Religion and Generalised Trust


Book Description

For most Indonesian citizens, Muslims and Christians alike, religion plays an important role in private and public life. Against the backdrop of tacit and overt conflicts between religious groups in Indonesia, this study examines the potential role of religion in building trust between people. To what extent does religion induce or reduce trust between Muslims and Christians? While religious communities are important socialising agencies for moral principles that may encourage trust, religious identification may also be related to distrust towards others; making 'trust' a problematic issue in the context of interreligious relations. This dissertation describes how trust is determined by religion (in both positive and negative ways), and how it can be seen as a crucial concept within the religious meaning system. (Series: ?Interreligious Studies, Vol. 9) [Subject: Religious Studies, Southeast Asian Studies, Sociology







Social Trust and Denominational Concentration


Book Description

This study extends the understanding of the relationship between social trust (specifically, confidence in or reliance on others) and religious homogeneity. Social trust is widely recognized as a valuable individual and collective resource. Hence, there is merit in identifying sources that positively affect the level of trust that individuals exhibit toward others. Religion, founded on the premise of trust, is a major force in influencing social relationships among individuals within and outside of the religious group. Particularized trust is confidence in persons known and familiar to the trustor, whereas generalized trust is a willingness to rely on strangers. Social trust results in meaningful cooperation and collective actions that benefit society. Previous research has shown that religious participation and affiliation are determinants of the level of trust an individual expresses in others. Religious homogeneity within a country, a heretofore ignored aggregate measure of religiosity, represents the diversity of the country's religious affiliations and should be a predictor of the country's level of particularized and generalized trust as expressed by individuals residing in the country. A cross-national survey analysis was undertaken using data from twenty-six Judeo-Christian concentrated countries to examine the effect of religious homogeneity on social trust. Four hypotheses were proposed to predict the relationship between trust and religious homogeneity, thereby aiming to answer the question, "Do individuals in religiously homogeneous countries express higher levels of trust than their counterparts in religiously heterogeneous countries?" Using responses to standard questions on trust from the 2005 World Values Survey (Wave A), four hypotheses were tested. The analysis revealed that countries that were especially high in both religious homogeneity and religious heterogeneity had higher levels of particularized, generalized, and overall trust. The study also showed that countries with moderate religious homogeneity had lower levels of particularized, generalized, and overall trust. The findings of the research validate the argument that religion does influence the level of trust that individuals express regionally through the compounded effect of denominational affiliation and denominational concentration, although the nature of this association is subject to concentration thresholds.




Building Cultures of Trust


Book Description

In Building Cultures of Trust Martin Marty proposes ways to improve the conditions for trust at what might be called the "grassroots" level. He suggests that it makes a difference if citizens put energy into inventing, developing, and encouraging "cultures of trust" in all areas of life--families, schools, neighborhoods, workplaces, and churches. Marty acknowledges that the reality of human nature tends toward trust-breaking, not trust-building--all the more reason, he argues, to develop strategies to bring about improvements incrementally, one small step at a time. --from publisher description




Trusting Others, Trusting God


Book Description

Trusting Others, Trusting God is an investigation of the concepts of moral and religious trust. The question of why or how it is rational to trust anyone has been the typical focus of philosophers, with an underlying assumption that trust must be justified. In most cases, trust (even - or perhaps especially religious trust) is portrayed as irrational. Sheela Pawar argues that a grammatical investigation of the concept of trust can help rectify this mistreatment.




Trust and the Islamic Advantage


Book Description

This cutting-edge analysis of Islamic politics and economics shows how Islam builds trust in communities and serves as a collective identity.




The Oxford Handbook of Social and Political Trust


Book Description

This volume explores the foundations of trust, and whether social and political trust have common roots. Contributions by noted scholars examine how we measure trust, the cultural and social psychological roots of trust, the foundations of political trust, and how trust concerns the law, the economy, elections, international relations, corruption, and cooperation, among myriad societal factors. The rich assortment of essays on these themes addresses questions such as: How does national identity shape trust, and how does trust form in developing countries and in new democracies? Are minority groups less trusting than the dominant group in a society? Do immigrants adapt to the trust levels of their host countries? Does group interaction build trust? Does the welfare state promote trust and, in turn, does trust lead to greater well-being and to better health outcomes? The Oxford Handbook of Social and Political Trust considers these and other questions of critical importance for current scholarly investigations of trust.




Religion and Interpersonal Trust


Book Description

Author's abstract: Several factors including experience, group membership, and religious involvement can have an impact on trust. The purpose of the current research was to examine religion as a possible factor in an individual,s trust behaviors. Researchers hypothesized that (1) individuals who identified themselves as being religious would trust strangers more easily than those who did not identify with a religion, and (2) that individuals would more easily trust strangers if the strangers were presented as being religious. Seventy-two participants were presented with three vignettes and were asked to respond to a series of scales measuring general trust, religiosity, conservatism, social distance, and demographics. Descriptive statistics, a multiple regression analysis, correlations, a mixed ANOVA, a repeated measures ANOVA, and a chi-square analysis were conducted to examine the data. Findings indicate that individuals who identified themselves as being relatively more religious did not report being able to trust strangers more easily than those who were relatively less religious and that individuals reported trusting the strangers more easily if the other person was presented as being religious versus nonreligious.




Trust in Society


Book Description

Trust plays a pervasive role in social affairs, even sustaining acts of cooperation among strangers who have no control over each other's actions. But the full importance of trust is rarely acknowledged until it begins to break down, threatening the stability of social relationships once taken for granted. Trust in Society uses the tools of experimental psychology, sociology, political science, and economics to shed light on the many functions trust performs in social and political life. The authors discuss different ways of conceptualizing trust and investigate the empirical effects of trust in a variety of social settings, from the local and personal to the national and institutional. Drawing on experimental findings, this book examines how people decide whom to trust, and how a person proves his own trustworthiness to others. Placing trust in a person can be seen as a strategic act, a moral response, or even an expression of social solidarity. People often assume that strangers are trustworthy on the basis of crude social affinities, such as a shared race, religion, or hometown. Likewise, new immigrants are often able to draw heavily upon the trust of prior arrivals—frequently kin—to obtain work and start-up capital. Trust in Society explains how trust is fostered among members of voluntary associations—such as soccer clubs, choirs, and church groups—and asks whether this trust spills over into other civic activities of wider benefit to society. The book also scrutinizes the relationship between trust and formal regulatory institutions, such as the law, that either substitute for trust when it is absent, or protect people from the worst consequences of trust when it is misplaced. Moreover, psychological research reveals how compliance with the law depends more on public trust in the motives of the police and courts than on fear of punishment. The contributors to this volume demonstrate the growing analytical sophistication of trust research and its wide-ranging explanatory power. In the interests of analytical rigor, the social sciences all too often assume that people act as atomistic individuals without regard to the interests of others. Trust in Society demonstrates how we can think rigorously and analytically about the many aspects of social life that cannot be explained in those terms. A Volume in the Russell Sage Foundation Series on Trust!--




Segregation and Mistrust


Book Description

Generalized trust – faith in people you do not know who are likely to be different from you – is a value that leads to many positive outcomes for a society. Yet some scholars now argue that trust is lower when we are surrounded by people who are different from us. Eric M. Uslaner challenges this view and argues that residential segregation, rather than diversity, leads to lower levels of trust. Integrated and diverse neighborhoods will lead to higher levels of trust, but only if people also have diverse social networks. Professor Uslaner examines the theoretical and measurement differences between segregation and diversity and summarizes results on how integrated neighborhoods with diverse social networks increase trust in the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, Sweden and Australia. He also shows how different immigration and integration policies toward minorities shape both social ties and trust.