Pre-Contractual Liability in English and French Law


Book Description

This book examines the nature of pre-contractual liability in English and French law, focusing on the difficult, but practically important, question of liability for services performed in anticipation of a contract.




Precontractual Liability under the Portuguese, German and French Legal Systems


Book Description

Seminar paper from the year 2020 in the subject Law - Comparative Legal Systems, Comparative Law, grade: 15/20, , language: English, abstract: On a daily basis, contracts are concluded between natural or legal persons. Therefore, many legal subjects have to enter into the precontractual phase of negotiations that eventually lead to a conclusion or a failure of the treaty. As first outlined by Jhering in 18611, the precontractual phase can establish a legal relationship in which precontractual obligations have to be respected. In the following, the precontractual liability under the German, French and Portuguese law will be compared. After an analysis of the historical origin of the precontractual liability in general and the presentation of the historical developments in Germany, France and Portugal, the legal problem, that needs a regulation in the legal orders, will be defined. Furthermore, in the com-parison of the regulatory framework, the similarities and differences of the current legislations in the three states will be examined based on various criteria such as the legal basis, the concrete precontractual duties and the relevance of the good faith. Apart from comparing compensable damages, the legal institutes in those states will be classified. Before summing up the compar-ison of the roots and the legal institute by also including a grid of the main comparative aspects, important cases will be presented to understand the development of the precontractual liability in Germany, France and Portugal.







Precontractual Liability in European Private Law


Book Description

This volume outlines European perspectives on the liability which may follow a break-off of precontractual negotiations.




The Interaction of Contract Law and Tort and Property Law in Europe


Book Description

Against the background of the creation of an EU-wide frame of reference for private law relevant to the Common Market, this study, which was requested by the EU Commission, analyses the dovetailing between contract and tort law on the one hand, and between contract and property law on the other. The study examines the legal orders of almost all the Member States of the EU, illustrates the differences between contractual and non-contractual liability and evaluates the different systems of the transfer of property, of movable and immovable securities as well as trust law. The study comes to the conclusion that the intensive considerations on the creation of a model-law in the area of European private law do not allow these thoughts to be limited to contract law. Such a limitation to the scope of the regarding of this area would probably cause more problems than it would solve, or at any rate not do justice to the needs of the Common Market.




French Civil Liability in Comparative Perspective


Book Description

The French law of torts or of extra-contractual liability is widely seen as exceptional. For long it was based on a mere five articles of the Civil Code of 1804, but on this foundation the courts and legal scholars have constructed liabilities for fault and strict liability of an extraordinary breadth and significance. While the rest of the general law of obligations (including contract) in the Civil Code was reformed in 2016 by executive ordonnance, this area was left aside, being the subject in 2017 of a proposal by the French Government for the legislative reform of the law of civil liability, a new legislative category to include both contractual and extra-contractual liability. This work considers important aspects of this developing area of French law in a series of essays by French lawyers and comparative lawyers working in French law and other civil law systems. In doing so, it provides insight into the doctrinal thinking and judgments of French lawyers as well as the possible directions in which this area of the law may be developed in the future.










An International Restatement of Contract Law


Book Description

The Unidroit Principles of International Contracts, first published in 1994, have met with extraordinary success in the legal and business community worldwide. Prepared by a group of eminent experts from all major legal systems of the world, they provide a comprehensive set of rules for international commercial contracts. Available in more than 20 language versions, they are increasingly being used by national legislatures as a source of inspiration in law reform projects, by lawyers as guidelines in contract negotiations and by arbitrators as a legal basis for the settlement of disputes. In 2004 a new edition of the Unidroit Principles was approved, containing five new chapters and adaptations to take into account electronic contracting. This new edition of An International Restatement of Contract Law is the first comprehensive introduction to the Unidroit Principles 2004. In addition, it provides an extensive survey and analysis of the actual use of the Unidroit Principles in practice with special emphasis on the different ways in which they have been interpreted and applied by the courts and arbitral tribunals in the hundred or so cases reported worldwide. The book also contains the full text of the Preamble and the 180 articles of the Unidroit Principles 2004 in Chinese, English, French, German, Italian and Russian as well as the 1994 edition in Spanish. Published under the Transnational Publishers imprint.




Good Faith and Pre-Contractual Liability in Commercial Contracts


Book Description

The principle of good faith has always governed commercial relationships in civil law countries. However, the correct application and limits of this principle have always been debated. This paper firstly analyses how bona fide is interpreted in Italian contract law, concluding that it aims to preserve the utility of contracts and, unlike ordinary diligence, requires both parties to make a reasonable sacrifice to keep the contract alive. Secondly, the correct classification of culpa in contrahendo within the Italian legal framework is discussed. After considering different points of view, the paper discusses the most recent Italian Supreme Court's decisions, which classify the culpa in contrahendo as a contractual liability arising from “qualified social contact”.For comparative purposes, the analysis then focuses on the presence of good faith requirements in English law. While recognising the absence of a general principle of bona fide, this paper suggests that many remedies in English law often result in the same outcomes. Also, even if English Courts have consistently refused to affirm a good faith requirement in the negotiation stage of contracts (i.e., a culpa in contrahendo), parties are still protected by other means. In this sense, the paper concludes that the two legal systems are not as different as they appear at first sight and affirming that English law does not require parties to act in good faith could be misleading and not entirely correct.