Book Description
Tracing the development of originalism, Eric J. Segall shows how judges often use the theory to reach politically desirable results.
Author : Eric J. Segall
Publisher : Cambridge University Press
Page : 259 pages
File Size : 44,69 MB
Release : 2018-10-18
Category : Law
ISBN : 1107188555
Tracing the development of originalism, Eric J. Segall shows how judges often use the theory to reach politically desirable results.
Author : Marta Traba
Publisher : Inter-American Development Bank
Page : 197 pages
File Size : 27,1 MB
Release : 1994-01-01
Category : Art
ISBN : 0940602733
Marta Traba, one of Latin America's most controversial art critics, examines the works of over 1,000 artists from the first 80 years of the 20th century. This book is an indispensable reference for anyone interested in studying the evolution of Latin American art.
Author : Lee J. Strang
Publisher : Cambridge University Press
Page : 329 pages
File Size : 46,62 MB
Release : 2019-08-08
Category : History
ISBN : 1108475639
Provides the first natural law justification for an originalist interpretation of the American Constitution.
Author : Eric J. Segall
Publisher : Bloomsbury Publishing USA
Page : 281 pages
File Size : 32,68 MB
Release : 2012-02-22
Category : Political Science
ISBN :
This book explores some of the most glaring misunderstandings about the U.S. Supreme Court—and makes a strong case for why our Supreme Court Justices should not be entrusted with decisions that affect every American citizen. Supreme Myths: Why the Supreme Court is Not a Court and its Justices are Not Judges presents a detailed discussion of the Court's most important and controversial constitutional cases that demonstrates why it doesn't justify being labeled "a court of law." Eric Segall, professor of law at Georgia State University College of Law for two decades, explains why this third branch of the national government is an institution that makes important judgments about fundamental questions based on the Justices' ideological preferences, not the law. A complete understanding of the true nature of the Court's decision-making process is necessary, he argues, before an intelligent debate over who should serve on the Court—and how they should resolve cases—can be held. Addressing front-page areas of constitutional law such as health care, abortion, affirmative action, gun control, and freedom of religion, this book offers a frank description of how the Supreme Court truly operates, a critique of life tenure of its Justices, and a set of proposals aimed at making the Court function more transparently to further the goals of our representative democracy.
Author : Carol Berkin
Publisher : Simon and Schuster
Page : 272 pages
File Size : 29,53 MB
Release : 2015-05-05
Category : History
ISBN : 1476743819
“Narrative, celebratory history at its purest” (Publishers Weekly)—the real story of how the Bill of Rights came to be: a vivid account of political strategy, big egos, and the partisan interests that set the terms of the ongoing contest between the federal government and the states. Those who argue that the Bill of Rights reflects the founding fathers’ “original intent” are wrong. The Bill of Rights was actually a brilliant political act executed by James Madison to preserve the Constitution, the federal government, and the latter’s authority over the states. In the skilled hands of award-winning historian Carol Berkin, the story of the founders’ fight over the Bill of Rights comes alive in a drama full of partisanship, clashing egos, and cunning manipulation. In 1789, the nation faced a great divide around a question still unanswered today: should broad power and authority reside in the federal government or should it reside in state governments? The Bill of Rights, from protecting religious freedom to the people’s right to bear arms, was a political ploy first and a matter of principle second. The truth of how and why Madison came to devise this plan, the debates it caused in the Congress, and its ultimate success is more engrossing than any of the myths that shroud our national beginnings. The debate over the Bill of Rights still continues through many Supreme Court decisions. By pulling back the curtain on the short-sighted and self-interested intentions of the founding fathers, Berkin reveals the anxiety many felt that the new federal government might not survive—and shows that the true “original intent” of the Bill of Rights was simply to oppose the Antifederalists who hoped to diminish the government’s powers. This book is “a highly readable American history lesson that provides a deeper understanding of the Bill of Rights, the fears that generated it, and the miracle of the amendments” (Kirkus Reviews).
Author : Johnathan O'Neill
Publisher : JHU Press
Page : 308 pages
File Size : 43,46 MB
Release : 2005-07-12
Category : History
ISBN : 9780801881114
This book explains how the debate over originalism emerged from the interaction of constitutional theory, U.S. Supreme Court decisions, and American political development. Refuting the contention that originalism is a recent concoction of political conservatives like Robert Bork, Johnathan O'Neill asserts that recent appeals to the origin of the Constitution in Supreme Court decisions and commentary, especially by Justices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas, continue an established pattern in American history. Originalism in American Law and Politics is distinguished by its historical approach to the topic. Drawing on constitutional commentary and treatises, Supreme Court and lower federal court opinions, congressional hearings, and scholarly monographs, O'Neill's work will be valuable to historians, academic lawyers, and political scientists.
Author : Christopher Wolfe
Publisher : Rowman & Littlefield Publishers
Page : 463 pages
File Size : 49,33 MB
Release : 1994-03-29
Category : Philosophy
ISBN : 1461645468
This major history of judicial review, revised to include the Rehnquist court, shows how modern courts have used their power to create new "rights with fateful political consequences." Originally published by Basic Books.
Author : Robert H. Bork
Publisher : Simon and Schuster
Page : 452 pages
File Size : 39,11 MB
Release : 2009-11-24
Category : Political Science
ISBN : 1439188866
Judge Bork shares a personal account of the Senate Judiciary Committee's hearing on his nomination as well as his view on politics versus the law. In The Tempting of America, one of our most distinguished legal minds offers a brilliant argument for the wisdom and necessity of interpreting the Constitution according to the “original understanding” of the Framers and the people for whom it was written. Widely hailed as the most important critique of the nation’s intellectual climate since The Closing of the American Mind, The Tempting of America illuminates the history of the Supreme Court and the underlying meaning of constitutional controversy. Essential to understanding the relationship between values and the law, it concludes with a personal account of Judge Bork’s chillingly emblematic experiences during the Senate Judiciary Committee’s hearing on his Supreme Court nomination.
Author : Raoul Berger
Publisher : Studies in Jurisprudence and L
Page : 0 pages
File Size : 18,16 MB
Release : 1997
Category : Law
ISBN : 9780865971448
It is Berger's theory that the United States Supreme Court has embarked on "a continuing revision of the Constitution, under the guise of interpretation," thereby subverting America's democratic institutions and wreaking havoc upon Americans' social and political lives. Raoul Berger (1901-2000) was Charles Warren Senior Fellow in American Legal History, Harvard University. Please note: This title is available as an ebook for purchase on Amazon, Barnes and Noble, and iTunes.
Author : J. M. Balkin
Publisher : Harvard University Press
Page : 305 pages
File Size : 30,95 MB
Release : 2011-05-09
Category : History
ISBN : 0674058747
Political constitutions are compromises with injustice. What makes the U.S. Constitution legitimate is Americans’ faith that the constitutional system can be made “a more perfect union.” Balkin argues that the American constitutional project is based in hope and a narrative of shared redemption, and its destiny is still over the horizon.