District Leadership That Works


Book Description

Bridge the great divide between distanced administrative duties and daily classroom impact. This book introduces a top-down power mechanism called defined autonomy, a concept that focuses on district-defined, nonnegotiable, common goals and a system of accountability supported by assessment tools. Defined autonomy creates an effective balance of centralized direction and individualized empowerment that allows building-level staff the stylistic freedom to respond quickly and effectively to student failure.




Leaders of Learning


Book Description

For many years, the authors have been fellow travelers on the journey to help educators improve their schools. Their first coauthored book focuses on district leadership, principal leadership, and team leadership and addresses how individual teachers can be most effective in leading students—by learning with colleagues how to implement the most promising pedagogy in their classrooms




District Leadership's Influence on Student Achievement


Book Description

The Every Student Succeeds Act requires state education agencies to develop accountability measures that identify no less than five percent of school districts for improvement (Every Student Succeeds Act, 2015). Per its federally approved ESSA Plan, New York State developed accountability measures to identify each school district as either a district in good standing or a Target District based on the achievement of its students (NYSE D,2017).In 2019,17% of New York State school districts were identified as Target Districts (NYSED, 201e). The purpose of this comparative case study was to explore how district leaders applied political reasoning to goal setting, problem definition, and solution implementation in an effort to improve student achievement. To evaluate district leadership's influence on student achievement, this study focused on three school districts designated as Target Districts by the New York State Education Department prior to the2016-2017 school year and who earned a Made Progress or Good Standing designation in 2017 -201 8, 20 1 8-20 1 9, or 2019-2020. Using Stone's (2012) framework for political reasoning, three research questions were used to explore perceptions of district leadership's political reasoning and its impact on student achievement. Data were gathered through interviews with four-to-five participants from each district, including superintendents, assistant superintendents, building principals, and teachers. Key findings showed that participants perceived that district leaders from all three districts focused goals on the needs of all students which aligned with Stone's (2012) description of equity. Additionally, key findings showed that participants perceived that district leaders clearly aligned district goals with building level actions which aligned with Stone's (2012) description of efficiency. Finally, key findings showed that participants perceived that district leadership implemented targeted professional development, intentional collaboration, and systems for data collection that all aligned with district goals. The strategic alignment between district goals and implemented practices reflected Stone's (2012) description of interests. Six conclusions were developed based on findings from this study. District leadership focused on identifying and setting clear targets for defined groups or subgroups of students when developing goals. District leadership expected that buildings would address district priorities through progress monitoring for targeted groups or through focused feedback between teachers and administrators. District leaders aligned district goals with building level actions. Building level problem-solving solutions reflected the priorities of their districts. District leadership set clear and measurable building targets and the influence of those targets on building progress monitoring. District goals mobilized building stakeholders to improve achievement for defined groups or subgroups of students. Based on these conclusions, it is recommended that district leadership explicitly identify groups or subgroups of students on which goals will focus, that district leadership consider how to efficiently align district goals and building level actions, and that district leadership consider how best to mobilize building stakeholders to achieve district goals.




School and District Leadership in an Era of Accountability


Book Description

Our fourth book in the International Research on School Leadership series focuses on school leadership in an era of high stakes accountability. Fueled by sweeping federal education accountability reforms, such as the United States’ No Child Left Behind (NCLB) and Race to the Top (R2T) and Australia’s Performance Measurement and Reporting Taskforce, school systems around the world are being forced to increase academic standards, participate in high-stakes testing, and raise evaluation standards for teachers and principals. These results-driven reforms are intended to hold educators “accountable for student learning and accountable to the public” (Anderson, 2005, p. 2, emphasis in original). While policymakers and the public debate the merits of student achievement accountability measures, P-12 educational leaders do not have the luxury to wait for clear guidance and resources to improve their schools and operating systems. Instead, successful leaders must balance the need to create learning communities, manage the organizational climate, and encourage community involvement with the consequences testing has on teacher morale and public scrutiny. The chapters in this volume clearly indicate that as school leaders attend to these potentially competing forces, this affects their problem-solving strategies, ability to facilitate change, and encourage community involvement. We were delighted with the responses from colleagues around the world who were eager to share their research dealing with how leaders are functioning effectively within a high-accountability environment. The nine chapters in this volume provide empirical evidence of the strategies school leaders use to cope with problems and negotiate external demands while improving student performance. In particular, the voices and actions of principals, superintendents, and school board members are captured in a blend of quantitative and qualitative studies. The breadth of studies is impressive, ranging from case studies of individual principals to cross-district comparisons to national data from the National Center for Education Statistics. To highlight important findings, we have organized the book into five sections. The first section (Chapters 2, 3, and 4) highlights the problem-solving strategies used by principals and superintendents when pressured to turn around low-performing schools. In the second section (Chapters 5 and 6), attention is devoted to ways in which school leaders act as “buffers” by reducing the impact of external demands within their local school contexts. Next, Chapters 7 and 8 explore creative ways in which financial analyses can be used to assess the cost effectiveness of programs and services. Chapters 9 and 10 examine how principals enact their instructional leadership roles in managing curriculum reforms and evaluating teachers. Finally, in the last section (Chapter 11), Kenneth Leithwood synthesizes the major themes and ideas emerging across these chapters, paying particular attention to practical issues influencing school leaders in this era of school reform and accountability as well as promising areas for future research.




School Leadership That Works


Book Description

This guide to the 21 leadership responsibilities that influence student achievement will help school leaders focus on changes that really make a difference.




Balanced Leadership


Book Description

Alarmed by mounting evidence of a national shortage of qualified and willing principals, the authors surveyed or interviewed over 200 school principals from across the country to find out why so many are leaving the profession and how those who stay manage their work. They discovered that regardless of a principal's race, gender, school level, geographic region, or tenure, there was a remarkable consistency in the challenges identified and suggestions given for revamping the role of the American principal. Featuring stories shared by practicing principals, this timely volume: offers fresh insights on ways to both attract and retain good principals; shows how successful principals reconcile their expectations and hopes with the realities and disappointments encountered in their work; examines issues common to all principals, such as time management, staff evaluations, keeping the focus on instruction, community expectations, and pursuing a balanced life; presents strategies that principals have used to make their role more effective and more attractive; and provides practical ideas for coping with the present and envisioning the future, including alternative principal models.




The Impact of Leadership Style on Student Achievement


Book Description

The purpose of this qualitative case study research was to investigate the existing degree of relationship between leadership styles and student achievement for principals in small, rural, southeast districts in Arizona. Student achievement was measured by fifth grade AIMS Mathematic scores over a two year period. Leadership style of the principals was measured by the MLQ-5X survey completed by eight participants (principals) and 102 raters (teachers). Interviews were conducted with a subset of the principals to gather more information in relation to their leadership style. Each leadership attribute was examined in relation to the student achievement on AIMS mathematics test for quantitative data analysis. The qualitative data analysis was performed with a word and phrase frequency counter to identify specific themes across the leadership style. Based on the findings of this study it is recommended that principals use the MLQ survey each school year to modify or enhance their leadership style by focusing professional development on strengthening leadership styles to establish commonality within district leadership to enhance student achievement. To expand on the results of this study, future research is recommended to include student SES, compare school districts to identify trends in school test scores to determine if district leadership impacts building leadership that has an indirect impact on student achievement, and include stakeholders in the MLQ survey to gain feedback.




Sharing Leadership Responsibilities Results in Achievement Gains


Book Description

Collective, not individual, leadership in schools has a greater impact on student achievement; when principals and teachers share leadership responsibilities, student achievement is higher; and schools having high student achievement also display a vision for student achievement and teacher growth. Those are just a few of the insights into school leadership presented in a new report, "Learning from Leadership: Investigating the Links to Improved Student Learning." Presented by the Wallace Foundation, the 338-page report attempted to connect leadership and learning. The study looked at "collective leadership" in schools which was defined as "the sum of influence exercised on school decisions by those educators, parents and students associated with the school." Positive effects were found comparing collective to individual leadership. Among them were: (1) Collective leadership has a stronger influence on student learning than any individual source of leadership; (2) Almost all people associated with high-performing schools have greater influence on school decisions than is the case with people in low performing schools; (3) Compared to all teacher respondents, teachers from high-performing schools attribute greater influence to teacher teams, parents, and students; (4) In all schools, principals and district leaders exercise the most influence on decisions; and (5) Teacher motivation had the strongest relationship with student achievement. When looking at parent involvement as part of collective leadership, the researchers found that greater district level support for greater parental involvement in schools led to more diversity of membership on site councils. However, district leadership did not impact how open principals were to community and parental involvement outside of site councils.




How School Leaders Contribute to Student Success


Book Description

While considerable evidence indicates that school leaders are able to make important contributions to the success of their students, much less is known about how such contributions are made. This book provides a comprehensive account of research aimed at filling this gap in our knowledge, along with guidelines about how school leaders might use this knowledge for their own school improvement work. Leadership practices known to be effective for improving student success are outlined in the first section of the book while the remaining sections identify four “paths” along which the influence of those practices “flow” to exercise an influence on student success. Each of the Rational, Emotional, Organizational and Family paths are populated by conditions or variables known to have relatively direct effects on student success and also open to influence by effective leadership practices. While the Four Path framework narrows the attention of school leaders to a still-considerable number conditions known to contribute to student success, it leaves school leaders the autonomy to select, for improvement efforts, the sub-set of conditions that make the most sense in their own local circumstances. The approach to leadership described in this book provides evidence-based guidance on what to lead and flexibility on how to lead for purposes of improving student learning.




Improving Schools


Book Description

Improving Schools: Studies in Leadership and Culture is the seventh in a series on research and theory dedicated to advancing our understanding of schools through empirical study and theoretical analysis. This book is organized around two broad concepts—leadership and culture, which have important implications for improving schools. The book begins with an analysis of the saliency of trust in the culture of schools. In the first chapter, Patrick Forsythís review of the consequences of school trust sets the tone for seeking and developing school cultures that enhance high academic performance of students. The investigation of school trust is traced over several decades at four research universities as scholars at each institution conceptualized, refined, and examined the consequences of school trust. It seems fair to conclude that a school culture that is anchored in values and norms of faculty trusting students and parents facilitates high academic achievement and positive outcomes.