The Ambivalence of Imperial Discourse


Book Description

A new reading of Miguel de Cervantes' play 'La Destrucción de Numancia' (c. 1583), analysing the work in relation to theories of empire in 16th century Spain, in the context of plays written immediately before the rise in popularity of Lope de Vega and the comedia nueva, and the playwright's innovative use of dramatic techniques.







Discourses of Empire


Book Description

This inventive work explores Mark’s Gospel within the contexts of the empires of Rome and Europe. In a unique dual analysis, the book highlights how empire is not only part of the past but also of a present colonial heritage. The book first outlines postcolonial criticism and discusses the challenges it poses for biblical scholarship, then scrutinizes the complex ways with which nineteenth-century commentaries on Mark’s Gospel interplayed with the formation of European colonial identities. It examines the stance of Mark’s Gospel vis-à-vis the Roman Empire and analyzes the manner in which the fibers of empire within Mark are interwoven, reproduced, negotiated, modified and subverted. Finally, it offers synthesizing suggestions for bringing Mark beyond a colonial heritage. The book’s candid use of postcolonial criticism illustrates how a contemporary perspective can illuminate and shed new light on an ancient text in its imperial setting.




Tensions of Empire


Book Description

"Carrying the inquiry into zones previous itineraries have typically avoided—the creation of races, sexual relations, invention of tradition, and regional rulers' strategies for dealing with the conquerors—the book brings out features of European expansion and contraction we have not seen well before."—Charles Tilly, The New School for Social Research "What is important about this book is its commitment to shaping theory through the careful interpretation of grounded, empirically-based historical and ethnographic studies. . . . By far the best collection I have seen on the subject."—Sherry B. Ortner, Columbia University




Post-Colonial Studies: The Key Concepts


Book Description

First Published in 2000. Routledge is an imprint of Taylor & Francis, an informa company.




Ambivalence in the Colonized Subject


Book Description

This study comprises a comparative analysis of the counter-discourse of the Cuban poet-slave, Juan Francisco Manzano, and the Irish writer and historian, Richard Robert Madden, who championed the rights of Blacks in Jamaica and Cuba. Key figures in the history and literature of their respective countries, their literary and historical contributions have not received critical attention from the standpoint of postcolonial theory. Focussing on ambivalence, a feature of the colonized subject's discourse, this contrapuntal analysis reveals a distinct convergence in the interaction of these figures with nineteenth-century imperial culture. Drawing on primary research conducted at Leabhairlann Náisiúnta na héireann, (the National Library of Ireland) the Royal Irish Academy in Dublin, the Biblioteca Nacional José Marti (National Library) in Havana, Cuba, and using postcolonial theory as methodological framework, the analysis recuperates voices drowned out by the colonial enterprise, and may be viewed as an attempt to extend current modes of postcoloniality. Chapter One sets out the general methodological framework based on postcolonial theory. Chapter Two provides the historical perspective to nineteenth-century imperialism as imposed on Cuba and Ireland. Chapter Three investigates the complexity of identity for subjects of religio-racial oppression. Chapter Four examines resistance, where the experience of the Cuban slave parallels that of the indigenous Irish subject; the emancipation phase is viewed in relation to the struggles of Frederick Douglass and Daniel O'Connell. Chapter Five concludes the work with a synthesis of Madden and Manzano's counter-discursive strategies vis à vis the legacy of colonialism in their respective countries.




Ambivalent Nation


Book Description

In Ambivalent Nation, Hugh Dubrulle explores how Britons envisioned the American Civil War and how these conceptions influenced their discussions about race, politics, society, military affairs, and nationalism. Contributing new research that expands upon previous scholarship focused on establishing British public opinion toward the war, Dubrulle offers a methodical dissection of the ideological forces that shaped that opinion, many of which arose from the complex Anglo-American postcolonial relationship. Britain’s lingering feeling of ownership over its former colony contributed heavily to its discussions of the American Civil War. Because Britain continued to have a substantial material interest in the United States, its writers maintained a position of superiority and authority in respect to American affairs. British commentators tended to see the United States as divided by two distinct civilizations, even before the onset of war: a Yankee bourgeois democracy and a southern oligarchy supported by slavery. They invariably articulated mixed feelings toward both sections, and shortly before the Civil War, the expression of these feelings was magnified by the sudden emergence of inexpensive newspapers, periodicals, and books. The conflicted nature of British attitudes toward the United States during the antebellum years anticipates the ambivalence with which the British reacted to the American crisis in 1861. Britons used prewar stereotypes of northerners and southerners to help explain the course and significance of the conflict. Seen in this fashion, the war seemed particularly relevant to a number of questions that occupied British conversations during this period: the characteristics and capacities of people of African descent, the proper role of democracy in society and politics, the future of armed conflict, and the composition of a durable nation. These questions helped shape Britain’s stance toward the war and, in turn, the war informed British attitudes on these subjects. Dubrulle draws from numerous primary sources to explore the rhetoric and beliefs of British public figures during these years, including government papers, manuscripts from press archives, private correspondence, and samplings from a variety of dailies, weeklies, monthlies, and quarterlies. The first book to examine closely the forces that shaped British public opinion about the Civil War, Ambivalent Nation contextualizes and expands our understanding of British attitudes during this tumultuous period.




Milton's Imperial Epic


Book Description

Written during the crucial first phase of English empire-building in the New World, Paradise Lost registers the radically divided attitudes toward the settlement of America that existed in seventeenth-century Protestant England. Evans looks at the relationship between Milton's epic and the pervasive colonial discourse of Milton's time. Evans bases his analysis on the literature of exploration and colonialism. The primary sources on which he draws range from sermons about the New World justifying colonization and exhorting virtue among colonists to promotional pamphlets designed to lure people and investment into the colonies. Evans's research allows him to create a richly textured picture of anxiety and optimism, guilt and moral certitude. The central question is whether Milton supported England's colonization or covertly attempted to subvert it. In contrast to those who attribute to Paradise Lost a specific political agenda for the American colonies, Evans maintains that Milton reflects the complexity and ambivalence of attitudes held by English society. Analyzing Paradise Lost against this background, Evans offers a new perspective on such fundamental issues as the narrator's shifting stance in the poem, the unique character of Milton's prelapsarian paradise, and the moral and intellectual status of Adam and Eve before and after the fall. From Satan's arrival in Hell to the expulsion from the garden of Eden, Milton's version of the Genesis myth resonates with the complex thematics of Renaissance colonialism.




Not Enough Said


Book Description

As this discussion intends to show, however, the validity of such a relationship cannot be contested on the basis of 'subversive' or 'sympathetic' accounts of Orientalists, since such accounts can often maintain their associations with discourses of power even in times of confusion and insecurity. One ultimate objective of this study of ambivalence is to discourage conventional and binaristic critical approaches that, either from a sheer desire for categorisation or an utter misunderstanding of Said's thesis, have tended to divide writers on the Orient into pro- and anti-imperialists. Orientalist narratives, as this thesis argues, are generally too conflicted to be neatly fitted into either the 'for' or 'against' column with regard to nineteenth-century British imperialism.




Rethinking Postcolonialism


Book Description

Acheraiou challenges postcolonial discourse analysis and proposes a new model of interpretation that resituates the historical, ideological and conceptual denseness of the Colonial idea. He questions key issues, including hybridity, Otherness and territoriality, and expands the postcolonial field by introducing ground-breaking theoretical concepts.