Decentralization and Financial Management Seminars for Cameroon Councils (Capacity Building Project).


Book Description

The amended constitution of the Republic of Cameroon in 1996: Law No. 96-06 of 18 January 1996 amending the Constitution of 2 June 1972, states that Cameroon is a “Unitary and Decentralized State”, Etat Unitaire et Decentralisé in French. Cameroon having been a highly centralized administration from the 1960, the task of running the country as a decentralized entity therefore requires sensitization and clear division of labor. However, most actors at municipal council levels have very limited knowledge of what it takes to run local councils and even where some training has been received; the risk of managing the decentralized institutions within past traditions is still quite high. Mayors have duties, rights and obligations which are clearly spelt out so financial controllers expect them to be audited against the background or the laid down regulations. Unfortunately, the requirements to become mayor or councilor do not include any prior knowledge of bookkeeping, accounting, effective budgeting and, asset misappropriation or auditing. Some of these mayors and councilors ended up in prison and today, a number of them are still serving prison terms. This project christened, Constitutional Awareness and Forensic Aptitude for Councils, CAFAC, has as objective to develop a training program that will help disseminate information on the decentralization process, the duties of the different officials and get the general public to assist the administration by performing the tasks which are required of them. The program will eventually be translated into French and expanded to meet the learners in all parts of Cameroon but at this initial stage, it will focus on council areas in the North West and South West Regions. The training course is subdivided into: a) a course for Regional Councilors and their collaborators, and b) a course for Mayors, Divisional and Sub divisional Councilors. Conclusively, all participants who will benefit from the training would be exemplary financial managers, budget controllers, risk managers and would be able to identify all unnecessary financial outlets that can hinder efficient utilization of resources. Secondly, the council officials will be instructed on the procedures related to searching for and signing cooperation agreements with other councils, creating a council cluster union or twining with institutions from the Northern hemisphere.




Decentralisation and Community Participation


Book Description

This book explores how policies of decentralisation and community participation adopted in Cameroon in 1996 have played out on the ground since 2004. These reforms were carried out amid economic crisis, structural adjustment and political upheaval. At the time, popular sentiment was that change on the economic and political fronts was imperative. However, the ruling elite, some of whom had been shuttling around the state apparatus since independence, feared that succumbing to popular demands for change was tantamount to political suicide, as was the case elsewhere on the continent. These elites thwarted opposition demands for a sovereign national conference to discuss constitutional reform. The Francophone-dominated elite fiercely objected to Anglophone demands for the restoration of the Federal state that was dissolved in 1972. Instead, decentralisation was presented as an authentic forum for grassroots autonomy and municipal councils as credible arenas for community participation in local development. This study adopts an interdisciplinary approach to unearth the permutations of decentralisation and community participation in Cameroon. It explores how local actors have responded to the implementation of state policy of decentralisation. Further, it documents how local issues observed in Bali in the North West Region and Mbankomo in the Central Region of Cameroon impact and are impacted by national policies and processes.




Decentralisation in Commonwealth Africa


Book Description

Through detailed case studies of decentralisation policies in five sub-Saharan African countries - Botswana, Cameroon, Ghana, Mozambique and Tanzania - this book examines the challenges presented, lessons learned, and recommends ways to improve policy implementation.







Governing Africa's Forests in a Globalized World


Book Description

Many countries around the world are engaged in decentralization processes, and most African countries face serious problems with forest governance, from benefits sharing to illegality and sustainable forest management. This book summarizes experiences to date on the extent and nature of decentralization and its outcomes, most of which suggest an underperformance of governance reforms, and explores the viability of different governance instruments in the context of weak governance and expanding commercial pressures over forests. Findings are grouped into two thematic areas: decentralization, livelihoods and sustainable forest management; and international trade, finance and forest sector governance reforms. The authors examine diverse forces shaping the forest sector, including the theory and practice of decentralization, usurpation of authority, corruption and illegality, inequitable patterns of benefits capture and expansion of international trade in timber and carbon credits, and discuss related outcomes on livelihoods, forest condition and equity. The book builds on earlier volumes exploring different dimensions of decentralization and perspectives from other world regions, and distills dimensions of forest governance that are both unique to Africa and representative of broader global patterns. Authors ground their analysis in relevant theory while attempting to distill implications of their findings for policy and practice.







Capacity Building in Africa


Book Description

African countries need to improve the performance of their public sectors if they are going to achieve their goals of growth, poverty reduction, and the provision of better services for their citizens. Between 1995 and 2004, the Bank provided some $9 billion in lending and close to $900 million in grants and administrative budget to support public sector capacity building in Africa. This evaluation assesses Bank support for public sector capacity building in Africa over these past 10 years. It is based on six country studies, assessments of country strategies and operations across the Region, and review of the work of the World Bank Institute, the Institutional Development Fund, and the Bank-supported African Capacity Building Foundation.










Decentralization, Democracy, and Development


Book Description

The question of whether political, fiscal, and administrative decentralization improves government effectiveness is hotly debated among researchers and policy makers. 'Decentralization, Democracy, and Development' contributes to the empirical literature on decentralization and the debate on whether it is a viable and desirable state-building strategy for post-conflict countries. This book is a collection of eight papers written by nine authors who were intimately involved in the complex decentralization reform process in Sierra Leone from 2003 07. During this period, Sierra Leone s government established elected district and urban councils across the country, transferred certain responsibilities for primary services and local investment and some financial resources to the new councils, and invested heavily in building the administrative infrastructure and capacity of the local councils. Compared to most other Sub-Saharan African countries that have embarked upon decentralization, Sierra Leone s progress in building local government capacity and restructuring the fiscal system is enviable. The authors conclude that improved security and public services are possible in a decentralizing country and Sierra Leone s progress would not have been possible without significant effort at fiscal decentralization and intensive investment in local government capacity building. The most critical ingredient for this promising but fragile reform process is the dynamic leadership team in charge of promoting the new institutional framework and their persistent effort to achieve quick improvement in the local government system and public services.