Employee Commute Options Guide


Book Description
















Houston Employee Commute Options Program


Book Description

A specific program of the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments is the Employer Trip Reduction Program (ETR), which is sometimes recognized as the Employee Commute Options (ECO) program. This program required all employers of 100 or more employees in severe and extreme nonattainment areas to develop and implement plans that increase the automobile passenger occupancy (APO) levels of vehicles arriving to the worksite between the hours of 6:00 a.m. and 10:00 a.m. by 25%. The purpose of this current study was to evaluate the potential impact of the ETR program on Houston's mobile source emissions and fuel consumption. A secondary objective was to evaluate the characteristics of the ETR program through plans submitted by affected worksites. The ETR database was used to evaluate the potential effectiveness of the ETR program throughout the eight county nonattainment area to see if it had achieved 100% compliance and met the target average passenger occupancies set in the plan. To supplement this analysis, a survey was conducted to determine the indirect trip rates caused as a result of participation in the ETR program. The database was also used for an initial examination into the preferences of employees and employers in choosing specific transportation control measures. Recommendations for future research, based on the findings from this study, are also presented in the report.










Employee Commute Options Demonstration Project


Book Description

"This Milestone Report, effectively the fifth in a series, focuses on the cost analysis of the ECO demonstration project." From June, 1992 to December, 1993, the City of Chicago participated in a demonstration project of the Employee Commute Options (ECO) program conducted by the Chicago Area Transportation Study (CATS). This project was initiated to provide experience in worksite-based trip reduction programs for employers and public officials in Northeastern Illinois, where a worksite-based trip reduction program mandated by the federal Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 was expected to go into effect in 1994. Because of strong and continued opposition to Employee Commute Options mandates, the legislated program was never implemented in Illinois, and the ECO provision was formally removed from the federal law in 1995. However, the demonstration project provided valuable insight into how employers can voluntarily reduce vehicle travel to their worksites, to combat local traffic congestion, provide commute-related employee benefits, and help reduce pollution from automobile emissions.




Exploring Airport Employee Commute and Parking Strategies


Book Description

Airport employees are vital to the operation of an airport. They staff the airport on a daily basis from well before the first flight operation until after the last flight operation, which at many airports is 24 hours a day, 365 days a year. Airport employees generate a significant number of vehicle trips to and from the airport each day, which impacts air quality, airport traffic conditions, and traffic in the communities surrounding the airport and on the freeway system. The purpose of this report was to determine what is known about airport employee commute patterns and commute modes, what programs are being offered to airport employees by the airport operator or a transportation management association (TMA) to provide them with alternatives to the drive alone commute to work, how progress is being monitored, what is known about the effectiveness of airport employee commute options (ECO) programs, what the challenges are for the providers of such programs, and to research some ECO programs offered by non-airport employers for program elements that may have applicability in the airport environment. This report was accomplished through a literature search of airport employee commute programs, commute programs offered by non-airport employers that may have applicability in the airport environment, and through interviews with four U.S. and one U.K. airport operators (of 16 airports and 3 TMAs identified, 84 percent interviewed) that offer comprehensive airport ECO programs. Each of the five case studies provides an example of how ECO strategies are applied in the airport environment.