Economic Data: Equal Employment Opportunity Program
Author : United States. Bureau of Reclamation
Publisher :
Page : 552 pages
File Size : 11,22 MB
Release : 1972
Category : Discrimination in employment
ISBN :
Author : United States. Bureau of Reclamation
Publisher :
Page : 552 pages
File Size : 11,22 MB
Release : 1972
Category : Discrimination in employment
ISBN :
Author : United States. Bureau of Reclamation
Publisher :
Page : 284 pages
File Size : 37,18 MB
Release : 1968
Category : Construction industry
ISBN :
Author : Emory W. Lockette
Publisher :
Page : 194 pages
File Size : 30,12 MB
Release : 1966
Category : Affirmative action programs
ISBN :
Author : United States. Superintendent of Documents
Publisher :
Page : 1348 pages
File Size : 19,20 MB
Release : 1970
Category : United States
ISBN :
Author : United States. Superintendent of Documents
Publisher :
Page : 992 pages
File Size : 11,13 MB
Release : 1977
Category : Government publications
ISBN :
February issue includes Appendix entitled Directory of United States Government periodicals and subscription publications; September issue includes List of depository libraries; June and December issues include semiannual index
Author :
Publisher :
Page : 1388 pages
File Size : 16,72 MB
Release :
Category : Government publications
ISBN :
Author : United States Civil Service Commission. Library
Publisher :
Page : 144 pages
File Size : 36,98 MB
Release : 1972
Category : Discrimination in employment
ISBN :
Author : David Golland
Publisher : University Press of Kentucky
Page : 280 pages
File Size : 41,80 MB
Release : 2011-04-22
Category : History
ISBN : 0813129982
Between 1965, when President Lyndon B. Johnson defined affirmative action as a legitimate federal goal, and 1972, when President Richard M. Nixon named one of affirmative action’s chief antagonists the head of the Department of Labor, government officials at all levels addressed racial economic inequality in earnest. Providing members of historically disadvantaged groups an equal chance at obtaining limited and competitive positions, affirmative action had the potential to alienate large numbers of white Americans, even those who had viewed school desegregation and voting rights in a positive light. Thus, affirmative action was—and continues to be—controversial. Novel in its approach and meticulously researched, David Hamilton Golland’s Constructing Affirmative Action: The Struggle for Equal Employment Opportunity bridges a sizeable gap in the literature on the history of affirmative action. Golland examines federal efforts to diversify the construction trades from the 1950s through the 1970s, offering valuable insights into the origins of affirmative action–related policy. Constructing Affirmative Action analyzes how community activism pushed the federal government to address issues of racial exclusion and marginalization in the construction industry with programs in key American cities.
Author :
Publisher :
Page : 542 pages
File Size : 40,21 MB
Release : 1969
Category : Civil service
ISBN :
Author : National Research Council
Publisher : National Academies Press
Page : 129 pages
File Size : 10,41 MB
Release : 2013-03-01
Category : Political Science
ISBN : 0309264111
U.S. agencies with responsibilities for enforcing equal employment opportunity laws have long relied on detailed information that is obtained from employers on employment in job groups by gender and race/ethnicity for identifying the possibility of discriminatory practices. The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), the Office of Federal Contract Compliance programs of the U.S. Department of Labor, and the Civil Rights Division of the U.S. Department of Justice have developed processes that use these employment data as well as other sources of information to target employers for further investigation and to perform statistical analysis that is used in enforcing the anti-discrimination laws. The limited data from employers do not include (with a few exceptions) the ongoing measurement of possible discrimination in compensation. The proposed Paycheck Fairness Act of 2009 would have required EEOC to issue regulations mandating that employers provide the EEOC with information on pay by the race, gender, and national origin of employees. The legislation was not enacted. If the legislation had become law, the EEOC would have been required to confront issues regarding currently available and potential data sources, methodological requirements, and appropriate statistical techniques for the measurement and collection of employer pay data. The panel concludes that the collection of earnings data would be a significant undertaking for the EEOC and that there might be an increased reporting burden on some employers. Currently, there is no clearly articulated vision of how the data on wages could be used in the conduct of the enforcement responsibilities of the relevant agencies. Collecting Compensation Data from Employers gives recommendations for targeting employers for investigation regarding their compliance with antidiscrimination laws.