A Limited-scope Review of the Department of Probation, Parole and Pardon Services, Summary


Book Description

This report summarizes the full report. Members of the General Assembly asked the Legislative Audit Council to conduct a review of certain administrative issues at SCDPPPS. The Audit Council reviewed agency hiring and promotion practices, expenses and revenues of the Ignition Interlock Device Program, internal controls over composite bank accounts, and procurement. In addition we reviewed agent caseload and workload use and reporting. We also examined SCDPPPS's methodology for calculating the number of individuals and the expenditures that have been avoided due to the reductions in the offender revocation rate. Finally, we reviewed SCDPPPS's policies and procedures addressing the use of state resources.




A Limited-scope Review of the Department of Probation, Parole and Pardon Services


Book Description

Members of the General Assembly requested a performance review of the S.C. Department of Probation, Parole and Pardon Services (SCDPPPS). The audit objectives were to: Examine SCDPPPS's use of composite bank accounts to ensure that accounts are used effectively and are properly monitored. Determine if SCDPPPS has adequate policies and procedures addressing the use of state resources, particularly regarding state cell phones and computer equipment. Review SCDPPPS's personnel practices, particularly hiring and promotional practices, for compliance with agency policy and state and federal laws. Review the revenues and expenditures of the Ignition Interlock Device program for compliance with agency policy and state law. Review SCDPPPS's caseload and workload standards for appropriateness and accuracy. Review SCDPPPS's compliance with state procurement requirements, particularly with regards to sole source and emergency procurements, as well as the disposal of surplus property. Examine SCDPPPS's methodology for calculating the number of individuals and the expenditures that have been avoided due to the reductions in the revocation rate. The findings are detailed in the report.




A Limited-scope Review of the Department of Probation, Parole and Pardon Services


Book Description

In June 2013, the Legislative Audit Council published an audit of the Department of Probation, Parole and Pardon Services. The report focused on human resources and finance issues, the agency's caseload/workload determinations, and use of agency resources. In the original report, it was found that PPP had not complied with state law and agency policy in the areas of hiring practices and other human resources activities, investigations of employee misconduct, procurement, and finance. Recommendations were made to PPP, the General Assembly, and the Public Benefit Authority, to address reforms needed in these areas. This follow-up report gives and explains the status of those recommendations.







Annual Report


Book Description







Probation and Parole Process, Probation and Parole Bureau, Department of Corrections: Limited Scope Performance Audit


Book Description

This work has been selected by scholars as being culturally important, and is part of the knowledge base of civilization as we know it. This work is in the "public domain in the United States of America, and possibly other nations. Within the United States, you may freely copy and distribute this work, as no entity (individual or corporate) has a copyright on the body of the work. Scholars believe, and we concur, that this work is important enough to be preserved, reproduced, and made generally available to the public. We appreciate your support of the preservation process, and thank you for being an important part of keeping this knowledge alive and relevant.




Revoked


Book Description

"[The report] finds that supervision -– probation and parole -– drives high numbers of people, disproportionately those who are Black and brown, right back to jail or prison, while in large part failing to help them get needed services and resources. In states examined in the report, people are often incarcerated for violating the rules of their supervision or for low-level crimes, and receive disproportionate punishment following proceedings that fail to adequately protect their fair trial rights."--Publisher website.