Cases Decided During the Sessions, 1885-6-7-8-9, by the Court of Referees on Private Bills in Parliament


Book Description

Excerpt from Cases Decided During the Sessions, 1885-6-7-8-9, by the Court of Referees on Private Bills in Parliament: Reports of Cases Decided in 1885 and 1886, by A. G. Rickards and M. J. Michael, Barristers-at-Law; Reports of Cases Decided in 1887, 1888 and 1889, by A. G. Rickards In this case an arrangement was come to between the parties that the locus standi of John Young should be Allowed, and that the locus standi of William Young should be Disallowed. About the Publisher Forgotten Books publishes hundreds of thousands of rare and classic books. Find more at www.forgottenbooks.com This book is a reproduction of an important historical work. Forgotten Books uses state-of-the-art technology to digitally reconstruct the work, preserving the original format whilst repairing imperfections present in the aged copy. In rare cases, an imperfection in the original, such as a blemish or missing page, may be replicated in our edition. We do, however, repair the vast majority of imperfections successfully; any imperfections that remain are intentionally left to preserve the state of such historical works.













General Catalogue of Printed Books


Book Description




Cases Decided During The Sessions By The Court Of Referees On Private Bills In Parliament


Book Description

This work has been selected by scholars as being culturally important, and is part of the knowledge base of civilization as we know it. This work was reproduced from the original artifact, and remains as true to the original work as possible. Therefore, you will see the original copyright references, library stamps (as most of these works have been housed in our most important libraries around the world), and other notations in the work. This work is in the public domain in the United States of America, and possibly other nations. Within the United States, you may freely copy and distribute this work, as no entity (individual or corporate) has a copyright on the body of the work. As a reproduction of a historical artifact, this work may contain missing or blurred pages, poor pictures, errant marks, etc. Scholars believe, and we concur, that this work is important enough to be preserved, reproduced, and made generally available to the public. We appreciate your support of the preservation process, and thank you for being an important part of keeping this knowledge alive and relevant.