Resident Undergraduate Charges at California's Public Colleges and Universities. Factsheet 05-01


Book Description

California charges its own residents less to attend its public colleges and universities than it charges nonresidents. All three of California's public postsecondary education segments charge resident students a systemwide enrollment fee. In addition, the California State University and the University of California also charge students mandatory, campus-based fees. These campus-based fees help support student services such as counseling, student union activities, student government, and recreation. California has sought to avoid charging resident students for the direct cost of instruction, which it charges as "tuition" to nonresident students. For the 2004-05 academic year, the California Community Colleges charged resident students $26 per credit unit--an increase from $18 per credit unit assessed in 2003-04. In 2004-05, a full-time California Community College student enrolled in 15 units per term paid $780 in mandatory statewide enrollment fees. This amount is lower than the fees charged by any other state in the nation. The state with the next lowest community college charges is New Mexico, which charges its full-time students $896 per year--nearly 15% more than the current California Community College fee level. In 2004-05, the average amount charged to a full-time resident community college students nationally was $2,324--nearly three times the amount charged by California's community colleges.




What's Wrong with Student Fees?


Book Description

The Academic Senate for California Community Colleges has maintained long-standing support for the no-fee, open-access concept of California's community colleges. This paper documents the history of the introduction of fees and the seemingly inevitable subsequent increases--all of which have been vigorously opposed by the Academic Senate. It makes the case that such fees have betrayed the educational vision of California's 1960 Master Plan for Higher Education--a vision that has served California well. The section on Fundamental Principles provides strong philosophical and practical reasons for the original no-fee concept and argues that it benefits all segments of California by promoting the well-being of the entire state: not just individual citizens, but small and large businesses and the state as a civic and economic institution all benefit immeasurably from community college education. Specific arguments and responses to oppose many of the commonly heard myths and misconceptions in favor of fee increases are included. The paper calls on the Academic Senate to fight for the preservation of California's visionary educational legacy and, more specifically, to press for the roll-back of existing mandatory fees, coupled with enhanced opposition to any further increases. Appendices provide a record of the Academic Senate's resolutions regarding fees and a table that correlates fee increases with the corresponding effect on enrollment. Appended are: (1) Academic Senate Resolutions on Fees and Financial Aid; (2) Chronology of Fees and Enrollment Changes in the California Community Colleges; and (3) California Community College Students: Profiles of Success. (Contains 43 footnotes.).




The Effects of Fluctuations in Enrollment Fees on Student Retention at California Community Colleges


Book Description

A Master Plan for Higher Education in California (1960) identified accessibility as a primary goal for higher education. California community colleges were designed to provide access to students, based on the prevalence of the 112 community colleges and various centers throughout the state, as well as through the guarantee of tuition free higher education. In the 1984-1985 academic year, community colleges circumvented the assurance of tuition-free higher education by charging enrollment fees. The study used data from a Central California community college to determine the impact of enrollment fee fluctuations on student retention. Multiple regression analysis and logistic regression analyses were conducted to help understand how fall-to-fall student retention, student course retention, and successful student course retention were impacted by enrollment fee fluctuations. The results of the study did not find a statistically significant correlation between enrollment fees and fall-to-fall student retention, student course retention, or successful student course retention. The results of the study suggested particular student characteristics were statistically significant predictors of fall-to-fall student retention, student course retention, and successful student course retention.







The Price of Admission, 1983


Book Description