Book Description
This book offers a comprehensive critique of the principle of proportionality and balancing as applied to human and constitutional rights.
Author : Francisco J. Urbina
Publisher : Cambridge University Press
Page : 289 pages
File Size : 15,78 MB
Release : 2017
Category : Law
ISBN : 1107175062
This book offers a comprehensive critique of the principle of proportionality and balancing as applied to human and constitutional rights.
Author : Moshe Cohen-Eliya
Publisher : Cambridge University Press
Page : 183 pages
File Size : 39,44 MB
Release : 2013-06-13
Category : Law
ISBN : 1107021863
A comparison of proportionality, the dominant doctrine in constitutional law worldwide, with the American doctrine of balancing.
Author : Mordechai Kremnitzer
Publisher : Cambridge University Press
Page : 689 pages
File Size : 44,21 MB
Release : 2020-04-30
Category : Law
ISBN : 1108497586
A comparative and empirical analysis of proportionality in the case law of six constitutional and supreme courts.
Author : Niels Petersen
Publisher : Cambridge University Press
Page : 261 pages
File Size : 30,29 MB
Release : 2017-03-02
Category : Law
ISBN : 1107177987
This book uses empirical analysis to show that courts refrain from using the proportionality test as a means of judicial activism.
Author : Grant Huscroft
Publisher : Cambridge University Press
Page : 433 pages
File Size : 30,20 MB
Release : 2014-04-21
Category : Law
ISBN : 1139952870
To speak of human rights in the twenty-first century is to speak of proportionality. Proportionality has been received into the constitutional doctrine of courts in continental Europe, the United Kingdom, Canada, New Zealand, Israel, South Africa, and the United States, as well as the jurisprudence of treaty-based legal systems such as the European Convention on Human Rights. Proportionality provides a common analytical framework for resolving the great moral and political questions confronting political communities. But behind the singular appeal to proportionality lurks a range of different understandings. This volume brings together many of the world's leading constitutional theorists - proponents and critics of proportionality - to debate the merits of proportionality, the nature of rights, the practice of judicial review, and moral and legal reasoning. Their essays provide important new perspectives on this leading doctrine in human rights law.
Author : Federica Giovanella
Publisher : Edward Elgar Publishing
Page : 359 pages
File Size : 26,55 MB
Release : 2017-12-29
Category : Conflict of laws
ISBN : 1785369369
Federica Giovanella examines the on-going conflict between copyright and informational privacy rights within the judicial system in this timely and intriguing book.
Author : Jacco Bomhoff
Publisher : Cambridge University Press
Page : 289 pages
File Size : 12,67 MB
Release : 2013-12-19
Category : Law
ISBN : 1107044413
A comparative and historical account of the origins and meanings of the discourse of judicial 'balancing' in constitutional rights law.
Author : Benedikt Pirker
Publisher :
Page : 0 pages
File Size : 43,35 MB
Release : 2013
Category : Judicial review
ISBN : 9789089521415
Proportionality analysis describes a particular legal technique of resolving conflicts between human rights or constitutional rights and public interests through a process of balancing. However, as a general tendency, the current vivid academic debate on proportionality pays insufficient attention to the institutional context - the question of judicial review. Based on the premise that proportionality analysis is a permissible approach to resolve conflicts between rights and other interests, this book lays out a strategy for courts and tribunals to deal with the challenge of using proportionality analysis in an adequate manner, taking into account their situation and context of judicial review. For this purpose, the book develops the concept of models of judicial review in a first theoretical chapter. These models are then applied to six comparative case studies in German and US constitutional law, the law of the European Convention on Human Rights, European Union law, World Trade Organization law, and international investment law. (Series: European Administrative Law - Vol. 8)
Author : Martin Belov
Publisher : Routledge
Page : 189 pages
File Size : 47,99 MB
Release : 2019-10-16
Category : Law
ISBN : 1000707970
This book examines how the judicialization of politics, and the politicization of courts, affect representative democracy, rule of law, and separation of powers. This volume critically assesses the phenomena of judicialization of politics and politicization of the judiciary. It explores the rising impact of courts on key constitutional principles, such as democracy and separation of powers, which is paralleled by increasing criticism of this influence from both liberal and illiberal perspectives. The book also addresses the challenges to rule of law as a principle, preconditioned on independent and powerful courts, which are triggered by both democratic backsliding and the mushrooming of populist constitutionalism and illiberal constitutional regimes. Presenting a wide range of case studies, the book will be a valuable resource for students and academics in constitutional law and political science seeking to understand the increasingly complex relationships between the judiciary, executive and legislature.
Author : Francisco J. Urbina
Publisher : Cambridge University Press
Page : 0 pages
File Size : 32,12 MB
Release : 2018-06-21
Category : Law
ISBN : 9781316626818
The principle of proportionality, which has become the standard test for adjudicating human and constitutional rights disputes in jurisdictions worldwide has had few critics. Proportionality is generally taken for granted or enthusiastically promoted or accepted with minor qualifications. A Critique of Proportionality and Balancing presents a frontal challenge to this orthodoxy. It provides a comprehensive critique of the proportionality principle, and particularly of its most characteristic component, balancing. Divided into three parts, the book presents arguments against the proportionality test, critiques the view of rights entailed by it, and proposes an alternative understanding of fundamental rights and their limits.