Second Series. Cases Decided in the Court of Session from Nov. 13, 1838 ... (to July 19, 1862;-vol. 10-12; in the Court of Session, Teind Court and Court of Exchequer, from July 20, 1848:-vol. 13-24; in the Court of Session, Teind Court, Court of Exchequer and House of Lords, from Nov. 13, 1850). Reported Vol. 1-3 by Alexander Dunlop and Others; Vol. 4-8, by J. M. Bell and Others; Vol. 9, 10, by John Murray and Others; Vol. 11, 12, by George Young and Others; Vol. 13-15, by H. L. Tennent and Others; Vol. 16-19, by Patrick Fraser and Others; Vol. 20-23, by J. S. Milne and Others; Vol. 24, by Norman Macpherson and Others , Etc


Book Description







Cases Decided in the Court of Session, Court of Justiciary, and House of Lords


Book Description

Vols. for 1847/48-1872/73 include cases decided in the Teind Court; 1847/48-1858/59 include cases decided in the Court of Exchequer; 1850/51- included cases decided in the House of Lords; 1873/74- include cases decided in the Court of Justiciary.







The Nobile Officium


Book Description




Model Rules of Professional Conduct


Book Description

The Model Rules of Professional Conduct provides an up-to-date resource for information on legal ethics. Federal, state and local courts in all jurisdictions look to the Rules for guidance in solving lawyer malpractice cases, disciplinary actions, disqualification issues, sanctions questions and much more. In this volume, black-letter Rules of Professional Conduct are followed by numbered Comments that explain each Rule's purpose and provide suggestions for its practical application. The Rules will help you identify proper conduct in a variety of given situations, review those instances where discretionary action is possible, and define the nature of the relationship between you and your clients, colleagues and the courts.




Michigan Court Rules


Book Description




The Chief


Book Description

An incisive biography of the Supreme Court's enigmatic Chief Justice, taking us inside the momentous legal decisions of his tenure so far. John Roberts was named to the Supreme Court in 2005 claiming he would act as a neutral umpire in deciding cases. His critics argue he has been anything but, pointing to his conservative victories on voting rights and campaign finance. Yet he broke from orthodoxy in his decision to preserve Obamacare. How are we to understand the motives of the most powerful judge in the land? In The Chief, award-winning journalist Joan Biskupic contends that Roberts is torn between two, often divergent, priorities: to carry out a conservative agenda, and to protect the Court's image and his place in history. Biskupic shows how Roberts's dual commitments have fostered distrust among his colleagues, with major consequences for the law. Trenchant and authoritative, The Chief reveals the making of a justice and the drama on this nation's highest court.




United States Attorneys' Manual


Book Description