Design of a European Unemployment Benefit Scheme


Book Description

This report constitutes deliverable 6 of the study entitled "Feasibility and Added Value of a European Unemployment Benefits Scheme" commissioned by DG EMPL and carried out by a Consortium led by CEPS. The objective of this deliverable is to examine different possible options for the scope and design of a European Unemployment Benefits Scheme (EUBS henceforth). To this end, the report provides a thorough analysis of the 18 policy options and their main features. Two types of EUBS are distinguished throughout this report: equivalent and genuine schemes (representing 4 and 14 out of the 18 options respectively). For both types, a thorough analysis of the features of the different options is performed. This analysis draws heavily on the related literature, simulations exercises as well as other work that is being done for the project. This report is structured as follows. The second section comprises a general presentation of the 18 policy options. The section clarifies the difference between equivalent and genuine schemes and points out the key features through which both types, and the different options within these types, can be differentiated. The third section presents a comparison of the options with the schemes in other federations, inside and outside the EU. The fourth section of the report constitutes a note on the distribution of unemployment shocks in a range of countries across Europe. In the fifth section, which is the core of this report, the features of which the 18 policy options are composed (i.e. the parameters that define the different schemes) are presented. Some examples of these features are the trigger of the scheme and the eligibility criteria. In the report, a conceptual and operational definition of each feature is put forward and discussed. This involves more details on how each feature was designed and on why certain choices were made in the design process. The sixth section covers the issue of minimum requirements, accession criteria, convergence and related topics. The last section of this report consists of 18 overview tables (fiches, one for each option).




Design of a European Unemployment Benefit Scheme


Book Description

In this extensive report, we assess how a European unemployment benefit scheme (EUBS) could be designed. To this end, we examine 18 EUBS variants, 4 equivalent and 14 genuine schemes, and their key features. Some of these features can also be found in national unemployment benefit schemes, while others are more related to the EUBS context. We analyse the design of a common EUBS in previous literature and combine these insights with results for the legal and operational options as well as constraints and the economic value added obtained as part of our study on the “Feasibility and Added Value of a European Unemployment Benefit Scheme”. All this information is integrated into a summary fiche for each of the 18 EUBS variants studied. In addition, the report deals with a range of policy issues including convergence, minimum requirements and accession criteria.




A European Unemployment Benefit Scheme


Book Description

The recent euro crisis and the dramatic increase of unemployment in some euro countries have triggered a renewed interest in a fiscal capacity for the European Union to stabilize the economy of its member states. One of the proposed instruments is a common European unemployment insurance. In this book Sebastian Dullien from the HTW Berlin provides and evaluates a blueprint for such a scheme. Building on lessons from the unemployment insurance in the United States of America, he outlines how a European unemployment benefit scheme could be constructed to provide significant stabilization to national business cycles, yet without strongly extending social protection in Europe. Macroeconomic stabilization effects and payment flows between countries are simulated and options, potential pitfalls and existing concerns discussed.




The Design of a European Unemployment (Re)Insurance Scheme


Book Description

The American system of unemployment insurance (UI) is often cited as a model for potential European unemployment re-insurance schemes. While oversimplified comparisons are to be avoided, there are lessons Europe can learn from US federal-state relations regarding UI. We distinguish three aspects of the US system: first, in the 1930s the federal government was able to solve a collective action problem that impeded the development of state-level UI programs; second, during the 1950s Congress enacted a federal backstop for depleted state UI trust funds that are used to finance regular UI benefits; third, in the 1970s the federal government added an extra layer of UI to the state system, based on an intergovernmental co-financing of benefits which intensifies during crises and thus reinforces protection and stabilization where and when it is most needed. The second and third aspects now exercise European interest, which is about buttressing national systems with a supranational layer of insurance. The American experience shows that federal-state cooperation has overcome problems of collective action and enhanced stabilization. It proved to be of great importance in the Great Recession to effectively expand the protection of unemployed workers and to backstop state UI programs in a period of high and rising unemployment and thereby to contribute in a relevant way to the stabilization efforts of the Obama Administration. However, there are also some structural weaknesses in the American system. With a view to what might be developed in the EU, we identify two risks when an extra layer of unemployment protection is added at the supranational level. First, depending on the set-up of the system, federal-level financing of UI can lead to retrenchment of state-level efforts in terms of UI schemes and macroeconomic stabilization. Second, state-level retrenchment can lead to divergence between state UI programs. The US UI model is vulnerable to these two risks, although this may not be its main current challenge. Simultaneously, these risks - and the other problems besetting the American model - are not insurmountable. We draw both positive and cautionary lessons from the American experience. A lesson is that minimum requirements regarding generosity and coverage levels of UI programs are fundamental prerequisites for any supranational re-insurance.







Stabilising the European Economic and Monetary Union


Book Description

Most EU Member States are equipped with a set of powerful instruments to mitigate the effect of economic shocks on employment and income. With the inception of the Economic and Monetary Union (EMU), countries have lost control over their monetary policy, which instead is now managed centrally at the EMU-level. Fiscal policy, which comprises important automatic stabilisers such as a country’s unemployment insurance scheme, remained a national competence. EMU does not have such a stabilisation mechanism. In the past, EMU’s dual institutional architecture has been strongly criticised and many have called for reform, especially after the financial crisis starting in 2008 and the subsequent European debt crisis. This weakness was also underlined more recently, in the Five Presidents’ Report “Completing Europe’s Economic and Monetary Union” published in 2015, which proposed to introduce in the longer term a fiscal stabilisation function for EMU. Such automatic stabilisation at the euro area level should improve the cushioning of large macroeconomic shocks and thereby make EMU overall more resilient, provided a significant degree of economic and financial integration is achieved, together with further pooling of decision-making on national budgets and democratic accountability. The exact design of such euro area stabilisers requires more in-depth work on the legal, economic and political preconditions. A European unemployment benefits scheme (EUBS) has long been discussed as one possible response to stabilisation needs, among other potential stabilisation mechanisms. In 2014, the European Commission, following a request from the European Parliament, commissioned an investigation into the feasibility and added value of a European Unemployment Benefit Scheme as a fiscal stabilisation mechanism for the Eurozone (for more details on the project, see Annex 1). This study was conducted by a consortium led by the Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS) and examined 18 EUBS variants (on which more details are provided in Annex 2). It does not represent the Commission’s position. A comparative assessment of the EUBS with other stabilisers, however, was beyond the scope of this study.




Legal Options and Limits for the Establishment of a European Unemployment Benefit Scheme


Book Description

The European legal dimension of an establishment of a European Unemployment Benefit Scheme is only little discussed. Namely the European Commission stated in its communication on 'Strengthening the Social Dimension of the Economic and Monetary Union' in the chapter on EUBS: 'Such measures would require a substantial Treaty change, since, at present, the EU does not have the competence to adopt them, either for the euro area or for the EU as a whole. The EU cannot engage the budgetary responsibilities of its Member States. The EU's current competences are limited, as regards employment, to incentive measures designed to encourage cooperation between Member States and to support their action, excluding any harmonisation (see Article 149 TFEU). As regards social security and social protection, its competence is limited to adopting directives setting minimum requirements for Member States' systems whose fundamental principles and financial equilibrium are set by Member States (see Article 153 TFEU). Given the current framework of competences and the system of own resources of the Treaties, the flexibility clause of Article 352 cannot be used either, as the establishment of macroeconomic stabilisation systems would exceed the general framework of the current Treaties and thus amount to amending the Treaties without following the requisite procedures. In other words, this final stage would require a fundamental overhaul of the Treaties, which would also have to be accompanied -- as detailed in the blueprint -- by commensurate political integration, ensuring democratic legitimacy and accountability.' The legal impossibility to introduce a EUBS within the existing Treaty framework is supported by Fuchs. In contrast to these statements, Kullas and Sohn concluded in a report that a 'stormy day' insurance could be realised on the basis of Article 122(2) TFEU and other equivalent systems on the basis of Article 352(1) TFEU. Eichenhofer, Repasi and Barnard and De Baere consider Article 153 TFEU as possible legal base. Next to these articles and statements, there are, until now, no in-depth legal analyses on possible European Unemployment Benefit Schemes. The present legal analysis refers to the existing Treaties and examines to which extent a EUBS can be established without a Treaty amendment.




A European Unemployment Benefit Scheme


Book Description

This paper aims to frame the debate on a European Unemployment Benefits Scheme (EUBS) as a shock absorber for EU economies around its origins on the one hand, and its most controversial aspects, on the other. The paper focuses on several key aspects of the EUBS, the first being the options for financing the scheme. This can be divided into those requiring the imposition of an ad-hoc tax in member countries and those relying on general contributions from these countries, which can in turn be financed in various ways. Second, it focuses on the extent to which harmonisation of current national unemployment benefit schemes would be needed. Harmonisation implies changing national legislation and practices, which creates political and administrative difficulties. Third, the study examines the problem of schemes generating regular monetary transfers from certain countries to others, and the associated problem of moral hazard. There are two broad ways to solve this problem: ex-ante or ex-post balancing. Fourth, it discusses which countries should join the EUBS. There are arguments for limiting membership to euro-area members, or for extending it to the entire European Union, but participation should in any case be mandatory. Finally, it reviews the costs of the various forms of EUBSs proposed in the literature, concluding that they tend to stay below 1% of the member countries’ aggregate GDP.




Feasibility and Added Value of a European Unemployment Benefit Scheme


Book Description

This report constitutes the synthesis report of a comprehensive study on the “Feasibility and Added Value of a European Unemployment Benefits Scheme”. The aim of the study is to assess the legal and operational feasibility of introducing a European unemployment benefits scheme (EUBS), as well as the economic added value that such as scheme could bring. This study was initiated by the European Parliament and commissioned by the European Commission, Directorate-General for Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion (Contract VC/2015/0006).




A Euro Area wide Unemployment Insurance to Improve Macroeconomic Stability


Book Description

Master's Thesis from the year 2014 in the subject Economics - Finance, grade: 1, Donau-Universität Krems (Department for Management and Economics), course: International Financial Environment, language: English, abstract: The member states of the euro area have delegated the framing of monetary policy to a European Central Bank, while fiscal policy remains in responsibility of the national governments. In a monetary union, counter-cyclical fiscal policy can deliver only limited help to minimize the loss of monetary policy for adjustment to idiosyncratic shocks. As fiscal capacity at EMU level could transfer a significant part of the cyclical aspects of fiscal policy to the su¬pranational level and help the euro area members to focus their fiscal policy on structural balances. A variety of such risk-sharing mechanisms have been suggested in the academic literature. This Master’s Thesis evaluates the concept of euro area wide unemployment insurance, in comparison with cyclical transfers between the Eurozone members based on their business cycle position. The European unemployment insurance scheme surpasses other concepts with regards to the criteria distributional neutrality and transparency, both of which are essential in order to gain support of European policymakers and voters.