Stress Among Clinical Psychology Doctoral Students


Book Description

The pressures of attaining a doctoral education among university students are well known. This dissertation examines the experience and reality of doctoral psychology students' perceived stress levels among specific years of a clinical psychology five-year doctoral program at one university. The purpose of this quantitative study is to investigate any differences of student's perceived stress and sample characteristics experienced by year in the clinical doctoral psychology program. The amount of perceived stress a psychology doctoral student experiences may depend on differing variables. Psychosocial factors such as education, work, family, and relationships can detract from or contribute to the presence of either positive or negative stress during these years. Factors that may cause distress may also cause eustress. Doctoral students' response to stressors may impact physiological, cognitive, emotional, and behavioral dimensions. A critical issue concerning stress among doctoral students is its effect on learning and whether students will complete their doctoral program. The goal of this study is to increase knowledge of doctoral students' quality of life during the doctoral process and determine the impact of stress on academic achievement. The findings of this study show that there is no relationship between a set of demographic predictor variables (gender, age, marital/parental status, and year in doctoral program) and the level of stress due to academic concerns, family/financial concerns, or environmental concerns for doctoral students, however, a significant relationship was found between these same predictor variables and level of stress as measured by the Demand and Coping Scale. This study's results may contribute to greater understanding and support from program faculty, and help doctoral students set realistic priorities for balancing study, work and family, and reduce doctoral program attrition rates.




Relationship Among Stress, Coping, Health, and GPA in Clinical Psychology Doctoral Students


Book Description

This study investigated stress, coping, and health as factors related to success as a clinical psychology doctoral student. Previous research has indicated that graduate school is a stressful experience, in which students often feel a lack of control over their environment. It has also been demonstrated that poor coping mechanisms can lead to an increase in the percieved experience of stress. In addition, high stress and poor coping is indicative of poorer physical and mental health. It was hypothesized that students who are more successful in their graduate career would report lower levels of stress, employ more adaptive coping and less maladaptive coping, and be in relatively better health. It was also believed that students who are less successful in their graduate career will report higher levels of stress, employ more maladaptive coping and less adaptive coping, and be in relatively poorer health. One hundred seventeen doctoral student American Psychological Association (APA) members participated in this study. These students were selected as a result of convenience and in an attempt to get a sample from multiple schools in a variety of locations. Participants provided demographic information, a measure to assess student stress, the Brief Cope, and the Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI). In this study the hypothesis failed to be confirmed. However, further analysis demonstrated a relationship between higher levels of stress and higher levels of maladaptive coping. There was also a relationship between lower levels of health and higher levels of maladaptive coping and an association between higher levels of stress and poorer health. This study has implications for the training of doctoral students in clinical psychology as well as the need for stress management interventions.







Self-care for Clinicians in Training


Book Description

"Self-care for Clinicians in Training assists readers in recognizing challenges and stressors and instructs them in maintaining a career-long lifestyle of self-care"--










Examining Perceived Stress and Support in School Psychology Graduate Programs


Book Description

There is a major shortage of school psychologists in the U.S. and to improve this, school psychology graduate programs need to graduate more students (Walcott, Hyson, & Loe, 2017). One consideration for school psychology programs is to recognize the impact that stress has on program completion and to understand how programs can improve the stress levels of their students in order to help them be more successful (Grant-Vallone & Ensher, 2000; Rummell, 2015; Tompkins, Brecht, Tucker, Neander, & Swift, 2016). Studies have been conducted on the importance of support for moderating the impacts of stress for medical students, clinical psychology students, and nursing students (Laschinger, Borgogni, Consiglio, & Read, 2015) but no research has been completed on school psychology graduate students specifically. School psychology is unique in that it is an underrepresented field in psychology. The current study examined the relationship between the perceived stress of school psychology graduate students and the amount of support that their programs offer. This study aimed to determine whether the presence of program provided support system is correlated with perceived level of stress among school psychology graduate students. Furthermore, this study broke down types of program support as they relate to perceived stress. Findings of this study provide direction to school psychology programs attempting to improve the supports that they provide.




Legacy


Book Description

The pressures of attaining a doctoral education among university students are well known. This dissertation examines the experience and reality of doctoral psychology students' perceived stress levels among specific years of a clinical psychology five-year doctoral program at one university. The purpose of this quantitative study is to investigate any differences of student's perceived stress and sample characteristics experienced by year in the clinical doctoral psychology program. The amount of perceived stress a psychology doctoral student experiences may depend on differing variables. Psychosocial factors such as education, work, family, and relationships can detract from or contribute to the presence of either positive or negative stress during these years. Factors that may cause distress may also cause eustress. Doctoral students' response to stressors may impact physiological, cognitive, emotional, and behavioral dimensions. A critical issue concerning stress among doctoral students is its effect on learning and whether students will complete their doctoral program. The goal of this study is to increase knowledge of doctoral students' quality of life during the doctoral process and determine the impact of stress on academic achievement. The findings of this study show that there is no relationship between a set of demographic predictor variables (gender, age, marital/parental status, and year in doctoral program) and the level of stress due to academic concerns, family/financial concerns, or environmental concerns for doctoral students, however, a significant relationship was found between these same predictor variables and level of stress as measured by the Demand and Coping Scale. This study's results may contribute to greater understanding and support from program faculty, and help doctoral students set realistic priorities for balancing study, work and family, and reduce doctoral program attrition rates.




Applied MANOVA and Discriminant Analysis


Book Description

A complete introduction to discriminant analysis--extensively revised, expanded, and updated This Second Edition of the classic book, Applied Discriminant Analysis, reflects and references current usage with its new title, Applied MANOVA and Discriminant Analysis. Thoroughly updated and revised, this book continues to be essential for any researcher or student needing to learn to speak, read, and write about discriminant analysis as well as develop a philosophy of empirical research and data analysis. Its thorough introduction to the application of discriminant analysis is unparalleled. Offering the most up-to-date computer applications, references, terms, and real-life research examples, the Second Edition also includes new discussions of MANOVA, descriptive discriminant analysis, and predictive discriminant analysis. Newer SAS macros are included, and graphical software with data sets and programs are provided on the book's related Web site. The book features: Detailed discussions of multivariate analysis of variance and covariance An increased number of chapter exercises along with selected answers Analyses of data obtained via a repeated measures design A new chapter on analyses related to predictive discriminant analysis Basic SPSS(r) and SAS(r) computer syntax and output integrated throughout the book Applied MANOVA and Discriminant Analysis enables the reader to become aware of various types of research questions using MANOVA and discriminant analysis; to learn the meaning of this field's concepts and terms; and to be able to design a study that uses discriminant analysis through topics such as one-factor MANOVA/DDA, assessing and describing MANOVA effects, and deleting and ordering variables.