An Investigation Into Using Rammed Stone Columns for the Improvement of a South African Silty Clay


Book Description

Ground improvement is the term used to describe the act of modifying the soil properties in geotechnical engineering. It is often required when the existing ground conditions do not meet the requirements for a construction project. The technique of improving the ground are many and they usually aim at reducing settlement, increasing bearing capacity, mitigating liquefaction, improving drainage, retaining unstable soils or remediating contaminated soils. Among these techniques, stone column technology which was pioneered in the 1950s' aimed at improving both cohesive soils and silty sands. Although the technique has been used successfully in many advanced countries, its application in South Africa is minimal. This limited use is associated with a lack of research, instrumented case studies and design specifications pertaining to local ground conditions. In this investigation, the behaviour of rammed stone columns installed in a South African clay (sourced from District Six in Cape Town) was studied through extensive laboratory tests conducted in a specifically designed rectangular wooden tank. A testing programme was established whereby the majority of the tests were conducted on the local clay, with a few performed on Kaolin for comparison purposes. The effect of moisture content (OMC, LL and 1.2LL) of the base soil specimen, the column diameter (50 mm, 70 mm and 100 mm) and the column material (Klipheuwel sand, Cape Flats sand and crushed aggregate) on the normal compressive stress applied up to a settlement of 50 mm were studied. The vertical stresses and settlements were recorded electronically and analysed. Results indicated an increase in vertical applied stress with a simultaneous reduction in settlement when improving Cape Town clay with rammed stone columns. The in-depth analysis showed that the vertical bearing stresses were generally higher with larger columns, irrespective of the column material and the moisture content of the base soil.




Proceedings of the First Southern African Geotechnical Conference


Book Description

The First Southern African Geotechnical Conference was organised by the Geotechnical Division of the South African Institution of Civil Engineering (SAICE) under the auspices of the International Society of Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering (ISSMGE) and took place at Sun City, South Africa on 5 and 6 May 2016. More than 60 papers were rec




From Research to Practice in Rammed Aggregate Piers


Book Description

Stone columns have been used since the 1950's as a technique for soil improvement such as cohesive soils and silty cohesion less soils. Stone column s applications includes (1) stabilizing the foundation soils to support embankments, approach fills and reconstruction work on weak cohesive soils, (2) supporting retaining structures (including Reinforced Earth), bridge bent and abutment structures on slightly marginal soft to stiff clays and loose silty sands, (3) landslide stabilization and (4) reducing liquefaction potential of clean sands. Also, stone columns under proper conditions may be greatly decrease the time required for primary consolidation. The stone column technique of ground behavior has proven successful in (1) improving slope stability of both embankments and natural slopes, (2) increasing bearing capacity, (3) reducing total and differential settlements, (4) reducing the liquefaction potential of sands and (5) increasing the time rate of settlement. Stone column construction involves the partial replacement of unsuitable subsurface soils with a compacted vertical column of stone that usually completely penetrates the weak strata.




Design and Construction of Stone Columns


Book Description

"Stone columns have been used since the 1950's as a technique for improving both cohesive soils and silty sands. Potential applications include (1) stabilizing foundation soils to support embankments and approach fills, (2), supporting retaining structures (including Reinforced Earth), bridge bent and abutment structures on slightly marginal soft to stiff clays and loose silty sands, (3) landslide stabilization and (4) reducing liquefaction potential of clean sands. Also, stone columns under proper conditions can greatly decrease the time required for primary consolidation. The report describes construction, field inspection, and design aspects of stone columns. Also, several case histories are described. Bearing capacity, settlement and stability design examples are given in the appendixes contained in Volume II, (FHWA/RD-83/027) as follows: Appendix A - Selected Contacts for Stone Columns, Appendix B - Local Bearing Failure of an Isolated Stone Column, Appendix C - Example Bearing Capacity Problems, Appendix D - Example Settlement Problems, Appendix E - Example Stability Problem, Appendix F - Rammed Franki Stone and Sand Columns"--Technical report documentation page.




Influence of smear and compaction zones on the performance of stone columns in lacustrine clay


Book Description

Construction on soft soils is always accompanied by the risk of significant, time-dependent settlement and bearing capacity failure. As technical knowledge has advanced, optimised ground improvement has offered significant economic advantages in reducing net settlement and resisting failure by installation of more flexible and cost-effective stone columns or sand compaction piles in the ground, rather than more rigid inclusions such as steel or concrete piles. The stiffness and strength of the subsoil around the columns is greater, and the consolidation time is reduced through shorter (radial) drainage paths.







An Investigation Into Ground Improvement Using Geogrid Encased Stone Columns


Book Description

Conventional stone columns are commonly used as a form of ground improvement in soft soils, for the support of lightly and moderately loaded structures such as embankments. However, their use in very soft and extremely soft soils is limited by the low stiffness and minimal confinement provided by the soft soil. To extend their use to such soft soils, a method of geotextile encasement has recently been developed, providing additional circumferential confinement. The technique has been used on numerous projects throughout Europe and more recently in South America. Although geotextile encasement provides a practical form of ground improvement, its use can be limited in some cases by excessive settlements, resulting from the adopted materials and installation practices. To investigate the potential benefits of using a stiffer encasement than geotextile (and to broaden the appeal of geosynthetics in ground improvement), the use of geogrid encasement is investigated.The research presented in this thesis was used to investigate practical aspects of geogrid encasement including developing effective and efficient methods of encasement construction and assessment of encased column performance. The research was undertaken using a four-stage approach comprising small-scale laboratory testing, numerical simulation of small-scale tests, medium-scale laboratory testing and scaled-up numerical modelling of full-scale columns. Small-scale testing was undertaken on isolated and simulated group columns to investigate whether the full-length of the column needed to be encased, the impact of geogrid stiffness and methods of constructing the encasement. Numerical modelling was undertaken using the PLAXIS software package and was initially used to reproduce the small-scale test results. Following this, the models were scaled up to investigate the impact of different parameters on full-scale encased column behaviour. Medium-scale testing of unconfined columns was used to investigate methods of encasement construction including the suitability of different geogrids and stone column aggregates.The research indicates that geogrid encasement can be constructed at relatively low cost and most effectively by constructing sleeves with a full circumference of overlap, fixed in position using cable ties. The technique relies on interlock between the overlapped section of geogrid and protruding aggregate to provide a level of fixity similar to welding. Biaxial geogrids provide the stiffest and most reliable encasement material, particularly when used with typical stone column aggregates.Based on the results of modelling and testing, geogrid encased columns are expected to reduce untreated settlements by between 50% and 95%, depending on properties such as geogrid stiffness, column density, soil stiffness and encased length. By progressively increasing the replacement ratio, geogrid stiffness and the encased length of a column, the stiffness of the treated soil mass may be steadily increased. Although the research indicates that geogrid encasement is likely to provide a stiffer alternative to geotextile, site testing is recommended to confirm some aspects of performance, including installation techniques.




Liquefaction Mitigation in Silty Soils Using Stone Columns Supplemented with Wick Drains


Book Description

Vibro replacement stone columns are in use to mitigate liquefaction hazards in sandy soils for almost three decades. There are three mechanisms that help reduce liquefaction potential of a sandy soil improved using stone columns. During stone column installation sandy soils densify due to installation vibration. Further, the stiffness of the composite improved soil increases leading to a reduction in cyclic shear stress induced on the soil surrounding the stone columns during earthquakes. In addition, pore pressures generated in the soil during earthquakes are quickly dissipated through the highly permeable stone columns. These combined mechanisms reduce the liquefaction potential of the improved soil. Sandy soil sites improved using stone columns have performed well during earthquakes. However, its effectiveness in silty soils is limited. Recent case histories show stone columns supplemented with wick drains work well in such soils. This study focuses on three aspects: (i) examining the reasons for the sub-performance of stone columns in silty soils, identifying key soil parameters that hinder the effectiveness of stone columns, and developing means to improve the effectiveness of this method in silty soils including provision of supplementary wick drains, (ii) developing a numerical model to simulate stone column installation with and without wick drains, and qualitatively evaluate the degree of ground improvement, and (iii) verifying the numerical simulation results using case histories and field experimental studies, and developing modified design charts and guidelines for designing stone columns with and without wick drains to improve sands and silty soils. Pore pressure generation, post-liquefaction dissipation, and densification characteristics of an artificial silty soil and three natural silty soils were experimentally studied and compared with sand. A careful analysis of such data indicates that liquefaction characteristics of silty soils and sands are not very different when compared using grain contact density indices as the basis for comparison. However, post-liquefaction dissipation characteristics are very much dependent on grain size characteristics. Low coefficient of consolidation associated with silty soils precludes faster pore pressure dissipation during stone column installation and therefore hinders densification around the stone columns during installation. It also hinders drainage during earthquakes. This appears to be the primary reason for the lack of effectiveness of stone columns in silty soils. Numerical studies of pore pressure behavior of silty and sandy soils support this view. Based on the experimental results, a numerical model was developed to simulate the stone column installation process. During installation, pore pressure generated due to the vibratory energy imparted into the surrounding ground was estimated, and the ground densification associated with pore pressure dissipation was calculated. Several simulations were done for sands and silty soils with varying initial conditions improved using stone columns with and without wick drains. The model was fine tuned and tested using case studies and field measurements. Design charts and design guidelines that were developed based on the extensive experimental and numerical study are presented. Recommendations for improving the stone column design methodology, and for further research in this subject are presented as well.




Stone Columns and Reinforced Stone Columns As Soil Improvement Techniques


Book Description

Stone columns have been used since the 1950's as a technique for soil improvement such as cohesive soils and silty cohesion less soils. Stone column's applications includes (1) stabilizing the foundation soils to support embankments, approach fills and reconstruction work on weak cohesive soils, (2) supporting retaining structures (including Reinforced Earth), bridge bent and abutment structures on slightly marginal soft to stiff clays and loose silty sands, (3) landslide stabilization and (4) reducing liquefaction potential of clean sands. Also, stone columns under proper conditions may be greatly decrease the time required for primary consolidation. The stone column technique of ground behavior has proven successful in (1) improving slope stability of both embankments and natural slopes, (2) increasing bearing capacity, (3) reducing total and differential settlements, (4) reducing the liquefaction potential of sands and (5) increasing the time rate of settlement. Stone column construction involves the partial replacement of unsuitable subsurface soils with a compacted vertical column of stone that usually completely penetrates the weak strata.




Performance of Stone Columns in Cohesive Soil


Book Description

Stone columns are widely used and generally considered to be one of the most cost-effective and environmental-friendly soil improvement technique for highways and embankments. They are also used as drainage to reduce the consolidation period, which accordingly increases the bearing capacity, reduces settlement, and reduces the liquefaction potential. Current design theories used to estimate the bearing capacity of a group of stone columns are based on the unit cell or homogenized material concepts, which neglect the effect of the column interactions and installation technique. This thesis therefore presents an experimental investigation, together with numerical modelling, to examine the performance of a single stone column and group of stone columns subjected to vertical loading. An analytical model is developed to capture the effect of an arrangement of stone columns and the mode of failure within a column and the surrounding soft clay material. A single stone column and a group of stone columns were investigated in a large-scale experimental set-up. The testing program was divided into four steps: (a) filling the testing tank with the clay, (b) installing the stone columns in the clay bed, (c) extracting samples of the reinforced soil (a block of stone columns surrounded by the soft clay loading), and (d) testing the samples in a triaxial apparatus. The results showed that the mode of failure of the reinforced soil depends on the column spacing and the strength of the column materials and the surrounding soil. Numerically, a 3-D finite element model was developed to examine the influence of the governing parameters on the bearing capacity of the group. The model was validated against experimental results from this study and results available in the literature. The numerical model was used to simulate the actual driving process during installation of the columns. The model was then used to predict the actual failure plane under a rigid footing reinforced by stone columns for a given geometry/soil condition. An analytical model was developed utilizing the actual failure plane deduced from the numerical model to develop a theory to predict the bearing capacity of the reinforced soil. The theory developed was validated against the results obtained from the numerical model and results reported in the literature.