Defense Base Closure and Realignment Budget Data for the Naval Surface Warfare Center


Book Description

The overall objective of the audit was to evaluate significant cost increases over the estimated costs provided to the 1991 Defense Base Closure and Realignment Commission for base closure and realignment military construction projects. This report provides the results of the audit related to the realignment of Naval Surface Warfare Centers elements in White Oak, Maryland, and Panama City, Florida, to Dahlgren, Virginia; and the realignment of the Naval Surface Warfare Center element in Annapolis, Maryland, to Carderock, Maryland. Three projects were in the FY 1993 military construction package for the Naval Surface Warfare Center; one at Dahlgren and two at Carderock.




Federal Register


Book Description




EIS Cumulative


Book Description




Defense Base Realignment and Closure Budget Data for the Realignment of Naval Surface Warfare Center Annapolis, Maryland, To Naval Surface Warfare Center Philadelphia, Pennsylvania


Book Description

The overall audit objective was to determine the accuracy of Defense base realignment and closure military construction budget data. This report provides the results of the audit of two projects, valued at $11.2 million, for the closure of Naval Surface Warfare Center Annapolis, Maryland, and realignment of the acoustics and electrical power systems facilities to Naval Surface Warfare Center Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.







Base Closure and Realignment Budget Data for the Naval Surface Warfare Center


Book Description

Introduction. The audit was directed by Public Law 102-190, "National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Years 1992 and 1993," December 5, 1991. The Public Law states that the Secretary of Defense shall ensure that the amount of the authorization requested by DoD for each military construction project associated with base realignment and closure actions does not exceed the original estimated cost provided to the Base Closure and Realignment Commission (the Commission). The Secretary of Defense is required to explain to Congress the reasons for the differences between the original project cost estimate provided to the Commission and the requested budget amount. The Inspector General, DoD, is required to review each military construction project for which a significant difference exists and to provide the results of the review to the congressional Defense committees. This report is one in a series of reports relating to FY 1994 military construction costs for realigning and closing bases.




Navy Laboratories


Book Description




Defense Base Realignment and Closure Budget Data for the Move of the Naval Air Warfare Center, Aircraft Division, Trenton, New Jersey, to the Naval Air Warfare Center, Aircraft Division, Patuxent River, Maryland, and Arnold Air Force, Tennessee


Book Description

The overall audit objective was to determine the accuracy of Defense Base Realignment and Closure Military Construction budget data. The specific objectives were to determine whether the proposed projects were valid Base Realignment and Closure requirements, whether the decision for Military Construction was supported with required documentation including an economic analysis, and whether the economic analysis considered existing facilities.