Analysis of Full-scale Mechanically Stabilized Earth (mse) Wall Using Crimped Steel Wire Reinforcement


Book Description

Mechanically Stabilized Earth (MSE) walls have provided an effective solution to constructing retaining walls. The engineering and construction industry is continually striving to provide more cost-effective and design-efficient means to building MSE walls. Hilfiker Retaining Walls has developed a new semi-extensible metal mat reinforcement technology which does not fit into the current extensible or inextensible categories as defined by regulating authorities. The objective of this project was to construct and observe the behavior collect quantitative data for a 20-foot tall MSE wall using the prototype semi-extensible reinforcement technology. The results were compared to expected American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials Load Reduction Factored Design values and was also compared to another case study, Prediction of Reinforcement Loads in Reinforced Soil Walls as conducted by Tony M. Allen, P.E., and Richard J. Bathurst, Ph. D., P. Eng. Comparing the behavior of the 20-foot prototype MSE wall to these design regulations and case studies allowed for proper classification and will facilitate future industry design efforts.




Interaction Between Drilled Shaft and Mechanically Stabilized Earth (MSE) Wall


Book Description

Drilled shafts are being constructed within the reinforced zone of mechanically stabilized earth (MSE) walls especially in the case of overpass bridges where the drilled shafts carry the bridge deck or traffic signs. The interaction between the drilled shaft and the MSE wall is not well known and not typically incorporated into the design. As part of the research project, a full-scale test was conducted in 2012 at Texas A&M University. The test was performed on an MSE wall where the backfill material was clean sand and the soil reinforcement was made of metal strips. Also two real projects w ere instrumented during construction, and data were gathered for one year. A numerical model was used and calibrated against the results of the three full-scale cases. Then a sensitivity analysis was performed and 64 numerical cases were modeled to understand the effect of different parameters on the interaction between the MSE wall and the drilled shaft. The data from the simulations, the full-scale test results, and the monitoring of the real site were processed, and a modification of the current guidelines was proposed for the case where there is a drilled shaft subjected to a horizontal load in the reinforced zone of the MSE wall. A design chart is presented to take into account the addidtional pressure on the wall created by the drilled shaft.




Alternative Steel Reinforcement in Mechanically Stabilized Earth (MSE) Walls


Book Description

Mechanically Stabilize Earth (MSE) is a method in which soil tensile strength and shear resistance is increased by using reinforcement. The traditional forms of reinforcement include bars, galvanized strips, welded wire mats or steel grids, and geosynthetics.When steel is used as reinforcement in MSE walls, it gets corroded or decayed. Certain shapes of reinforcement will have less corrosion because less surface area is exposed. Pullout resistance is the ability to resist a tensile force. This can be affected by the design and shape of the steel. This study simulates different overburden depths or pressures for pullout resistance and evaluates standard corrosion rates.










Field Monitoring of Mechanically Stabilized Earth Walls to Investigate Secondary Reinforcement Effects


Book Description

Mechanically stabilized earth (MSE) walls have been commonly used in highway construction. AASHTO (2007) has detailed design procedures for such a wall system. In the current AASHTO design, only primary reinforcements are used in relatively large spacing (commonly 2 feet), which requires higher connection strength between reinforcements and wall facing. Large spacing between reinforcements may also increase the chances of wall facing bulging and construction-related problems. To alleviate such problems, the use of secondary reinforcements installed between primary reinforcements was proposed. The use of secondary reinforcements could (1) reduce the required connection load for primary reinforcement, (2) increase the internal stability by secondary reinforcement, (3) improve the compaction near the wall facing, and (4) mitigate the down-drag behind the wall facing. However, this idea was not verified in practice. To improve the understanding of the performance of MSE walls with secondary reinforcement and verify its benefits in practice, three MSE wall sections reinforced with geogrids were constructed and monitored in the field: (1) an MSE wall section with uniaxial geogrids as primary and secondary reinforcements, (2) an MSE wall section with uniaxial geogrids as primary reinforcements and with biaxial geogrids as secondary reinforcements, and (3) an MSE wall section with uniaxial geogrids as primary reinforcements only (i.e., the control section). Earth pressure cells, inclinometer pipes and a probe, and foil-type strain gauges were used in these three test wall sections to measure the vertical and lateral earth pressures, lateral wall facing deflections, and strains of primary and secondary geogrids, respectively. The measured results (i.e., the wall facing deflections, the vertical and horizontal earth pressures, and the strains of geogrids) were compared with those calculated using AASHTO (2007). Based on the analysis of the field test results, major conclusions can be drawn in the following: (1) the secondary reinforcements reduced the wall facing deflections as compared with those in the control section; (2) the measured vertical earth pressures were close to the computed trapezoid stresses and increased with the construction of the wall; (3) the distribution of the measured lateral earth pressures in the control section linearly increased with depth, while the distributions of the measured lateral earth pressures in the sections with secondary reinforcements were approximately uniform with depth; (4) the measured tensile strains at the connection in all sections were small; and (5) secondary reinforcements reduced the maximum tensile strains in the primary geogrids.




Assessing Corrosion of MSE Wall Reinforcement


Book Description

The primary objective of this study was to extract reinforcement coupons from select MSE walls and document the extent of corrosion. A secondary objective of this project was to develop and assess techniques for removal of coupons on two-stage MSE walls.




Characterization of Reinforced Fill Soil, Soil-reinforcement Interaction, and Internal Stability of Very Tall MSE Walls


Book Description

In many geotechnical design situations involving tight right-of-way constraints, Mechanically Stabilized Earth (MSE) walls are often the most cost-effective and reliable earth retention technology among available alternatives. However, few well-documented case histories with detailed material testing, instrumentation programs and construction observation of performance are available in the literature. Despite the small number of case histories, empirical design methods are used in place of more theoretically-based methods. As a result, current design methods for MSE walls result in a large amount of inaccuracy, especially when their empirical calibration limits are exceeded. This study characterizes the constitutive behavior of a sandy gravel backfill soil and ribbed steel strip reinforcement material used in the construction of two very tall MSE walls constructed during the 3rd Runway Expansion Project at the Seattle-Tacoma International Airport (SeaTac). Tension testing was performed on coupons cut from the reinforcement material in order to measure its Young's modulus and yield strength. Consolidated drained triaxial strength testing was performed to measure the stress-strain behavior of the loose, medium dense, and densely-compacted backfill materials. Then the frictional interaction between the reinforcement and densely-compacted backfill soil was evaluated by performing twenty full-scale single-strip laboratory pullout tests. Using the results from the material testing and in-situ reinforcement strain measurements taken at the SeaTac MSE walls, the accuracy of four reinforcement load prediction methods was evaluated. The pullout test results were used to develop a backfill-specific design model, as well as being combined with other pullout test results for gravels reported in the literature to develop a global gravel design model for predicting peak reinforcement pullout resistances. These newly developed pullout design models were compared to the current AASHTO design model and found to produce much more accurate predictions of peak reinforcement pullout resistance. Walls designed and constructed with the kinds of backfill evaluated herein and with the new models generated will be more cost-effective than typically accepted design models.