Effect of Short and Long-term Exposure of Lead on Female Mice Reproductive Cycle


Book Description

The quality of human health is strongly affected by the environmental pollution. Environmental toxins, especially heavy metals, have contributed to an increase in the prevalence of several diseases over the last years, including fertility problems and reproductive malfunctions. Lead, the most potent reproductive toxicant, induces miscarriage, abortions, sterility, difficult pregnancies, and fetal malformations. A new study revealed high concentration of lead in the drinking ground water of North Lebanon, estimated to be slightly higher than the limit recommended by the WHO. Four separate experiments were conducted, using both black and white mice, in order to question the consequential alteration affecting the reproductive system due to lead exposure in drinking water, using atomic absorbance spectroscopy (AAS), Immunofluorescence (IF) and Laser Scan Microscopy (LSM). Lead accumulated mainly in the liver, heart, kidney and ovaries. Lead exposure was extremely detrimental at low level on the reproductive system. Our study demonstrated that continuous exposure to even low level of lead contributes to a high accumulation in ovaries. Black mice were more sensitive to lead exposure in terms of estrous cyclicity. However, white mice had a higher tendency to store lead in their various organs and manifest serious complications at the physiological level, mainly in the gastrointestinal system. Lastly, lead was found to accumulate in theca cells, leading to tardy formation of Graafian follicles, delayed ovulation, reduced number and loss of secondary follicles and corpus lutea, ovarian atrophy at 6 ppm PbCl2 concentration. Efforts should be exerted to decrease the risk of lead-induced reproductive illnesses, infertility in particular, and increase the awareness of this harmful substance.







Animal Dispersal


Book Description

4.1.1 Demographic significance Confined populations grow more rapidly than populations from which dispersal is permitted (Lidicker, 1975; Krebs, 1979; Tamarin et at., 1984), and demography in island populations where dispersal is restricted differs greatly from nearby mainland populations (Lidicker, 1973; Tamarin, 1977, 1978; Gliwicz, 1980), clearly demonstrating the demographic signi ficance of dispersal. The prevalence of dispersal in rapidly expanding populations is held to be the best evidence for presaturation dispersal. Because dispersal reduces the growth rate of source populations, it is generally believed that emigration is not balanced by immigration, and that mortality of emigrants occurs as a result of movement into a 'sink' of unfavourable habitat. If such dispersal is age- or sex-biased, the demo graphy of the population is markedly affected, as a consequence of differ ences in mortality in the dispersive sex or age class. Habitat heterogeneity consequently underlies this interpretation of dispersal and its demographic consequences, although the spatial variability of environments is rarely assessed in dispersal studies.




Ecological Impacts of Toxic Chemicals


Book Description

Ecological Impacts of Toxic Chemicals presents a comprehensive, yet readable account of the known disturbances caused by all kinds of toxic chemicals on both aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems. Topics cover the sources of toxicants, their fate and distribution through the planet, their impacts on specific ecosystems, and their remediation by natural systems. Each chapter is written by well-known specialists in those areas, for the general public, students, and even scientists from outside this field. The book intends to raise awareness of the dangers of chemical pollution in a world dominated by industry and globalization of resources. Because the problems are widespread and far reaching, it is hoped that confronting the facts may prompt better management practices at industrial, agricultural and all levels of management, from local to governmental, so as to reduce the negative impacts of chemical contaminants on our planet.




Animal Biomarkers as Pollution Indicators


Book Description

Ecotoxicology is a relatively new scientific discipline. Indeed, it might be argued that it is only during the last 5-10 years that it has come to merit being regarded as a true science, rather than a collection of procedures for protecting the environment through management and monitoring of pollutant discharges into the environment. The term 'ecotoxicology' was first coined in the late sixties by Prof. Truhaut, a toxicologist who had the vision to recognize the importance of investigating the fate and effects of chemicals in ecosystems. At that time, ecotoxicology was considered a sub-discipline of medical toxicology. Subsequently, several attempts have been made to portray ecotoxicology in a more realistic light. Notably, both F. Moriarty (1988) and F. Ramade (1987) emphasized in their books the broad basis of ecotoxicology, encompassing chemical and radiation effects on all components of ecosystems. In doing so, they and others have shifted concern from direct chemical toxicity to man, to the far more subtle effects that pollutant chemicals exert on natural biota. Such effects potentially threaten the existence of all life on Earth. Although I have identified the sixties as the era when ecotoxicology was first conceived as a coherent subject area, it is important to acknowledge that studies that would now be regarded as ecotoxicological are much older. Wherever people's ingenuity has led them to change the face of nature significantly, it has not escaped them that a number of biological con sequences, often unfavourable, ensue.