Noninformative Tests of the Unbiased Forward Exchange Rate


Book Description

In this paper a familiar, but unsettling result in the foreign exchange literature is reexamined: that the forward rate is not an unbiased predictor of the future spot rate. The paper outlines why some frequently used tests of unbiasedness are noninformative in the sense that they are incapable of correctly testing the hypothesis. Specifically, many of these tests are based on regressions that suffer from simultaneity bias, resulting in biased and inconsistent estimators. This is true whether the tests are conducted using stationary or nonstationary data. This point is demonstrated both analytically and with simulations. Tests of cointegration, which are not subject to the critique presented in the paper, generally fail to reject unbiasedness.




The Risk Premium, Exchange Rate Expectations, and the Forward Exchange Rate


Book Description

The hypothesis that the forward rate is an unbiased predictor of the future spot rate has been rejected in many empirical studies. The rejection of this hypothesis could occur because market behavior is inconsistent with rational-expectations or because there exists a risk premium. Equations describing the forward premium and the change in the exchange rate are estimated jointly, and tests of both the rational-expectations and no-risk-premium hypotheses are conducted. Empirical estimates, obtained using quarterly data for the yen-dollar exchange rate, reject the rational-expectations hypothesis and suggest that there exists a time-varying risk premium.