Book Description

The standard Medicare Part D benefit structure contains a gap in coverage (or so-called "doughnut hole") which requires beneficiaries to pay 100% of the cost for prescription drugs until they reach the catastrophic coverage phase. This coverage gap has been linked to a financial burden for beneficiaries resulting in poor medication adherence and other cost-related access problems. Under the 2010 Affordable Care Act (ACA) reform, the coverage gap has been gradually phasing out since 2011 such that beneficiaries will only pay 25% of drug costs by 2020. This study evaluated the impact of closing the coverage gap under the ACA by conducting three separate studies using data from the 2008-2015 Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey. Outcomes assessed included the utilization of and expenditures for prescription drugs, as well as cost-related access problems. Chapter 3 (Manuscript #1) analyzes trends in the distribution of beneficiaries in each benefit phase, prescription drug utilization, and expenditures among Part D beneficiaries not receiving the Low-Income Subsidy (LIS). After the ACA, the proportion of beneficiaries reaching the catastrophic coverage threshold increased (from 4% in 2010 to 6% in 2015), and they reached the threshold earlier in the year. The overall number of 30-day drug fills also increased after the ACA, although no significant changes in the number of 30-day drug fills were seen among those reaching the catastrophic coverage threshold. Total drug spending steadily increased after the ACA, with the largest increase seen in those reaching the catastrophic threshold; however, out-of-pocket spending significantly decreased among all beneficiaries (17% decrease in 2015 compared to 2009). Chapter 4 (Manuscript #2) evaluates the effects of the ACA coverage gap reform on drug utilization and expenditures using a difference-in-differences study design. Over the first five years after implementation of the ACA, out-of-pocket drug spending significantly decreased among non-LIS beneficiaries (treatment) relative to LIS beneficiaries (control), with growing decreases over time (average decreases of $41 in 2011 versus $135 in 2015). This was particularly noticeable among those who reached the coverage gap but not the catastrophic threshold. Despite seemingly large reductions in cost-sharing in the coverage gap, there were no significant changes in the number of 30-day drug fills and total drug spending after the ACA reform between non-LIS and LIS beneficiaries. Chapter 5 (Manuscript #3) evaluates the effects of the ACA coverage gap reform on cost-related access problems among beneficiaries using a difference-in-differences study design. Cost-related access problems were estimated by the likelihood of having cost-related nonadherence (CRN) or the adoption of drug cost-reduction strategies (CRS) by beneficiaries. Compared to LIS beneficiaries, no significant changes in CRN were seen among non-LIS beneficiaries after the ACA; furthermore, the likelihood of adopting CRS increased by 4 percentage points for non-LIS beneficiaries relative to LIS beneficiaries. Although the ACA reform has helped reduce out-of-pocket drug costs for beneficiaries by gradually reducing the beneficiary cost-sharing rate in the Part D coverage gap, the significant reduction in cost-sharing rate did not translate into an increased use of prescription drugs or resolved cost-related access problems for beneficiaries. Additionally, this study provides evidence of increased Part D spending, which has been a growing concern for the Medicare program. The findings of this study provide empirical evidence on the effects of closing the Part D coverage gap and address gaps in the limited existing literature. Overall, although the ACA decreased out-of-pocket drug costs, this study suggests additional initiatives will be needed to provide better protection against the cost of prescription drugs for Part D beneficiaries.