval of the site to the Congress. The President's recommendation began a statutory review process for the approval or disapproval of the site, including action by the state of Nevada, the Congress, DOE, and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) within specified time frames. If the site is approved, DOE must apply to NRC for authorization (a license) to construct a repository. If the site is not approved for a license application, or if NRC denies a license to construct a repository, the administration and the Congress will have to consider other options for the long-term management of existing and future nuclear wastes.




Nuclear Waste Disposal


Book Description

Contents: (1) Proposals for a New Direction; (2) Baseline: Current Waste Program Projections; (3) Options for Halting or Delaying Yucca Mountain: Withdraw License Application; Reduce Appropriations; Key Policy Appointments; Waste Program Review; (4) Consequences of a Yucca Mountain Policy Shift: Federal Liabilities for Disposal Delays; Licensing Complications for New Power Reactors; Environmental Cleanup Penalties; Long-Term Risk; (5) Nuclear Waste Policy: Options; Institutional Changes; Extended On-Site Storage; Federal Central Interim Storage; Private Central Storage; Spent Fuel Reprocessing and Recycling; Non-Repository Options; New Repository Site; (6) Concluding Discussion.