Final Environmental Impact Statement. Disposal and Reuse of George Air Force Base, California. Volume 2. Public Comments and Responses, Appendices


Book Description

The Air Force has complied with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) mandate of public participation in the environmental impact analysis process primarily in two ways: (1) A public hearing was held in Victorville, California, on October 17, 1991, at which the Air Force presented the findings of the Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) for disposal and reuse of George Air Force Base (AFB) and invited public comments; and (2) The subject DEIS was made available for public review and comment in October-November 1991. The comments and responses are grouped by area of concern, as follows: (1.0) Air Force policy; (2.0) Purpose and need for action; (3.0) Alternatives including the proposed action; (4.0) Land transfer/disposal; (5.0) Local community; (6.0) Land Use/Aesthetics;, (7.0) Transportation; (8.0) Airspace; (9.0) Utilities; (10.0) Hazardous materials/waste management; (11.0) Soils and geology; (12.0) Water resources; (13.0) Air Quality; (14.0) Noise; (15.0) Biological resources; (16.0) Cultural resources; and (17.0) Socioeconomic impact analysis study.










Environmental Impact Statement. Disposal and Reuse of George Air Force Base, California


Book Description

On January 5, 1989, the Secretary of Defense announced the closure of George AFB, California, pursuant to the Base Closure and Realignment Act. Previous environmental documentation culminated in the filing of a Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Closure of George AFB on May 4,1990. A record of Decision (ROD) for the action was signed June 20, 1990. The base is scheduled for closure December 15, 1992. This EIS has been prepared in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act to analyze the potential environmental consequences of the disposal and reasonable alternatives for reuse of the base. The document includes analyses of the potential impacts each alternative may have on the local community, including land use and aesthetics, transportation, utilities, hazardous materials/wastes, geology and soils, water resources, air quality, noise, biological resources and cultural resources. Potential environmental impacts are increased aircraft-related noise levels, increased traffic, reduced wildlife habitat, alteration of topography, alteration of water flow and drainage patterns, and temporary effects of elevated concentrations of particulate matter during construction. Traffic mitigations include contributions to area roadway Improvements. If avoidance of biological resources is not adequate or possible, mitigation in the form of replacement, restoration, or enhancement is possible.