Evaluating the Regulatory Review and Approval Process for Major Projects


Book Description

The proposed Mackenzie Gas Project (MGP) involves extraction and transportation of natural gas and natural gas liquids from the Mackenzie Delta to northwestern Alberta, a distance of approximately 1,200 kilometres. This study evaluates the regulatory review and approval process for the MGP based on a set of 13 best practice principles. The evaluative framework in this report is drawn from best practice literature for environmental assessment developed by a number of Canadian and international authors, and is tailored to examine the regulatory review and approval process for northern projects. Results indicate that two of the best practice principles were fully met, three were largely met, seven were partially met and one was not met. Strengths of the process include methods used to clarify roles and responsibilities and the framework used to assess cumulative effects. Deficiencies include the lack of transparent decisions.




Plan for Public Involvement in the Environmental Assessment of the Proposed Mackenzie Valley Gas Pipeline in the NWT.


Book Description

"This document is intended to provide general information to the public about opportunities to participate in the environmental impact assessment and regulatory review of a northern gas pipeline project through the Northwest Territories. More specific details on the review process are available through the Cooperation Plan for the Environmental Impact Assessment and Regulatory Review of a Northern Gas Pipeline Project through the Northwest Territories [ASTIS record 49743] and such agreements as the Memorandum of Understanding Between the Minister of the Environmental and the Inuvialuit, the Draft Agreement for an Environmental Impact Review of a Northern Gas Project and the Draft Agreement for Coordination of the Regulatory Review of a Northern Gas Development and Pipeline Project"--P. 3.










Foundation for a Sustainable Northern Future


Book Description

Subject to the full implementation of the Panel's recommendations, the Panel has concluded that the adverse impacts of the Mackenzie Gas Project and the Northwest Alberta Facilities would not likely be significant and that the Project and those Facilities would likely make a positive contribution towards sustainability. [...] The Panel would like to express its gratitude to the community field workers who travelled to various northern communities to The Panel would like to thank the Canadian Environmental explain the review process to everyone, and to the Aboriginal Assessment Agency, the Mackenzie Valley Environmental Impact interpreters who had the difficult task of simultaneously Review Board and the Inuvialuit Game [...] The prospect of these additional net gains without significant adverse impacts during the life developments was the basis of both the aspirations and the of the Project and effective use of the Project and associated apprehensions the Panel heard with respect to the Project. [...] The Proponents have committed to provide certain mitigations and enhancements with respect to the Project, the most In the Panel's view, the MGP offers a unique opportunity to build important of which include the establishment of the Aboriginal a sustainable future in the Mackenzie Valley and Beaufort Delta Pipeline Group, the negotiation of Access and Benefits regions. [...] The Proponents' committed to providing important mitigations and enhancements, mitigations and enhancements, the measures governments the most notable being the creation of the Mackenzie Gas Project would put in place, and the Panel's recommendations would, Impacts Fund.







Granular Resource Work in Support of Environmental Assessment and Regulatory Review of the Mackenzie Gas Project


Book Description

This report deals with granular-resource-related work undertaken by the author for the Land and Water Management Directorate of Indian and Northern Affairs Canada, in support of the environmental assessment and regulatory review of the Mackenzie Gas Project. The Mackenzie Gas Project is a joint proposal to develop natural gas in the Mackenzie Delta area and deliver it to markets in Canada and the United States. The project proponents are Shell Canada Limited, Conoco Phillips Canada (North) Limited, ExxonMobil, Imperial Oil Resources Ventures Limited and the Aboriginal Pipeline Group. More specifically, the work involved an analysis of key issues concerning granular resource management that have been raised in the environmental review and regulatory approval processes of the Mackenzie Gas Project. The work is based entirely on information in the public registries for the Mackenzie Gas Project. The public registries for the Mackenzie Gas Project are the Joint Review Panel Public Registry and the National Energy Board Public Registry. The key issues were determined through examination of the completed registry spreadsheets and digital archive which make up the document inventory from previous work, as well as the Mackenzie Gas Project public registries. The key issues were then assessed which involved researching, analyzing, summarizing, and providing feedback on the key issues. The key issues in order of importance are the amount of granular material required for project/issues of supply and demand, granular material required for the three anchor fields, fill/imported fill for the pipeline trench, issues involving communities, and reclamation of borrow pits. Further analysis of these key issues gives a better indication of the Mackenzie Gas Projects impact on granular resources as well as identifies any need for further consideration of granular information during the regulatory approvals phase of the Mackenzie Gas Project. The analysis of these key issues indicates that some of the issues require further consideration during the regulatory approvals phase of the Mackenzie Gas Project. Regarding the issue of supply and demand, it is recommended that the proponent re-evaluate their supply estimates especially taking into consideration ground ice in borrow sources. It is also recommended that the proponent estimate or calculate some granular requirements for reasonably foreseeable developments and cumulative induced developments. Regarding the issue of granular material required for the three anchor fields, it is recommended that this issue undergo further analysis because of uncertainties of things like the proponents supply estimates and potential ground ice. Regarding the issue of fill/imported fill for the pipeline trench, it is being recommended that more work be done during the regulatory approvals phase due to a lack of substantial information regarding the issue of imported fill. Regarding the issue of issues involving communities it is recommended that the proponent continue working with the communities throughout all stages of the project on issues involving granular resources. Finally, regarding the issue of reclamation of borrow pits, there needs to be more information and more quality information on reclamation of borrow pits. Also, it is recommended that the proponent place more emphasis on reviewing material involving past rehabilitation of borrow sites -- ASTIS (online) bibliography.