Tax Obstruction Crimes


Book Description

This is the online appendix to Townsend, John A., Tax Obstruction Crimes: Is Making the IRS's Job Harder Enough (July 1, 2009). Houston Business and Tax Law Journal, Vol. 9, No. 255, 2009. Available at SSRN: 'https://ssrn.com/abstract=2061018' https://ssrn.com/abstract=2061018The article for this appendix questions the potential mischief that can arise from the notion that conduct which makes the IRS's job harder is an obstruction type crime under the defraud / Klein conspiracy in 18 U.S.C. § 371 or, its tax code counterpart for the single actor, 26 U.S.C. § 7212(a) (the Omnibus Clause). The Appendix goes through some common audit profile lowering examples which might be characterized as making the IRS's job harder. Examples considered are:Example 1: Choosing the Standard Deduction When Itemized Deductions Are LargerExample 2: Claiming Fewer Deductions than Otherwise AvailableExample 3: Variation: Claiming Fewer Charitable DeductionsExample 4: Making the Amount of Charitable Deductions Based on Audit FactorsExample 5: Conforming Deductions to IRS Audit Models.Example 6: Follow the Forms StrategyExample 7: Planning Return Positions Based on the Taxpayer Civil Penalty RulesExample 8: Same Example with Preparer Penalty Rules in PlayExample 9: Failure to Disclose Where Even a Civil Penalty Would Not ApplyExample 10: Drafting Return Disclosure to Lower the Audit ProfileExample 11: Filing a Paper Return to Exploit IRS InefficienciesExample 12: IncorporatingExample 13: Filing a Return on ExtensionExample 14: Filing a Return That Incorrectly States the Economic Position of the TaxpayerExample 15: Resisting in an AuditExample 16: Noncompliance with SummonsExample 17: Noncompliance with Summons (Part 2)Example 18: Variation on Resisting an AuditExample 19: Structuring Transactions for less Visibility on AuditExample 20: Action to Delay via U.S. BankExample 21: Action to Delay via Foreign BankExample 22: Taking a Deduction as Schedule C Rather than Schedule AExample 23: Taking an Nol Carryover to a Later YearExample 24: Declining to Amend a Tax ReturnExample 25: Manipulating the SystemExample 26: Staging a Voluntary Disclosure.




Obstructing by Omission


Book Description

A majority of circuits hold that it is possible to be convicted of corruptly obstructing the administration of the Internal Revenue laws even if there is no pending IRS proceeding to obstruct. Even more strikingly, the Second Circuit recently held that making an omission is sufficient to obstruct the IRS, which means that it is a federal felony to corruptly not maintain records or to corruptly not provide records to an accountant. Despite the obvious potential problems with these issues, there is very little recent scholarship addressing them. In June, the Supreme Court granted certiorari to consider these issues. This article examines the circuit split over whether 26 U.S.C. § 7212(a), interfering with the administration of the Internal Revenue laws, requires that the defendant obstructed a known IRS proceeding. Only the Sixth Circuit has imposed such a requirement, and even that court has twice reversed itself on the issue. Further, the Department of Justice limits charges under § 7212(a) to conduct that is prototypically “obstructive.” These policy limitations have caused only prototypically obstructive cases to reach the courts, and have therefore ensured that constitutional overbreadth challenges to the statute necessarily fail. Notwithstanding the majority of opinions on the issue, this article explains that the logical reading of § 7212(a) requires that, to obstruct the IRS, the defendant must have been aware of a pending IRS proceeding. Without this requirement, other crimes carefully delineated in the federal tax code would become superfluous, and individuals would be subject to a vast new array of previously uncontemplated criminal tax prosecutions. Moreover, this limitation is consistent with the Supreme Court's interpretation of the nearly-identical general obstruction of justice statute. Unless § 7212(a) is limited to conduct that obstructs a pending IRS action, the statute will be unconstitutionally overbroad.




Tax Fraud and Evasion


Book Description




United States Attorneys' Manual


Book Description




Guidelines Manual


Book Description




Criminal Tax Fraud


Book Description










Tax Fraud and Evasion


Book Description