Army Enlisted Personnel Competency Assessment Program: Phase III Pilot Tests


Book Description

"In the early 1990s, the Department of the Army abandoned its Skill Qualification Test (SOT) program due primarily to maintenance, development, and administration costs. This left a void in the Army's capabilities for assessing job performance qualification. To meet this need, the U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences (ARI) instituted a 3-year program of feasibility research related to the development of a Soldier assessment system that is both effective and affordable. The PerformM21 program has two mutually supporting tracks. The first focuses on the design of a testing program and identification of issues related to its implementation. The second track is a demonstration of concept - starting with a prototype core assessment targeted to all Soldiers eligible for promotion to Sergeant, followed by job-specific prototype assessments for several Military Occupational Specialties (MOS). The prototype assessments were developed during the first 2 years of the research program. The present report describes work conducted in the final year of the PerformM21 program, in which five prototype MOS-specific assessments (along with the common core examination) were pilot tested on a sample of specialists/corporals."--Stinet.




Army Enlisted Personnel Competency Assessment Program


Book Description

In the early 1990s, the Department of the Army abandoned its Skill Qualification Test (SQT) program due primarily to maintenance, development, and administration costs. This left a void in the Army's capabilities for assessing job performance qualification. To meet this need, the U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences (ARI) instituted a 3-year program of feasibility research related to the development of a Soldier assessment system that is both effective and affordable. The PerformM21 program has two mutually supporting tracks. The first track focuses on the design of a testing program and identification of issues related to its implementation. The second track is a demonstration of concept, starting with a prototype core assessment targeted at all Soldiers eligible for promotion to Sergeant, followed by job-specific prototype assessments for several Military Occupational Specialties (MOS). The present report describes the second year of the PerformM21 program, in which a core examination was pilot-tested and prototype test content was developed for five MOS. Further consideration also was given to program design features (e.g., delivery models, test frequency). Program design considerations include substantial attention to the ways in which technology could be used to support the program and issues associated with the successful application of such tools.




Army Enlisted Personnel Competency Assessment Program Phase I (Volume II): Demonstration Competency Assessment Program Development Report


Book Description

This report documents and summarizes the activities in developing a prototype test as part of a Demonstration Competency Assessment Program (DCAP) targeted for use as a promotion tool for advancement of Army Soldiers from pay grade E4 to E5. The test consists of four Army wide core content areas: Leadership, Training, Army History and Values, and Basic Soldiering Tasks (Common Tasks). The report outlines the role of the advisory NCO Council (Army Test Program Advisory Team - ATPAT), the development of the test blueprint, and item development and review. It outlines the plans for Phase II: Pilot testing.




Technical Report


Book Description










ARI Research Note


Book Description




Noncommissioned Officer Education System (NCOES)


Book Description

"This research examined the viability of allowing noncommissioned officers (NCOs) to receive NCO Education System (NCOES) credit based on experience or testing-out. Surveys and interviews were completed with 164 participants, varying in rank from Lieutenant Colonel to Staff Sergeant. Participants were serving in duty positions ranging from U.S. Army Training and Doctrine Command School Leaders and staff to actual NCO and Officer course instructors, at six Army installations representing 11 Schools. The majority (58%) agreed that testing-out of selected NCOES content is a viable option and 61% agreed that no credit should be awarded solely for experience. An overwhelming majority (90%) agreed that all NCOs should attend some resident NCOES classes to foster interpersonal relationships, 86% agreed that testing-out should include both hands-on and written components, and 85% agreed that all NCOs, active and reserve, should be handled the same concerning testing-out or receiving equivalent credit. Perspectives differed by rank group and duty position. Participants identified numerous educational, administrative, logistical, and sociological items that could be negatively impacted by testing-out. They also suggested some testing-out procedures that might mitigate potential impacts."--Page i.