Rank Tests for Instrumental Variables Regression with Weak Instruments


Book Description

This paper considers tests in an instrumental variables (IVs) regression model with IVs that may be weak. Tests that have near-optimal asymptotic power properties with Gaussian errors for weak and strong IVs have been determined in Andrews, Moreira, and Stock (2006a). In this paper, we seek tests that have near-optimal asymptotic power with Gaussian errors and improved power with non-Gaussian errors relative to existing tests. Tests with such properties are obtained by introducing rank tests that are analogous to the conditional likelihood ratio test of Moreira (2003). We also introduce a rank test that is analogous to the Lagrange multiplier test of Kleibergen (2002) and Moreira (2001).







Efficiency Loss of Asymptotically Efficient Tests in an Instrumental Variables Regression


Book Description

In a model with endogenous regressors, heteroskedastic and autocorrelated (HAC) errors and weak instruments, tests that depend on the data only through the Anderson-Rubin (AR) and Lagrange Multiplier (LM) statistics ignore important information on the regression coefficients. This is in contrast to the homoskedastic case, where these statistics, together with the rank statistic, are one-to-one with the maximal invariant. The information loss with heteroskedastic and/or autocorrelated errors can be so extreme that the LM and conditional quasi-likelihood ratio (CQLR) tests have power close to size when it is trivial to distinguish the null from the alternative hypothesis. The severe loss of power can occur if the Hermitian part of the reduced-form covariance matrix has eigenvalues of opposite signs.The conditional invariant likelihood (CIL) test proposed by Moreira and Ridder (2018) does not suffer this power loss. On the contrary, when the CQLR and LM tests fail, the CIL test can have power close to 1 under the alternative, even if its size is close to 0. This implies that the total variation distance between the null and subsets of the alternative is large, so that it is actually easy to distinguish between these hypotheses. We also show that in the HAC-IV model, there are invariant statistics beyond the triad of AR, LM and rank statistics, so that the latter are not maximal invariant in the HAC case. We conclude that the popular LM and CQLR tests use data inefficiently if the equation errors are HAC.




Testing for Weak Instruments in Linear IV Regression


Book Description

Weak instruments can produce biased IV estimators and hypothesis tests with large size distortions. But what, precisely, are weak instruments, and how does one detect them in practice? This paper proposes quantitative definitions of weak instruments based on the maximum IV estimator bias, or the maximum Wald test size distortion, when there are multiple endogenous regressors. We tabulate critical values that enable using the first-stage F-statistic (or, when there are multiple endogenous regressors, the Cragg-Donald (1993) statistic) to test whether given instruments are weak. A technical contribution is to justify sequential asymptotic approximations for IV statistics with many weak instruments.




Instrumental Variables Regression with Weak Instruments


Book Description

This paper develops asymptotic distribution theory for instrumental variable regression when the partial correlation between the instruments and a single included endogenous variable is weak, here modeled as local to zero. Asymptotic representations are provided for various instrumental variable statistics, including the two-stage least squares (TSLS) and limited information maximum- likelihood (LIML) estimators and their t-statistics. The asymptotic distributions are found to provide good approximations to sampling distributions with just 20 observations per instrument. Even in large samples, TSLS can be badly biased, but LIML is, in many cases, approximately median unbiased. The theory suggests concrete quantitative guidelines for applied work. These guidelines help to interpret Angrist and Krueger's (1991) estimates of the returns to education: whereas TSLS estimates with many instruments approach the OLS estimate of 6%, the more reliable LIML and TSLS estimates with fewer instruments fall between 8% and 10%, with a typical confidence interval of (6%, 14%)




An Introduction to Modern Econometrics Using Stata


Book Description

Integrating a contemporary approach to econometrics with the powerful computational tools offered by Stata, this introduction illustrates how to apply econometric theories used in modern empirical research using Stata. The author emphasizes the role of method-of-moments estimators, hypothesis testing, and specification analysis and provides practical examples that show how to apply the theories to real data sets. The book first builds familiarity with the basic skills needed to work with econometric data in Stata before delving into the core topics, which range from the multiple linear regression model to instrumental-variables estimation.




Admissible Invariant Similar Tests for Instrumental Variables Regression


Book Description

This paper studies a model widely used in the weak instruments literature and establishes admissibility of the weighted average power likelihood ratio tests recently derived by Andrews, Moreira, and Stock (2004). The class of tests covered by this admissibility result contains the Anderson and Rubin (1949) test. Thus, there is no conventional statistical sense in which the Anderson and Rubin (1949) test "wastes degrees of freedom". In addition, it is shown that the test proposed by Moreira (2003) belongs to the closure of (i.e., can be interpreted as a limiting case of) the class of tests covered by our admissibility result. Keywords: Instrumental Variables, Regression, Inference. JEL Classifications: C13, C14, C30, C51, D4, J24, J31.










Weak Instruments in Instrumental Variables Regression


Book Description

When instruments are weakly correlated with endogenous regressors, conventional methods for instrumental variables (IV) estimation and inference become unreliable. A large literature in econometrics has developed procedures for detecting weak instruments and constructing robust confidence sets, but many of the results in this literature are limited to settings with independent and homoskedastic data, while data encountered in practice frequently violate these assumptions. We review the literature on weak instruments in linear IV regression with an emphasis on results for nonhomoskedastic (heteroskedastic, serially correlated, or clustered) data. To assess the practical importance of weak instruments, we also report tabulations and simulations based on a survey of papers published in the from 2014 to 2018 that use IV. These results suggest that weak instruments remain an important issue for empirical practice, and that there are simple steps that researchers can take to better handle weak instruments in applications.