Sovereignty Conflicts and International Law and Politics


Book Description

Many ongoing conflicts throughout the world can be characterised as sovereignty conflicts in which two States claim exclusive sovereign rights for different reasons over the same piece of land. Drawing on the work of John Rawls this book considers how distributive justice theories can be in tune with the concept of sovereignty and explores the possibility of a solution for sovereignty conflicts based on Rawlsian methodology. Jorge E. Núñez explores a solution of egalitarian shared sovereignty, evaluating what sorts of institutions and arrangements could, and would, best realise shared sovereignty, and how it might be applied to territory, population, government and law.




Money, Markets, and Sovereignty


Book Description

Winner of the 2010 Hayek Book Prize given by the Manhattan Institute "Money, Markets and Sovereignty is a surprisingly easy read, given the complicated issues covered. In it, Mr. Steil and Mr. Hinds consistently challenge today's statist nostrums."—Doug Bandow, The Washington Times In this keenly argued book, Benn Steil and Manuel Hinds offer the most powerful defense of economic liberalism since F. A. Hayek published The Road to Serfdom more than sixty years ago. The authors present a fascinating intellectual history of monetary nationalism from the ancient world to the present and explore why, in its modern incarnation, it represents the single greatest threat to globalization. Steil and Hinds describe the current state of international economic relations as both unusual and precarious. Eras of economic protectionism have historically coincided with monetary nationalism, while eras of liberal trade have been accompanied by a universal monetary standard. But today, the authors show, an unprecedentedly liberal global trade regime operates side by side with the most extreme doctrine of monetary nationalism ever contrived—a situation bound to trigger periodic crises. Steil and Hinds call for a revival of the political and economic thinking that underlay earlier great periods of globalization, thinking that is increasingly under threat by more recent ideas about what sovereignty means.




From Conflicts of Sovereignty to Relationships


Book Description

This thesis seeks to demonstrate that contrary to conventional histories of the discipline, 19th century writings on Private International Law included an internationalist strand that focused on the individual, rather than the state, but adopted an account of the individual as social and relationally constituted. The thesis dispels two common assumptions about the 19th century intellectual history of the field: first, that all individual - and private law - centered perspectives were overly liberal and individualistic and second, that the association between Public and Private International Law enabled the latter to focus on global public goods and global justice generally. By contrast, the thesis shows, on the one hand, that many 19th century theories focused on the relationship between Public and Private International Law injected much of the formalism and alleged neutrality of today's Private International Law and on the other, that several individual-centered perspectives adopted a relational, rather than individualistic image of the individual. By recovering academic debates in Private International Law between the mid 19th to the mid 20th century, the thesis traces how this "relational internationalist" perspective was misunderstood and eventually disappeared from the memory of the field. Through a detailed analysis of the writings of the three main protagonists of the "relational internationalist" perspective, namely Joseph Story, Carl von Savigny, and Josephus Jitta, the thesis recovers the analytical foundation of this lost theoretical perspective with respect to rights, legitimate authority and the cosmopolitan dimensions of Private International Law. This thesis both tells a different history of 19th century Private International Law than the conventional one, and suggests that its "relational internationalist" component could provide a platform on which to now build a humanist perspective in PrIL which focuses both on the recognition, as well as the social responsibility of individuals in their transnational relationships.




Property and Sovereignty


Book Description

This book explores the relationships between property and the concept of sovereignty from a number of different perspectives. It distinguishes between the dual meaning of 'sovereignty' in property discourse - political sovereignty and owner sovereignty. The contributors discuss the nature of sovereignty in both senses, applying it to a wide range of topics such as the evolution of property rights in fragile and conflict-affected nation states, and notions of sovereign property in new worlds. A section on the Arts illuminates the relationships between property, sovereignty, and culture, and a further section investigates regulatory property and governmental control over resources. The book concludes with an exploration of sovereign shaping of private property entitlements to achieve instrumental ends. This interesting collection will be valuable to those in the fields of legal philosophy, property theory, international and comparative law, and political sociology. This book explores the relationships between property and the concept of sovereignty from a number of different perspectives. It distinguishes between the dual meaning of ‘sovereignty’ in property discourse - political sovereignty and owner sovereignty. The contributors discuss the nature of sovereignty in both senses, applying it to a wide range of topics such as the evolution of property rights in fragile and conflict-affected nation states and notions of sovereign property in new worlds. A section on The Arts illuminates the relationships between property, sovereignty and culture and a further section investigates regulatory property and governmental control over resources. The book concludes with an exploration of sovereign shaping of private property entitlements to achieve instrumental ends. This interesting collection will be valuable to those in the fields of legal philosophy, property theory, international and comparative law, and political sociology.




A Republican Europe of States


Book Description

Examines the democratic legitimacy of international organisations from a republican perspective, diagnoses the EU as suffering from a democratic disconnect and offers 'demoicracy' as the cure.




Sovereignty on Trial, the Delaware-Cherokee Relationship Divided in Conflict.


Book Description

This study explores the conflict between two Indian nations, the Delaware Tribe of Indians (headquartered in Bartlesville, Oklahoma) and the Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma (headquartered in Tahlequah, Oklahoma). The removal of the Delawares to the Cherokee Nation in 1867 created overlapping tribal territorial jurisdictions. Neither side would compromise what they understood to be their sovereignty, land, and resources. The Delawares argue that they should fully exercise their political relationship with the United States just as any other tribal nation while the Cherokee Nation resist the Delawares' sovereignty. Both the Delaware Tribe of Indians and the Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma are historically important. The Delawares were the first tribal nation to sign a treaty with the United States, thus setting the stage for the relationship between all Indian tribes and the federal government. The Cherokee Nation is noted in history for its legal challenges to the U.S. that defined American Indian tribes as domestic dependant nations, which is a legal basis for tribal sovereignty today. Although numerous scholars have explored the Delawares and Cherokees, few have explored the divisive relationship between these two nations. Their relationship calls into question the legal and highly political definition of federal acknowledgement and the administrative processes thereof. With recognition comes federal resources and money. Thus, in the struggle of these two nations an important aspect of tribal sovereignty is on trial. The controversy is not just a matter of two tribal nations defending their own territory and resources. It is a matter of nationalism, history, and identity. Delaware-Cherokee hostility intensified in, 1979, when the Indian Self-Determination and Assistance Act became law. Up to this point, the federal government recognized the Delaware Tribe of Indians, specifically because the Delawares were recognized as eligible to reorganize through the 1934 Oklahoma Indian Welfare Act (OIWA). In 1977, the Cherokee Nation reorganized and began to insist that the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) recognize the 1867 Articles of Agreement between the Delawares and the Cherokees. As a result of the Cherokee Nation's pressure, the BIA terminated its government to government relationship with the Delaware Tribe of Indians in 1979. The Delawares appealed their case to the BIA which administratively restored the Delawares' federal acknowledgement in 1996. During the eight years that the Delawares were restored to federal acknowledgement, the Cherokee Nation objected and took the BIA up the legal ladder to the Supreme Court. In the mean time, the Delaware Tribe of Indians developed a number of successful programs available only to federally recognized tribes through the Indian Self-Determination and Assistance Act, but court rulings destroyed these programs. Thus, the Delawares became the only tribe to lose its federal recognition twice in the last forty years. While this study examines the uniquely divisive relationship between the Delawares and Cherokees, it is a study about termination and federal recognition and the rights of the tribal members that is relevant to all tribes. Thus, this dissertation illuminates important issues that are at the heart of Indian history today---sovereignty, self-determination and identity.




Hierarchy in International Relations


Book Description

International relations are generally understood as a realm of anarchy in which countries lack any superior authority and interact within a Hobbesian state of nature. In Hierarchy in International Relations, David A. Lake challenges this traditional view, demonstrating that states exercise authority over one another in international hierarchies that vary historically but are still pervasive today. Revisiting the concepts of authority and sovereignty, Lake offers a novel view of international relations in which states form social contracts that bind both dominant and subordinate members. The resulting hierarchies have significant effects on the foreign policies of states as well as patterns of international conflict and cooperation. Focusing largely on U.S.-led hierarchies in the contemporary world, Lake provides a compelling account of the origins, functions, and limits of political order in the modern international system. The book is a model of clarity in theory, research design, and the use of evidence. Motivated by concerns about the declining international legitimacy of the United States following the Iraq War, Hierarchy in International Relations offers a powerful analytic perspective that has important implications for understanding America's position in the world in the years ahead.




The Sovereignty Wars


Book Description

Protecting sovereignty while advancing American interests in the global age Americans have long been protective of the country’s sovereignty—beginning when George Washington retired as president with the admonition for his successors to avoid “permanent” alliances with foreign powers. Ever since, the nation has faced persistent, often heated debates about how to maintain that sovereignty, and whether it is endangered when the United States enters international organizations, treaties, and alliances about which Washington warned. As the recent election made clear, sovereignty is also one of the most frequently invoked, polemical, and misunderstood concepts in politics—particularly American politics. The concept wields symbolic power, implying something sacred and inalienable: the right of the people to control their fate without subordination to outside authorities. Given its emotional pull, however, the concept is easily highjacked by political opportunists. By playing the sovereignty card, they can curtail more reasoned debates over the merits of proposed international commitments by portraying supporters of global treaties or organizations as enemies of motherhood and apple pie. Such polemics distract Americans from what is really at stake in the sovereignty debate: namely, the ability of the United States to shape its destiny in a global age. The United States cannot successfully manage globalization, much less insulate itself from cross-border threats, on its own. As global integration deepens and cross-border challenges grow, the nation’s fate is increasingly tied to that of other countries, whose cooperation will be needed to exploit the shared opportunities and mitigate the common risks of interdependence. The Sovereignty Wars is intended to help today's policymakers think more clearly about what is actually at stake in the sovereignty debate and to provide some criteria for determining when it is appropriate to make bargains over sovereignty—and how to make them.




The New Sovereignty


Book Description

In an increasingly complex and interdependent world, states resort to a bewildering array of regulatory agreements to deal with problems as disparate as climate change, nuclear proliferation, international trade, satellite communications, species destruction, and intellectual property. In such a system, there must be some means of ensuring reasonably reliable performance of treaty obligations. The standard approach to this problem, by academics and politicians alike, is a search for treaties with "teeth"--military or economic sanctions to deter and punish violation. The New Sovereignty argues that this approach is misconceived. Cases of coercive enforcement are rare, and sanctions are too costly and difficult to mobilize to be a reliable enforcement tool. As an alternative to this "enforcement" model, the authors propose a "managerial" model of treaty compliance. It relies on the elaboration and application of treaty norms in a continuing dialogue between the parties--international officials and nongovernmental organizations--that generates pressure to resolve problems of noncompliance. In the process, the norms and practices of the regime themselves evolve and develop. The authors take a broad look at treaties in many different areas: arms control, human rights, labor, the environment, monetary policy, and trade. The extraordinary wealth of examples includes the Iran airbus shootdown, Libya's suit against Great Britain and the United States in the Lockerbie case, the war in Bosnia, and Iraq after the Gulf War. The authors conclude that sovereignty--the status of a recognized actor in the international system--requires membership in good standing in the organizations and regimes through which the world manages its common affairs. This requirement turns out to be the major pressure for compliance with treaty obligations. This book will be an invaluable resource and casebook for scholars, policymakers, international public servants, lawyers, and corporate executives.




Understanding Conflicts of Sovereignty in the EU


Book Description

This book investigates the multifaceted conflicts of sovereignty in the recent crises in the European Union. Although the notion of sovereignty has been central in the contentious debates triggered by the recent crises in the European Union, it remains strikingly under-researched in political science. This book bridges this gap by providing both theoretical reflections and empirical analyses of today’s conflicts of sovereignty in the EU. More particularly, it investigates conflicts between four types of sovereignty. First, national sovereignty referring to the autonomy of the Westphalian Nation-State to rule on a territory delimited by borders; second, the supranational sovereignty acquired by the EU in a fragmentary fashion in a number of scattered internal and external policy fields; third, parliamentary sovereignty understood as the autonomy of parliaments (at the regional, national and European levels) to take part in the decision making process and control the executive in the name of the principles of election and representation; fourth, popular sovereignty whereby the body politic confers legitimacy to decision makers in a democratic system. Through an analysis of the various crises (rule of law, Brexit, migration, Eurozone crisis), the chapters look at how sovereignty is framed and contested by different types of actors, and how the strengthening or the weakening of certain types of sovereignty contribute to shape preferences regarding policies and governance structures in the multi-level EU. The chapters in this book were originally published as a special issue of the Journal of European Integration.