Making Medicines Affordable


Book Description

Thanks to remarkable advances in modern health care attributable to science, engineering, and medicine, it is now possible to cure or manage illnesses that were long deemed untreatable. At the same time, however, the United States is facing the vexing challenge of a seemingly uncontrolled rise in the cost of health care. Total medical expenditures are rapidly approaching 20 percent of the gross domestic product and are crowding out other priorities of national importance. The use of increasingly expensive prescription drugs is a significant part of this problem, making the cost of biopharmaceuticals a serious national concern with broad political implications. Especially with the highly visible and very large price increases for prescription drugs that have occurred in recent years, finding a way to make prescription medicinesâ€"and health care at largeâ€"more affordable for everyone has become a socioeconomic imperative. Affordability is a complex function of factors, including not just the prices of the drugs themselves, but also the details of an individual's insurance coverage and the number of medical conditions that an individual or family confronts. Therefore, any solution to the affordability issue will require considering all of these factors together. The current high and increasing costs of prescription drugsâ€"coupled with the broader trends in overall health care costsâ€"is unsustainable to society as a whole. Making Medicines Affordable examines patient access to affordable and effective therapies, with emphasis on drug pricing, inflation in the cost of drugs, and insurance design. This report explores structural and policy factors influencing drug pricing, drug access programs, the emerging role of comparative effectiveness assessments in payment policies, changing finances of medical practice with regard to drug costs and reimbursement, and measures to prevent drug shortages and foster continued innovation in drug development. It makes recommendations for policy actions that could address drug price trends, improve patient access to affordable and effective treatments, and encourage innovations that address significant needs in health care.




Copayments and the Demand for Prescription Drugs


Book Description

Increasing prescription drug cost-sharing by patients - in the form of increasing copayments - is one of the most striking, and controversial, developments in the health sector over recent years. The exact nature and use of copayments by health care insurers continues to be hot topic of debate. This detailed and meticulously researched study is one of the first of its kind: its results suggest that differences in copayments influence choice, shifting market share for these drugs. Differential copayments for medically equivalent alternatives is one strategy insurers use to affect the choice of one drug over another when faced with differing prices. Relative copayments for therapeutically equivalent drugs, imposed by insurers, are shown to have a significant impact on consumer choice – the implication being that physicians are acting in patients’ financial, as well as medical interest. Unlike much work in this area, Copayments and the Demand for Prescription Drugs is not sponsored by any drug company; and its up-to-date results, established on a firm scientific basis, are entirely unbiased. Its results have applications for the private insurance and pharmaceutical sectors as well as the public sector, and it will be of great interest to professionals and researchers in the fields of health economics, economic and healthcare policy-making, and microeconomics: its primary findings are especially critical to the United States public health sector which is on the cusp of providing a prescription drug benefit to nearly forty million elderly Americans.




Does Cost Sharing Affect Compliance?


Book Description

Private insurance for prescription drugs is characterized by two regimes: flat copayments and variable co-insurance. We develop a simple model to show that patient compliance is lower under coinsurance due to uncertainty in cost-sharing. Empirically, we derive comparable models for compliance behavior in the two regimes. Using claims data from nine large firms, we focus our analysis on diabetes, a common chronic condition that leads to severe complications when inappropriately treated. In the coinsurance model, an increase in the coinsurance rate from 20% to 75% resulted in the share of persons who never comply to increase by 9.9%, and reduced the share of fully compliant persons by 24.6%. In the copayment model, an increase in the copayment from $6 to $10 resulted in a 6.2% increase in the share of never-compliers, and a concomitant 9% reduction in the share of full compliers. Similar results hold when the level of cost-sharing is held constant across regimes. While non-compliance reduces expenditures on prescription drugs it may also lead to increases in indirect medical costs due to avertable complications. Using available aggregate estimates of the cost of diabetic complications, we calculate that the $6-$10 increase in copayment would have the direct effect of reducing national drug spending for diabetes by $125 million. However, the increase in non-compliance rates is expected to increase the rate of diabetic complications resulting in an additional $360 million in treatment costs. The results suggest that both private payers and public payers may be able to reduce overall medical costs by switching from coinsurance to copayments in prescription drug plans.




Care Without Coverage


Book Description

Many Americans believe that people who lack health insurance somehow get the care they really need. Care Without Coverage examines the real consequences for adults who lack health insurance. The study presents findings in the areas of prevention and screening, cancer, chronic illness, hospital-based care, and general health status. The committee looked at the consequences of being uninsured for people suffering from cancer, diabetes, HIV infection and AIDS, heart and kidney disease, mental illness, traumatic injuries, and heart attacks. It focused on the roughly 30 million-one in seven-working-age Americans without health insurance. This group does not include the population over 65 that is covered by Medicare or the nearly 10 million children who are uninsured in this country. The main findings of the report are that working-age Americans without health insurance are more likely to receive too little medical care and receive it too late; be sicker and die sooner; and receive poorer care when they are in the hospital, even for acute situations like a motor vehicle crash.




Is Drug Coverage a Free Lunch?


Book Description

"Recently, many US employers have adopted less generous prescription drug benefits. In addition, the U.S. began to offer prescription drug insurance to approximately 42 million Medicare beneficiaries in 2006. We use data on individual health insurance claims and benefit data from 1997-2003 to study the effects of changing consumers' co-payments for prescription drugs on the quantity demanded and expenditure on prescription drugs, inpatient care and outpatient care. We allow for effects both in the year of the co-payment change and in the year following the change. Our results show that increases in prescription drug prices reduce both the use of and spending on prescription drugs. However, consumers substitute the use of outpatient care and inpatient care for prescription drug use, and the expenditure reductions on prescription drugs are largely offset by the increases in other spending"--National Bureau of Economic Research web site.




Effects of Using Generic Drugs on Medicare's Prescription Drug Spending


Book Description

This is a print on demand edition of a hard to find publication. Contents:(1) Overview of the Medicare Prescription Drug Benefit Program: Design of the Medicare Prescription Drug Benefit; Distribution of Spending in Medicare Part D; The Role of Private Plans in Medicare Part D; (2) Generic Drugs in Medicare Part D: Generic Substitution; Therapeutic Substitution; Comparing Potential Savings from Generic and Therapeutic Substitution; (3) Implications of Future Developments: First-Time Generic Entry; New Brand-Name Drugs; Biologics. (4) Appendix: Description of Data Used in This Analysis. Charts and tables.







Cost Sharing Cuts Employers' Drug Spending--but Employees Don't Get the Savings


Book Description

Spending on outpatient prescription drugs has increased at double-digit rates for the past decade and is now the third largest component of health care expenses after hospital care and physician services. In an attempt to control costs, many employers and insurers have adopted incentive-based formularies, in which drugs are placed in different tiers. Under these arrangements, most drugs are covered, but enrollees have different co-payments depending on the tier to which a drug is assigned. Do increased patient cost sharing and formulary restrictions reduce pharmaceutical use and costs? To answer this question, a RAND team led by economist Geoffrey Joyce examined more than 700,000 person-years of data on beneficiaries enrolled in health plans from 25 private employers. The study is the largest ever conducted involving non-elderly patients enrolled in employer-sponsored health plans.




Coverage of drugs under Medicare


Book Description