A Comparison Study of the Math Achievement Rate of Students in Fourth Grade with Educational Disabilities in the Accelerated School Program and Missouri's Traditional School Program


Book Description

The purpose of this causal-comparative design study was to analyze fourth-grade math achievement of students with educational disabilities in Accelerated Schools Project attendance centers to fourth-grade math achievement of students with educational disabilities in traditional, non-accelerated school programs, in the state of Missouri. The dependent variables for this study were the Missouri Assessment Program (MAP) scaled scores and the TerraNova Survey national percentiles. Achievement scores were from the spring of 2000. This study was divided into two major parts. Part A examined Accelerated School Status and Mobility Status (i.e., attendance in the school less than one year; more than one year). These analyses were studied by means of a 2 x 2 ANOVA to determine if mobility status and school type (i.e., Accelerated Schools Project and traditional school) significantly affected MAP and TerraNova Survey scores. Part B examined Educational Disability Types and Disability Type by School Status using a 2 x 5 factorial ANOVA was used to determine if there were significant differences among different educational disability types and school type (i.e., Accelerated Schools Project and traditional school). Part A analyses found a significant main effect on student performance on the MAP scaled scores, favoring traditional schools. While statistically significant, mean differences were quite small. No significant main effects or interactions were found with respect to the TerraNova Survey . Part B analyses results showed a significant main effect for disability type and an interaction between disability type and school type with respect to the MAP scaled score. The TerraNova Survey analysis revealed a significant main effect for disability type, but not a significant interaction of disability type and school type. While post hoc analysis were not conducted in this study, examination of mean scores revealed appreciably lower achievement scores for students with mental retardation on both measures. In addition, it appeared that students with behavioral disorders scored considerably better in traditional schools while students with mental retardation performed better in Accelerated Schools.










A Nation Deceived


Book Description










Pursuing Excellence


Book Description




A Case Study on the Comparison of Fourth-grade Students' Mathematics Achievement as Evidenced by the Measures of Academic Progress Assessment


Book Description

This dissertation was designed to examine whether fourth-grade students who received instruction in a self-contained setting were more likely to meet their target score on the Measures of Academic Progress (MAP) test than students who were taught in a departmentalized setting. Fourth-grade students in ALPHA School District took the MAP test in the fall and spring of the academic calendar year. Target scores were originated by the Northwest Evaluation Association (NWEA). These target scores showed the typical growth for a student in the particular grade level as calculated by national norms. The MAP test growth norms were very precise. Due to the enormous number of students involved in the norming study, NWEA staff was able to calculate the mean growth of similar groups of students from each grade level (2–10) who scored at each RIT level in the initial testing season. For this study, the researcher focused on students in the fourth grade. -- Fourth-grade students from ALPHA School District were tested in the fall of 2015 and the spring of 2016. Scores of students taking both tests were obtained and categorized into two groups: self-contained and departmentalized. Once this process was completed, the researcher analyzed the target scores to determine whether or not there were significant differences in scores of self-contained and departmentalized classrooms. Teacher participants were asked to respond to a collection of survey questions to determine which factors were key contributors to students finding success in the math program in their classroom structure (self-contained, departmentalized). The researcher followed up by utilizing a group of volunteer interview participants to partake in a brief interview based on the findings to determine the identifiable cultural classroom differences in environments in comparing self-contained and departmentalized settings. -- An analysis of the data determined that all students grew equally well regardless of their target growth and classroom structure. Through a survey, it was determined that self-contained teachers place the highest importance on the factors of human relationships and individualized instruction, while departmentalized teachers place their importance in engaging lessons and content specialization. It was discovered that teachers are better when they teach toward their strengths; that math is most effectively taught in a structured environment where routines are evident; and the value in the importance of engaging students with relevant, creative instruction.







Improving Student Achievement


Book Description

Why do students have different achievement levels across states? Is math achievement improving across states? Differences in average achievement levels across states are mainly traceable to differing family characteristics. However, students from similar families also score differently across states. These differences are related to differences in resource levels and in how resources are spent. States with high spending per pupil, lower pupil-teacher ratios, higher participation in public prekindergarten and higher reported teacher resources have higher achievement. Disadvantaged children are the most sensitive to low resource, and additional resources could substantially their scores. Between-state, rather than within-state, differences in resources appear to be the main reason for inequitable resource levels for students of lower socioeconomic status. The conclusion is that significant math gains are occurring across most states that cannot be traced to resource changes, that the rate of gain varies significantly by state, and that reform efforts are the likely cause of these gains. The results certainly challenge the traditional view of public education as unreformable.