Regulatory Profit Targets and Earnings Management in Initial Public Offerings


Book Description

We examine the extent of earnings management associated with meeting forecasts made in IPO prospectuses in a developing economy where government regulation requires a profit forecast but allow promoters to choose either (1) to provide a profit guarantee or (2) to elect for a moratorium on share transfers for a defined period. Since the manager is mandated to make earnings forecast and there are costs associated with forecast error, we hypothesise that, in the first reporting period following the IPO, managers opting for a profit guarantee will signal their ability to produce a result within the target zone while managers opting for a share moratorium will match that performance to maintain their reputation, with the result that both groups are indistinguishable in the magnitude of earnings management.Using a sample of 92 regulated IPO firms we find a strong negative association between forecast error before earnings management and a firm's discretionary accruals. Our results support the hypotheses, leading to the conclusion that earnings are managed towards the forecast amount, consistent with both the desire not to deviate excessively from the forecast and income smoothing.







A Comparative Analysis of Real and Accrual Earnings Management Around Initial Public Offerings Under Different Regulatory Environments


Book Description

While earnings management around IPOs has been researched in a number of settings, there has been a relative absence of work that analyses the impact of the regulatory environment on such activities. We find that the regulatory environment does impact the real and accrual earnings management activities of IPO firms. Our results show that IPO firms listing on the lightly regulated UK Alternative Investment Market (AIM) have higher (lower) levels of accrual based and sales based (discretionary expenses based) earnings management around the IPO than firms listing on the more heavily regulated Main market in the UK.







The Ernst & Young Guide to the IPO Value Journey


Book Description

Ernst & Young ist einer der führenden Finanzdienstleister in den USA. Dies ist die aktualisierte Version des Leitfadens zum Börsengang 'Ernst & Young Guide to Taking Your Company Public'. Ziel war es, leitende Angestellte anzusprechen, wobei der Schwerpunkt auf Emissionskursen (IPOs - Initial Offering Prices) liegt als Verfahren, das einen bedeutenden Einfluß auf Geschäftsoperationen haben wird. Ein praktisches Fachbuch mit wichtigen Informationen zum Börsengang, einschließlich neuer Arten von IPOs und Internetangeboten. (09/99)




Earnings Management. The Influence of Real and Accrual-Based Earnings Management on Earnings Quality


Book Description

Master's Thesis from the year 2019 in the subject Business economics - Accounting and Taxes, University of Duisburg-Essen, course: Master Thesis, language: English, abstract: This paper delves into various theories and approaches, aiming to define and differentiate earnings management from related concepts such as fraud, expectation management, and impression management. It explores the goals and incentives driving earnings management, including maximizing or minimizing earnings, beating targets, and smoothing. At the onset of the new millennium, corporate scandals rocked the business world, eroding trust in management, boards of directors, and the accounting profession. In response, regulations and policies aimed at enhancing corporate governance and financial reporting were swiftly implemented. The credibility, clarity, and consistency of financial reporting practices play a pivotal role in enabling investors to make informed decisions. Accurate and fair financial performance representations, as opposed to inflated and misleading figures, are essential for market players, including shareholders and creditors. Investors rely on audited financial reports to guide their investment decisions, underscoring the critical importance of accuracy and reliability in publicly available financial disclosures. Auditors, by reducing the risk of material misstatement, ensure the integrity of the information disclosed in a company's financial statements. Management, with the goal of achieving promised targets and ensuring the company's existence, may engage in earnings management as a strategic contribution to corporate policy. Financial reporting serves as a means to distinguish well-performing companies from their counterparts, facilitating efficient resource allocation and empowering stakeholders to make effective decisions. The disclosed earnings results significantly impact a firm's overall business activities and management decisions, particularly in satisfying analysts' expectations, which can influence equity value. While accounting standards play a role, the quality of financial statements is more influenced by company-specific and institutional factors shaping managers' incentives. These factors lead to financial reporting practices being viewed as the outcome of a cost-benefit assessment.







Earnings Quality at Initial Public Offerings


Book Description

Financial reporting around the time of IPOs is consistent with listed firms reporting more conservatively than previously as private firms, consistent with the results in Ball and Shivakumar (2005). We hypothesize that IPO firms supply the higher quality financial reports demanded by public investors, who face higher information asymmetry than private investors. The market mechanisms for enforcing this demand include monitoring by internal and external auditors, boards, analysts, rating agencies, the press and other parties. Once public, firms are subject to greater regulatory scrutiny and penalties. From the point of releasing the public prospectus document onwards, IPO firms face a greater threat of shareholder litigation and regulatory action if they do not meet higher reporting standards. The evidence is overwhelmingly in favor of this hypothesis. We show that the evidence reported by Teoh, Welch and Wong (1998) in support of the alternative hypothesis, that IPO firms opportunistically inflate earnings to influence the IPO price, is unreliable for a variety of reasons. We provide cleaner evidence, from samples of U.K. and U.S. IPOs, that IPO prospectus financials are conservative by several standards. We conjecture that the types of bias we observe in conventional estimates of quot;discretionaryquot; accruals occur in a broad genre of studies on earnings management around large transactions and events.




Regulations, Earnings Management, and Post-IPO Performance


Book Description

In this study, we examine whether government regulatory initiatives in China involving IPO by SOEs may have contributed to opportunistic behaviors by the issuer. We focus on two sets of IPO regulations issued between January 1, 1996 and February 11, 1999: pricing regulations, which stipulate that IPO prices be a function of accounting performance, and penalty regulations, which penalize IPO firms for overly optimistic forecasts. We find that IPO firms that report better pricing-period accounting performance have larger declines in post-IPO profitability, lower first-day stock returns and worse long-run post-IPO stock performance. Furthermore, IPO firms that make overoptimistic forecasts also have lower first-day returns and worse post-IPO stock performance. Using non-core earnings as the proxy for earnings management, we document some evidence that IPO firms that report higher pricing-period accounting performance have engaged in more income-increasing earnings management. Hence, pricing regulations may have induced IPO firms to inflate pricing-period earnings and affect the post-IPO performance negatively. On the other hand, penalty regulations have deterred IPO firms from making overoptimistic earnings forecast and therefore have a positive impact on the behavior of IPO firms.