Reports from Joint Select Committees of H.L. and H.C., and Evidence
Author : Great Britain. Parliament. House of Lords
Publisher :
Page : 462 pages
File Size : 12,29 MB
Release : 1901
Category :
ISBN :
Author : Great Britain. Parliament. House of Lords
Publisher :
Page : 462 pages
File Size : 12,29 MB
Release : 1901
Category :
ISBN :
Author : Great Britain. Parliament. House of Lords
Publisher :
Page : 620 pages
File Size : 13,68 MB
Release : 1896
Category :
ISBN :
Author : Great Britain. Parliament. House of Lords
Publisher :
Page : 492 pages
File Size : 13,18 MB
Release : 1899
Category :
ISBN :
Author : Great Britain. Parliament. House of Lords
Publisher :
Page : 568 pages
File Size : 27,54 MB
Release : 1902
Category :
ISBN :
Author : Great Britain. Parliament. House of Lords
Publisher :
Page : 772 pages
File Size : 23,75 MB
Release : 1908
Category :
ISBN :
Author : Great Britain. Parliament. House of Lords
Publisher :
Page : 484 pages
File Size : 43,46 MB
Release : 1908
Category :
ISBN :
Author : Great Britain. Parliament. House of Lords
Publisher :
Page : 590 pages
File Size : 50,40 MB
Release : 1888
Category :
ISBN :
Author : Great Britain. Parliament. House of Lords
Publisher :
Page : 694 pages
File Size : 35,60 MB
Release : 1888
Category :
ISBN :
Author : Great Britain. Her Majesty's Stationery Office
Publisher :
Page : 598 pages
File Size : 12,5 MB
Release : 1977
Category : Government publications
ISBN :
Author : Great Britain: Parliament: Joint Committee on the Draft Deregulation Bill
Publisher : The Stationery Office
Page : 136 pages
File Size : 48,16 MB
Release : 2013-12-19
Category : Business & Economics
ISBN : 9780108551673
Having looked at the Draft Deregulation Bill in some detail and taken evidence from a wide range of witnesses, the Committee does not think it is appropriate for Ministers to be given power to scrap legislation by order on the subjective test that it is 'no longer of practical use'. There is a risk that to give Ministers that power would undermine effective Parliamentary scrutiny. It was also felt unnecessary when the Law Commissions currently have the power to put forward outdated Bills for abolition anyway. The Law Commissions will need to make changes to their working practices in order to produce more frequent and more responsive Statute Law (Repeals) Bills. The Government should work with the Law Commissions to streamline the process for bringing forward these Bills. As for the duty on regulators to have regard to economic growth, whilst this is supported in principle, it is important that it is not used by Government to undermine the independence of regulators in the way it is implemented. It might be helpful if that provision were explicitly included in the Bill