Book Description
No detailed description available for "Critique of the Psycho-Physical Identity Theory".
Author : Eric P. Polten
Publisher : Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG
Page : 308 pages
File Size : 37,43 MB
Release : 2019-05-20
Category : Philosophy
ISBN : 311081563X
No detailed description available for "Critique of the Psycho-Physical Identity Theory".
Author : Jacob Gould Schurman
Publisher :
Page : 598 pages
File Size : 21,96 MB
Release : 1974
Category : Electronic journals
ISBN :
An international journal of general philosophy.
Author :
Publisher :
Page : 1322 pages
File Size : 38,86 MB
Release : 1983
Category : Religion
ISBN :
Author :
Publisher :
Page : 552 pages
File Size : 31,27 MB
Release : 1974
Category : Electronic journals
ISBN :
Author : R. R. Bowker LLC
Publisher :
Page : 1246 pages
File Size : 44,36 MB
Release : 1976
Category : Reference
ISBN :
Author : Library of Congress
Publisher :
Page : 720 pages
File Size : 42,81 MB
Release :
Category : Monographic series
ISBN :
Author :
Publisher :
Page : 612 pages
File Size : 44,8 MB
Release : 1973
Category : Electronic journals
ISBN :
Author :
Publisher :
Page : 140 pages
File Size : 34,97 MB
Release : 1974
Category : Occultism
ISBN :
Author :
Publisher :
Page : 1046 pages
File Size : 16,91 MB
Release : 1966
Category : Monographic series
ISBN :
Author : Gordon Globus
Publisher : Springer Science & Business Media
Page : 364 pages
File Size : 27,81 MB
Release : 2012-12-06
Category : Psychology
ISBN : 1468421964
The relationship of consciousness to brain, which Schopenhauer grandly referred to as the "world knot," remains an unsolved problem within both philosophy and science. The central focus in what follows is the relevance of science---from psychoanalysis to neurophysiology and quantum physics-to the mind-brain puzzle. Many would argue that we have advanced little since the age of the Greek philosophers, and that the extraordinary accumulation of neuroscientific knowledge in this century has helped not at all. Increas ingly, philosophers and scientists have tended to go their separate ways in considering the issues, since they tend to differ in the questions that they ask, the data and ideas which are provided for consideration, their methods for answering these questions, and criteria for judging the acceptability of an answer. But it is our conviction that philosophers and scientists can usefully interchange, at least to the extent that they provide co~straints upon each other's preferred strategies, and it may prove possible for more substantive progress to be made. Philosophers have said some rather naive things by ignoring the extraordinary advances in the neurosciences in the twentieth century. The skull is not filled with green cheese! On the other hand, the arrogance of many scientists toward philosophy and their faith in the scientific method is equally naive. Scientists clearly have much to learn from philosophy as an intellectual discipline.