Report to the Legislature
Author :
Publisher :
Page : 15 pages
File Size : 22,18 MB
Release : 1980
Category : Cycling
ISBN :
Author :
Publisher :
Page : 15 pages
File Size : 22,18 MB
Release : 1980
Category : Cycling
ISBN :
Author :
Publisher :
Page : pages
File Size : 17,7 MB
Release : 1979
Category : Bicycle trails
ISBN :
Author :
Publisher :
Page : 50 pages
File Size : 31,56 MB
Release : 1990
Category : Bicycle trails
ISBN :
Author :
Publisher :
Page : 10 pages
File Size : 42,77 MB
Release : 2003
Category :
ISBN :
Author : California. Division of Transportation Planning
Publisher :
Page : pages
File Size : 39,24 MB
Release : 1976
Category :
ISBN :
Author :
Publisher :
Page : 32 pages
File Size : 29,17 MB
Release : 1975
Category : Bicycle trails
ISBN :
Author :
Publisher :
Page : pages
File Size : 12,19 MB
Release : 1980
Category : Bicycle trails
ISBN :
Author :
Publisher :
Page : 36 pages
File Size : 44,63 MB
Release : 1974
Category : Bicycle trails
ISBN :
Author :
Publisher :
Page : 58 pages
File Size : 34,16 MB
Release : 2002
Category : Bicycle trails
ISBN :
Author : United States. General Accounting Office
Publisher :
Page : 60 pages
File Size : 34,83 MB
Release : 1996
Category : Bicycle trails
ISBN :
At least 10% of the 24 billion dollars, 6-year authorization in the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 (ISTEA) that created the surface transportation program was required to be set aside exclusively for 10 categories of "transportation enhancements", or projects designed to strengthen the cultural, aesthetic, or environmental aspects of transportation or to encourage greater use of nonmotorized transportation. In examining this set-aside, the General Accounting Office (GAO) addressed the following questions: (1) How do the obligation rates for transportation enhancement funds for fiscal years 1992-95 compare with the obligation rates for other major highway programs? (2) How do the obligation rates for transportation enhancement funds vary by state, and what factors have affected the states' use of these funds? (3) What types of projects are being funded with transportation enhancement funds? and (4) What are stakeholders' views on reauthorizing the transportation enhancement set-aside?