Installation Restoration Program. Phase 2. Confirmation/Quantification. Stage 1 Report for Beale AFB, Marysville, California


Book Description

The overall objective of the Phase II investigation is to define the magnitude, extent, direction, and rate of movement of identified contaminants in the ground water. A series of staged field investigations may be required to meet this objective. The contractor shall recommend any additional investigations required beyond this stage including an estimate of costs. The purpose of this task is to undertake a field investigation at Beale AFB Ca: (1) to determine the presence or absence of environmental contamination within the specified areas of investigation; (2) if contamination exists, to determine the potential for migration of these contaminants in the various environmental media; and (3) to identify potential environmental consequences and health risks of migrating pollutants based on applicable local, state and/or federal standards.




Installation Restoration Program. Phase 2. Confirmation/Quantification. Stage 1 Report for Beale AFB, Marysville, California


Book Description

The objective of this survey was to confirm and quantify the presence and extent of contamination at 18 sites: West Drainage, Photo Waste Injection, FPTA, Battery Shop, SR-71 Shelter, Landfill 2, Biological Production, J-57 Test Cell, Entomology Building 2560, J-58 Test Cell, AGE Maintenance, Entomology Building 440, Landfill 1, Transformer Drainage, Landfill 3, EOD Disposal, Bulk Fuels Storage and Best Slough. Twenty groundwater monitoring wells were drilled and installed (using air rotary with casing hammer drilling and steel well construction). These wells, plus four existing monitoring wells and base production wells are sampled twice and analyzed for volatile organics and other parameters. In addition, 49 auger borings were drilled, 69 hand samples and bottom sediments were collected from 47 locations and surface waters were collected from eight locations. A geophysical survey was performed on one site.
















Installation Restoration Program


Book Description




Installation Restoration Program. Phase 2. Confirmation/Quantification. Stage 1. Air Force Plant 4, Fort Worth, Texas. Volume 5. Appendix A-2


Book Description

This report contains information concerning environmental protection and water quality. Volume 5 and Volume 6 contain all quality/assurance quality control reports for water analyses (organized by work order number). Also included are summary tables (Tables A.2-1 through A.2-9) of the QC reports.




Installation Restoration Program. Phase 2. Confirmation/Quantification Stage 1. US Air Force Plant Number 42, Palmdale, California


Book Description

An Installation Restoration Program (IRP) Phase II, Stage 1 investigation was conducted at USAF Plant 42 in Palmdale, California, to confirm the presence or absence of contamination at 23 sites. Contamination was suspected at the sites as a result of past spills, leaks, or waste disposal practices. A field investigation program was conducted, consisting of soil boring and sampling, groundwater sampling, and chemical analysis of environmental samples (water and soils) for suspected contaminants. No significant contaminants were found at 17 of the sites. Fuel contamination (petroleum hydrocarbons or oil & grease) was detected at 5 sites, 3 of which also had volatile organics present. Remedial action was recommended for 2 sites because of the location and amount of contaminants detected.




Installation Restoration Program. Phase 2. Confirmation/Quantification Stage 1. US Air Force Plant Number 42, Palmdale, California


Book Description

An INstallation Restoration Program (IRP) Phase II, Stage 1 investigation was conducted at USAF Plant 42 in Palmdale, California, to confirm the presence or absence of contamination at 23 sites. Contamination was suspected at the sites as a result of past spills, leaks, or waste disposal practices. A field investigation program was conducted, consisting of soil boring and sampling, groundwater sampling, and chemical analysis of environmental samples (water and soils) for suspected contaminants. No significant contaminants were found at 17 of the sites. Fuel contamination (petroleum hydrocarbons or oil & grease) was detected at 5 sites, 3 of which also had volatile organics present. Remedial action was recommended for 2 sites because of the location and amount of contaminants detected.