Evaluation of Management Responsibilities in the Air Force Aircraft Modification Program


Book Description

The United States Air Force must conduct an on-going aircraft modification program to maintain a safe and combat-ready aircraft fleet. This large modification program necessitates an intricate management structure to review, approve, co-ordinate, and implement the total program. There is evidence to indicate that misunderstandings of organizational responsibilities exist, which result in frequent deviations from established procedures. This causes program cost growth, stretch-outs, delays, improper decisions, and other time consuming and expensive problems. The report was intended to determine if misunderstandings of assigned responsibilities exist in the management of the Air Force Aircraft Modification Program.




Aircraft Modifications


Book Description










Auditing and Financial Management


Book Description

The U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) is an independent agency that works for Congress. The GAO watches over Congress, and investigates how the federal government spends taxpayers dollars. The Comptroller General of the United States is the leader of the GAO, and is appointed to a 15-year term by the U.S. President. The GAO wants to support Congress, while at the same time doing right by the citizens of the United States. They audit, investigate, perform analyses, issue legal decisions and report anything that the government is doing. This is one of their reports.







United States Air Force Aircraft Modification Process: A System Dynamics Analysis


Book Description

A conceptual model of the Air Force aircraft modification process was developed and validated in this thesis. The model was designed using the system dynamics technology and is a tool to extend the knowledge and understanding of the decision and policy-makers within the modification process. Sources of information used in the development of the model included both literature research and personal interviews. The personal interviews were conducted with Air Force, DOD, OMB, and Congressional people active in the aircraft modification process. Five key issues concerning the behavior of the system were identified and detailed. These issues were: the lack of a systems approach to modification management, the absence of a Class IV requirements approval process, the difficulties of management split between AFSC and AFLC, the priority ranking of modifications by the financial community, and the weaknesses of the process which are currently overcome by strong individuals. Five recommendations for change to the modification process were presented. The recommendations were to establish a requirements review, approval, and ranking process for Class IV modifications, encourage a systems approach to management, improve the credibility and understanding of the process, and encourage competition by several means.