Analysis of the FY 2017 Defense Budget


Book Description

The Obama administration’s FY 2017 budget—the eighth and final budget submitted by the administration—requests a total of $678.3 billion in funding for national defense. This CSIS Defense Outlook report analyzes the FY 2017 defense budget request looking at trends in the budget, differences from previous requests, and key issues for policymakers as they consider the budget and begin looking to the next administration.




Analysis of the FY 2017 Defense Budget and Trends in Defense Spending


Book Description

As the last budget request of the Obama Administration, the FY 2017 request largely continues the shift towards greater investment in the high-end capabilities necessary in a new strategic era that holds the potential for great power competition. However, the choices made within the FY 2017 budget reflect the tensions between investments in capability and capacity, and between a global “presence” force and a “surge capability” force. Key areas of analysis include: the political fight about base and overseas contingency defense spending; the projected overall defense spending topline; the FY 2017 Overseas Contingency Operations request and the continued role of OCO funding; trends in past and projected procurement spending, with a particular focus on key aviation and shipbuilding programs; priority RDT&E areas of investment, including the Third Offset Strategy, within a planned decline in RDT&E spending; rising O&M costs, which are crowding out procurement spending;growing military personnel costs and declining end-strength; and defense-related spending outside of DOD’s budget. This report also analyzes the services’ budget trends from FY 2001 to the FY 2017 request, and historical perspectives on defense budget cycles and defense spending relative to GDP.




Analysis of the Fy 2021 Defense Budget


Book Description

Analysis of the FY 2021 Defense Budget from the CSIS Defense Budget Analysis program provides an in-depth assessment of the Trump administration's request for national defense funding in FY 2021. The analysis addresses overall trends in the defense budget, changes in the FY 2021 request, and issues for Congress and the next administration to consider. It also covers the budgets of the National Nuclear Security Administration and the Space Force.







Analysis of the FY 2021 Defense Budget


Book Description

Analysis of the FY 2021 Defense Budget from the CSIS Defense Budget Analysis program provides an in-depth assessment of the Trump administration’s request for national defense funding in FY 2021. The analysis addresses overall trends in the defense budget, changes in the FY 2021 request, and issues for Congress and the next administration to consider. It also covers the budgets of the National Nuclear Security Administration and the Space Force.







Analysis of the FY 2018 Defense Budget


Book Description

Introduction. The Fiscal Year 2018 (FY 2018) defense budget cycle has been unusual in several ways. The budget request was submitted unusually late in the process, coming near the end of May, which makes it the latest a budget has been submitted to Congress since the president was first required to submit budget requests in FY 1923. When the budget was released, DoD also announced that it does not contain a projection for future years (the future years defense program or FYDP) that is normally submitted with a budget. However, many of the budget materials submitted by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) and the Services do contain FYDP projections, prompting the Defense Department Comptroller to warn that, “The secretary [Mattis] has not spent any time at all looking at anything beyond F.Y. ‘18 to date.”1The budget request also came during a year when the Department of Defense (DoD) and much of the rest of the government operated for more than seven months under a continuing resolution (CR). FY 2017 was the longest CR for defense in more than 40 years, which meant that DoD did not yet know the level of funding for FY 2017 when it developed and finalized its FY 2018 request. Further complicating matters, the request exceeds the Budget Control Act (BCA) budget cap for defense by 54 billion. The Obama administration submitted budgets in excess of the caps in three out of the five years that the BCA caps were in effect, but the difference between the request and the cap has not been this large since FY 2014. This budget request was also submitted while several strategy reviews were getting underway, including the Defense Strategy Review, the Nuclear Posture Review, and the Ballistic Missile Defense Review. Each of these reviews could lead to significant changes in future DoD plans and budgets.Given the somewhat unusual circumstances of the FY 2018 budget cycle, this year’s budget analy-sis takes a different approach. Instead of looking at the details of what the budget request funds or does not fund, it focuses on long-term trends in the defense budget and force structure and identifies key issues facing the Defense Department as it prepares for the FY 2019 budget cycle.







National Defense Budgeting and Financial Management


Book Description

The U.S. Department of Defense accounts for over half of federal government discretionary spending and over 3% of GDP. Half of all federal employees work for the Department. The annual budget for the military not only provides for those salaries, it covers the baseline and wartime operating expenses of the force, and hundreds of billions of dollars of investment in new capabilities and technologies. Given the materiality of the defense function and amount of resources it consumes, the processes for budgeting for defense and managing the funds is important to understand. This text provides a fully integrated view of defense budgeting. It takes the position that defense budgeting is a specific instance of public budgeting, and public budgeting is a specific instance of public policy. In order to fully understand how the nation budgets for defense, it first lays a theoretical and conceptual foundation for public policy and public budgeting. That is followed by an assessment of the political and policy context for defense, including the overarching federal budget process and role of Congress in setting defense policy. Only then does the text explore the specifics of defense budgeting: how, by whom, and why the budget is crafted. Beyond the topic of budgeting – formulating, requesting, and legitimating the request for funds – the book tackles financial management topics. Included are discussions of federal appropriations law, funds management, accounting requirements, intragovernmental business transactions, and contemporary topics of defense policy such as funding overseas contingency operations in an era of deficit control legislation. This book is an appropriate reference for both students and practitioners of defense budgeting and financial management. It would also be appropriate in a general public budgeting course. Most public budgeting texts focus on state and municipal governments and there are few that address the federal system. This book fills that gap and provides a specific example of federal budgeting.




The Military Balance 2022


Book Description

Published each year since 1959, The Military Balance is an indispensable reference to the capabilities of armed forces across the globe. It is used by academia, the media, armed forces, the private sector and government. It is an open-source assessment of the military forces and equipment inventories of 171 countries, with accompanying defence economics and procurement data. Alongside detailed country data, The Military Balance assesses important defence issues, by region, as well as key global trends, such as in defence technology and equipment modernisation. This analysis is accompanied by full-colour graphics, including maps and illustrations. With extensive explanatory notes and reference information, The Military Balance is as straightforward to use as it is extensive. The 2022 edition is accompanied by a fullcolour wall chart illustrating security dynamics in the Arctic.