Do Industry Specialist Auditors Enhance Financial Reporting Quality?


Book Description

This study investigates whether industry specialist auditors add quality to their clients' audited financial statements under the principles-based International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) when compared to non-specialists. It is likely that auditor experience and knowledge plays a more important role in evaluating the overall quality when principles-based IFRS standards are in effect. This study examines the effect of adopting a principles-based standard on the accounting quality of both industry specialist and non-specialist clients and whether joint EU and country industry specialist auditors add additional value relative to auditors that are deemed either EU or country industry specialists only. I also examine if the gap between local gap and IFRS affects accounting quality. The results suggest that the mandatory adoption of IFRS positively affected accounting quality among firms in the European Union countries. This positive effect is equal to between 7 to 9 percent of pre-tax earnings of non-specialist clients. The results show that Country industry specialist clients still provides high accounting quality relative to non-specialists clients in post-adoption period. The gap difference in accounting quality between the country industry specials and non-specialist is decreased from the pre-and post-adoption period. However, the EU industry specialist clients experience a positive effect with the adoption of IFRS. The results suggest that countries with different level of GAAP difference experience different effect on accounting quality with the mandatory adoption of IFRS. While countries with small gap differences benefit from the adoption of IFRS, the EU industry specialist model suggests that countries with large GAAP difference experience the greatest benefit. The results further find that different classification of industry specialist provides different levels of accounting quality. Country only industry specialist clients provide the highest level of accounting quality. EU and country and EU only clients experience positive effects with the mandatory adoption of IFRS and provide similar accounting quality as non-specialist clients. The results of this study are highly relevant, not only in light of the recent waves of IFRS adoption, but also in light of the recent audit reforms in Europe, which include rules that address mandatory audit rotation, dual audits, and market concentration.




The Effect of Audit Firm Specialization on Earnings Management and Quality of Audit Work


Book Description

This paper aims at investigating the effect of industry specialization on the audit quality and earnings quality. It examines the relation between industry specialization and earnings quality, financial reporting quality, and audit quality. The research posits that industry specialization constrains earnings management. In addition, it hypothesized a positive relationship between industry specialization and financial reporting quality. An experiment was conducted in an audit firm with international affiliation in Egypt to test the research hypotheses. The results indicate that there is no significant difference between industry specialist auditors and non-specialists in constraining earnings management. In addition, findings support that financial reporting quality was significantly higher when specialists conducted the audit. The results provide empirical evidence consistent with the hypothesis that auditor with industry specialization improves audit quality. Finally, industry specialization enables auditors to realize the amendments in auditing standards better than non-specialists.




Industry Specialist Auditors and Audit Fees in Family Firms


Book Description

I examine whether and how family firms' unique ownership structure and agency problems affect their choice of industry-specialist auditors and the level of audit fees. Following prior literature, I define family firms as those in which members of the founding family continue to hold positions in top management, sit on the board, or are blockholders. Compared to non-family firms, family firms are subject to less severe Type I agency problems due to family owners' long-term horizon and close monitoring of managers, but face more severe Type II agency conflicts due to the concentrated ownership and excess of control rights over cash flow rights held by family owners. Using data from the S & P 1500 firms, I find that family firms are more likely to appoint industry-specialist auditors and incur lower audit fees than non-family firms. The results suggest that family firms have strong incentives to hire industry specialists to signal the quality of their financial reporting due to the Type II agency problems, and that they have lower assessed audit risk and less demand for external audit services due to the mitigated Type I agency problems. My additional analysis shows that, compared to family firms without dual-class shares, family firms with dual-class shares have higher demand for industry-specialist auditors to signal firms' disclosure quality. Furthermore, my results indicate that, when family members serve as CEOs, firms have a stronger tendency to hire industry specialists and to pay lower audit fees. In addition, although family firms have a higher likelihood of hiring industry-specialist auditors than non-family firms, I find no evidence that family firms purchase more non-audit services from their incumbent auditors.




Auditor Industry Specialization and the Earnings Response Coefficient


Book Description

This study compares the earnings response coefficients of clients of industry specialist and non-specialist auditors. Prior work (e.g., DeAngelo 1981) has suggested that auditors offer different levels of audit quality, in response to client variations in the demand for different levels of audit quality (Watts and Zimmerman 1986). One component of the quality difference across auditors is industry specialization (Craswell et al. 1995). Empirical evidence on the effect of industry specialization on audit quality proxies such as audit fees, auditor litigation and compliance with accounting standards is mixed. This study examines the hypothesis that industry specialization leads to a better quality of audit by comparing the earnings response coefficients of clients audited by industry specialists with those of clients not audited by industry specialists. Teoh and Wong (1993) argue that audit quality is positively associated with the client's quality of earnings and therefore the earnings response coefficient (ERC), which is the responsiveness of the stock market to information about unexpected earnings. They present evidence that one measure of audit quality, auditors' brand-name (Big 6 or not), is positively associated with the ERC. This paper extends this argument by examining the effect of another facet of audit quality, auditor industry specialization, on the ERC. The results suggest that, after controlling for previously established correlates of the ERC, as well as industry affiliation, clients of industry specialist auditors have higher ERCs than clients of non-specialist auditors.




Regulatory Reform


Book Description




Audit Quality


Book Description

Arising from the author’s experience as a practicing CPA, this book is quite different from other research in this field, as it confronts the subject of audit quality from a pragmatic perspective. The first goal of Jonas Tritschler is to develop an audit quality metric on national audit firm level. Financial reporting errors, as detected by the German enforcement institutions during examinations, which subsequently are published in the German Federal Gazette by the involved companies, are the data basis for this measurement. Using the developed audit quality metric, the second goal of this study is to analyze audit quality differences of selected audit firms by comparing their deployed audit input factors such as employee’s competence (ratio of certified professionals to total audit staff), experience of employees (average tenure of employees in years) and client-specific experience (client fluctuation rate). Results indicate a correlation between audit quality according to the developed metric and the operationalized audit input factors mentioned above.




Evidence on Audit Quality Differences Across Big N Audits


Book Description

We provide evidence on the determinants of the choice of an industry specialist auditor and the effect of this choice on cost of equity for a sample of firms that are audited by Big N auditors. We find that firms with more severe conflicts of interest between managers and shareholders are more likely to use an industry specialist auditor. Furthermore, we document that firms that use an industry specialist auditor have a significantly lower cost of equity after controlling for firms' endogenous decision to use an industry specialist auditor.




Audit Firm Industry Specialisation and Analyst Forecast Accuracy


Book Description

My thesis examines whether the extent to which audit firms concentrate their business in particular industries ('audit firm industry specialisation') improves the usefulness of published financial reports for analysts' predictions of future earnings, and whether the strength of any observed association varies in a manner consistent with the existence of a causal relationship between audit quality and analyst forecast accuracy. Prior research presents diametrically opposite predictions and results regarding the directional relationship between audit firm industry specialisation and analyst forecast accuracy. My thesis shows that the conflicting results in the literature arise largely from prior studies' focus on short-horizon (end-of-year) forecast accuracy, which is subject to competing effects related to audit quality, and which in turn renders the resulting empirical models highly sensitive to model specification. I argue that analyst long-horizon (beginning-of-year) forecast accuracy is a more direct measure of the usefulness of published earnings for the prediction of future performance, and demonstrate that regressions using this metric consistently report a significant positive relation between audit firm industry specialisation and forecast accuracy. I then examine whether the observed positive association between audit firm industry specialisation and forecast accuracy varies with factors argued to reflect the relative importance of audit quality to the predictability of earnings. First, I show that the impact of audit firm industry specialisation on forecast accuracy increases with the underlying riskiness of clients' operations (proxied by cash flow volatility and innate accrual quality). I then argue that audit firm industry specialisation should have a greater impact on the forecast accuracy of lower-quality analysts (where quality is proxied by experience, employer size, 'All-Star' status and composite measures), who rely relatively heavily on published earnings when generating forecasts. To this end, I present evidence that audit firm industry specialisation has a greater impact on forecast accuracy for: (1) firm-years where the average 'quality' of analysts covering the firm is lower, and (2) for forecasts issued by individual analysts of lower quality. My results are robust to the use of controls for the endogenous selection of industry specialist auditors. In sum, my study presents evidence that greater audit quality does improve the usefulness of financial statements for the prediction of future earnings.




Audit Quality Determinants and Their Effect on Earnings Management During the Global Financial Crisis


Book Description

The early twenty first century witnessed several accounting scandals that culminated in the collapse of many renown large organizations such as Enron and the bankruptcy filing of WorldCom. These scandals cast doubts on the quality of auditing. As part of the efforts of restoring quality of auditing and earnings reporting, several standards, guidelines, and codes have been imposed by International and Malaysian regulatory bodies. However, those regulatory authorities view audit quality as subjective, multi-dimensional, vast and a complex issue (Financial Reporting Council, 2007; International Auditing and Assurance Standard board, 2011; Canadian Public Accountability Board, 2012), which makes it difficult to define and measure. In order to untangle this multi-dimensional and complex issue, this study conducted a systematic review, maps the audit quality literature and came up with an audit quality framework (AQF). AQF is a comprehensive framework with the inclusion of the International Standard on Quality Control 1 (ISQC 1). The AQF is further enhanced by inculcating qualities from an Islamic perspective. The AQF reveals that the outcome of a quality audit should be reflected in the financial reporting quality, which is proxied by diminished earnings management practices. There is strong evidence that earnings management practices during the abnormal time (financial crisis) differed in terms of magnitude and direction (Mohd-Saleh and Ahmed, 2005; Johl et al., 2007; Iatridis and Dimitras, 2013). Hence, whether earnings management practices in the context of Malaysian listed companies really differ during the recent financial crisis needs to be tested before determining whether audit quality determinants are able to alleviate it. Therefore, this study examines earnings management practices during the recent financial crisis and makes a comparison with the pre-crisis period. In addition, this study investigates the effect of different determinants of audit quality on earnings management practices. The hypotheses of this study were developed and examined based on the related literature, both agency and big bath theories. Data were collected from literature, databases, related regulations and standards (audit quality framework), annual reports (audit quality determinants), and the Bloomberg database (earnings management components). The AQF suggests that audit quality determinants can be categorized into two major dimensions of attributes (i.e. proficiency and morality). The proficiency attributes dimension is related to the ability of the auditor to detect the misstatement, whilst the morality attributes dimension is the willingness of the auditor to report the detected misstatement. The Islamic perspective shows that the two main categories of the AQF (proficiency, morality) are not new and are referred to in the Holy Qur'ān as strength and trustworthiness. Furthermore, Islam emphasizes more on the latter. As for the empirical findings of paired-sample T-tests analysis for 1,189 firm-years, it is revealed that there is a significant decrease of positive earnings management and a significant increase in downwards earnings management during the recent global financial crisis (2009; 2008) compared to before crisis period (2006; 2005). These findings confirm that Malaysian managers apply the big bath strategy during the crisis period. However, the magnitude of earnings management of the Malaysian companies in the recent financial crisis was distinctly lower than those of prior studies (Johl et al., 2007; Iatridis and Dimitras, 2013). Considering this difference, the study tests whether audit quality determinants, as used by prior studies, similarly deterred earnings management practices in the recent crisis in Malaysia. The findings of the regression analysis for the 245 Malaysian listed companies revealed that five out of ten audit quality determinants (i.e. audit firm type, auditor industry specialist, board of directors' size, board of directors' independence, and audit committee independence) play a significant role in restricting earnings management practices. Therefore, the study shows that, by analysing the empirical findings and referring back to the AQF, audit quality determinants related to competent monitoring by expert auditors (proficiency attributes) and independent board of directors and audit committee (morality attributes) deter earnings management practices during the recent financial crisis. However, other audit quality determinants seem ineffective under these circumstances.




Why and How Audits Must Change


Book Description

Here are the essential steps that accounting firms must take to improve audit quality. The author provides detailed coverage of important topics such as risk-based auditing techniques, analytical procedures, technology, and internal controls. After explaining why frequently used audit approaches are inadequate for detecting material fraud, the author: Provides specific and practical guidance to help auditors conduct higher quality audits Offers guidance to financial executives on ways to evaluate their independent audits Describes the steps that accounting firms must take to implement these much-needed changes Order your copy today!