An Evaluation of Various Measures of High School Performance in Predicting College Achievement for Freshman Nrotc Regular Students


Book Description

The research was designed to investigate the validity of high school performance, measured in a number of different ways, in the prediction of college freshman grade point average. Grades on high school transcripts obtained from 13 NROTC units were transformed to a 15-point grading scale. Statistical analyses were conducted to determine the validity of individual high school course grades and a number of general curriculum areas as predictors of freshman college grade point average. Academic high school grade average, the grade average of liberal arts courses, and overall high school grade average correlated higher with college achievement that the presently operational High School Rating (HSR), although the increase in validity in each case was not statistically significant. None of the other composites of courses or individual course average attained as high a correlation with the criterion as did HSR. In the averages, Foreign Language, History, and Physics, correlated higher with first year college grade point average than did any other indes of high school performance. It was recommended that HSR be retained as a selector for the NROTC Regular program since it is more easily derived than the grade averages investigated in this study. It was further recommended that a new form specifically requesting high school rankin-class be developed in an effort to obtain this statistic for all candidates. A suggested format for such a form was included. (Author).




























Validity of High-School Grades in Predicting Student Success Beyond the Freshman Year


Book Description

High-school grades are often viewed as an unreliable criterion for college admissions, owing to differences in grading standards across high schools, while standardized tests are seen as methodologically rigorous, providing a more uniform and valid yardstick for assessing student ability and achievement. The present study challenges that conventional view. The study finds that high-school grade point average (HSGPA) is consistently the best predictor not only of freshman grades in college, the outcome indicator most often employed in predictive-validity studies, but of four-year college outcomes as well. A previous study, UC and the SAT (Geiser with Studley, 2003), demonstrated that HSGPA in college-preparatory courses was the best predictor of freshman grades for a sample of almost 80,000 students admitted to the University of California. Because freshman grades provide only a short-term indicator of college performance, the present study tracked four-year college outcomes, including cumulative college grades and graduation, for the same sample in order to examine the relative contribution of high-school record and standardized tests in predicting longer-term college performance. Key findings are: (1) HSGPA is consistently the strongest predictor of four-year college outcomes for all academic disciplines, campuses and freshman cohorts in the UC sample; (2) surprisingly, the predictive weight associated with HSGPA increases after the freshman year, accounting for a greater proportion of variance in cumulative fourth-year than first-year college grades; and (3) as an admissions criterion, HSGPA has less adverse impact than standardized tests on disadvantaged and underrepresented minority students. The paper concludes with a discussion of the implications of these findings for admissions policy and argues for greater emphasis on the high-school record, and a corresponding de-emphasis on standardized tests, in college admissions. Three appendixes are included: (1) Descriptive Statistics for Predictor and Outcome Variables; (2) Correlation Matrix of Predictor and Outcome Variables; and (3) Multicollinearity Tolerances of Admissions Variables. (Contains 34 notes and 20 tables.).