Department of Defense Directive Dodd 5500.7-R Joint Ethics Regulation (Jer) with Change 7 November 2011


Book Description

This publication, Department of Defense Directive DoDD 5500.7-R Joint Ethics Regulation (JER) with Change 7 November 2011, was originally published on August 30th, 1993. It has been updated 7 times, with the most recent changes occurring on November 17th, 2011. This printing includes current version of the directive with all 7 changes implemented.




Joint Ethics Regulation. Change 3


Book Description

THE GENERAL COUNSEL OF THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE AUTHORIZED PAGE CHANGES TO DODD 5500.7-R, 'JOINT ETHICS REGULATION, AUGUST 1993. THESE CHANGES ARE INDICATED IN THIS DOCUMENT.







Joint Ethics Regulation (JER).


Book Description




A Model Ethics Program for a Department of Defense Contracting Office


Book Description

Ethical conduct standards have been a great concern of the Department of Defense (DoD) for decades. This is especially true in how its employees, particularly contracting officials, use them in making an ethical business decision. Most recently, August 30, 1993, DoD reissued the DODD 5500.7, Standards of Conduct and implemented the new DoD 5500.7-R, Joint Ethics Regulation (JER) to 'standardize' all ethical conduct standards. These ethical conduct standards, contained in the JER, represent one standard meant to be followed by all DoD components. This Thesis develops a model ethics program meant for use by all DoD component contracting offices and other entities such as a contracting division of a systems command. It contains standardized program elements used to implement the conduct standards espoused in the JER.




Joint Ethics Regulation (JER). Change 1


Book Description

The General Counsel of the Department of Defense authorized page changes to DoD 55OO. 7-R, 'Joint Ethics Regulation (JER), ' August 1993. These changes are indicated in this document.




A Model Ethics Program for a Department of Defense Contracting Office


Book Description

Ethical conduct standards have been a great concern of the Department of Defense (DoD) for decades. This is especially true in how its employees, particularly contracting officials, use them in making an ethical business decision. Most recently, August 30, 1993, DoD reissued the DODD 5500.7, Standards of Conduct and implemented the new DoD 5500.7-R, Joint Ethics Regulation (JER) to 'standardize' all ethical conduct standards. These ethical conduct standards, contained in the JER, represent one standard meant to be followed by all DoD components. This Thesis develops a model ethics program meant for use by all DoD component contracting offices and other entities such as a contracting division of a systems command. It contains standardized program elements used to implement the conduct standards espoused in the JER.




Business Ethics


Book Description







Gene Drives on the Horizon


Book Description

Research on gene drive systems is rapidly advancing. Many proposed applications of gene drive research aim to solve environmental and public health challenges, including the reduction of poverty and the burden of vector-borne diseases, such as malaria and dengue, which disproportionately impact low and middle income countries. However, due to their intrinsic qualities of rapid spread and irreversibility, gene drive systems raise many questions with respect to their safety relative to public and environmental health. Because gene drive systems are designed to alter the environments we share in ways that will be hard to anticipate and impossible to completely roll back, questions about the ethics surrounding use of this research are complex and will require very careful exploration. Gene Drives on the Horizon outlines the state of knowledge relative to the science, ethics, public engagement, and risk assessment as they pertain to research directions of gene drive systems and governance of the research process. This report offers principles for responsible practices of gene drive research and related applications for use by investigators, their institutions, the research funders, and regulators.