Author : Assembly of Behavioral and Social Sciences (U.S.). Panel on Legislative Impact on Courts
Publisher : National Academies
Page : 240 pages
File Size : 32,88 MB
Release : 1980
Category : Law
ISBN :
Author : A. Fletcher Magnum
Publisher : DIANE Publishing
Page : 181 pages
File Size : 38,92 MB
Release : 1998-05
Category :
ISBN : 0788149911
Includes background information on how legislation affects court workload & on historical development of judicial impact assessment as a tool by which to measure this effect. Contains the papers prepared for each of the three sessions -- policy (interbranch communications: the next generation); theory (caseloading in the balance, judicial impact statements: unpacking the discourse, judicial preferences, public choice & the rules of procedure, overcoming the competence/credibility paradox in judicial impact assessment); & applied (the impact of national legislation on State courts, observation on impact models on Federal courts).
Author :
Publisher :
Page : 188 pages
File Size : 28,4 MB
Release : 1995
Category : Court congestion and delay
ISBN :
Author : Assembly of Behavioral and Social Sciences (U.S.). Panel on Legislative Impact on Courts
Publisher : National Academies
Page : 232 pages
File Size : 47,36 MB
Release : 1980
Category : Law
ISBN :
Author : Cornell W. Clayton
Publisher : University of Chicago Press
Page : 359 pages
File Size : 13,53 MB
Release : 1999
Category : Law
ISBN : 0226109550
What influences decisions of the U.S. Supreme Court? For decades social scientists focused on the ideology of individual justices. Supreme Court Decision Making moves beyond this focus by exploring how justices are influenced by the distinctive features of courts as institutions and their place in the political system. Drawing on interpretive-historical institutionalism as well as rational choice theory, a group of leading scholars consider such factors as the influence of jurisprudence, the unique characteristics of supreme courts, the dynamics of coalition building, and the effects of social movements. The volume's distinguished contributors and broad range make it essential reading for those interested either in the Supreme Court or the nature of institutional politics. Original essays contributed by Lawrence Baum, Paul Brace, Elizabeth Bussiere, Cornell Clayton, Sue Davis, Charles Epp, Lee Epstein, Howard Gillman, Melinda Gann Hall, Ronald Kahn, Jack Knight, Forrest Maltzman, David O'Brien, Jeffrey Segal, Charles Sheldon, James Spriggs II, and Paul Wahlbeck.
Author : John V. Sullivan
Publisher :
Page : 72 pages
File Size : 25,90 MB
Release : 2007
Category : Government publications
ISBN :
Author : Oliver Wendell Holmes
Publisher :
Page : 448 pages
File Size : 29,81 MB
Release : 1909
Category : Common law
ISBN :
Author : United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary. Subcommittee on Jurisprudence and Governmental Relations
Publisher :
Page : 76 pages
File Size : 37,60 MB
Release : 1981
Category : Judicial impact statements
ISBN :
Author : National Criminal Justice Reference Service (U.S.)
Publisher :
Page : 398 pages
File Size : 20,41 MB
Release : 1981
Category : Criminal justice, Administration of
ISBN :
Author : American Bar Association. House of Delegates
Publisher : American Bar Association
Page : 216 pages
File Size : 26,30 MB
Release : 2007
Category : Law
ISBN : 9781590318737
The Model Rules of Professional Conduct provides an up-to-date resource for information on legal ethics. Federal, state and local courts in all jurisdictions look to the Rules for guidance in solving lawyer malpractice cases, disciplinary actions, disqualification issues, sanctions questions and much more. In this volume, black-letter Rules of Professional Conduct are followed by numbered Comments that explain each Rule's purpose and provide suggestions for its practical application. The Rules will help you identify proper conduct in a variety of given situations, review those instances where discretionary action is possible, and define the nature of the relationship between you and your clients, colleagues and the courts.
