Leadership Laboratory


Book Description







Reserve Officers' Training Corps Program


Book Description

Committee Serial No. 33. Discusses usefulness of Junior ROTC program and considers legislation extending Junior and Senior ROTC programs. Includes Army report "Directory of Army Reserve Officers Training Corps Units and National Defense Cadet Corps Units, School Year 1962-63," Feb. 1963 (p. 6763-6823)










The Army Reserve Officers' Training Corps


Book Description

The Reserve Officers' Training Corps (ROTC) has a proud tradition of service to this country. The national Defense Act of 1916 established the need for a reserve corps. Initially, the program produced a small number of officers. With the passage of the Morrill Act, Reserve Officers' Training Corps programs were established on college campuses throughout the country. The majority of Army Officers who served during World War II, Korea, and Vietnam were graduates of the ROTC program. Today, the Reserve Officer's training Corps produces almost 80% of active duty Army Officers. The caliber of Active duty personnel assigned to ROTC duty has continually improved. Today's ROTC programs are producing outstanding young officers who are college educated and trained to lead soldiers in combat. The future for Army ROTC in America is bright. The establishment of The Reserve Officers' Training Corps Cadet Command as a two-star command is nothing short of revolutionary in its implications of the future of Army ROTC. Information for this paper was gathered using a review of the literature, my experiences as an ROTC cadet, two tours of duty as an ROTC instructor, and discussions with key personnel and students involved in the ROTC Program.













Reserve Officers' Training Corps


Book Description

Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO examined the military services' Reserve Officers' Training Corps (ROTC) programs. GAO found that: (1) due to reductions in officer end strength, Air Force and Army ROTC programs have produced over 9,000 more graduates than needed since 1987; (2) the Navy averted large-scale overproduction of officers by making adjustments to its officer candidate school; (3) to reduce the number of ROTC enrollees in officer schools, both the Air Force and Army released graduates from their military service obligations and delayed graduates' entry into active duty; (4) neither the Air Force nor Army developed a comprehensive plan to efficiently meet reduced needs, and both services will continue to incur additional costs associated with producing too many ROTC graduates; (5) all three services maintained unproductive ROTC units that met congressional criteria for closure; (6) of the 630 ROTC units, 65 were below minimum enrollment guidelines as of fiscal year 1990; (7) the Department of Defense (DOD) did not oversee ROTC program productivity and closure decisions to ensure that services complied with closure guidelines; and (8) DOD lacked a standard cost-reporting system for ROTC.