Estimating the Half-Life of Theoretically Founded Real Exchange Rate Misalignments


Book Description

This paper models empirically the short and long-term behavior of the real exchange rate misalignment -- a key variable in academic and policy circles. The equilibrium real exchange rate is derived from a theoretical model with intertemporal external equilibrium and internal equilibrium (in traded and non-traded markets) based on the current account dynamics and Harrod-Balassa-Samuelson productivity, respectively. This provides a bridge between theory and empirics that links the real exchange rate and its fundamentals (terms of trade, the ratio of net foreign assets to gross domestic product, and productivity differentials). The paper contributes to the literature by: (a) estimating an unrestricted vector error correction model that examines the short-term dynamics of real exchange rate misalignments and links these deviations with shocks to fundamentals from 1970 to 2010, and (b) computing the speed of reversion of real exchange rate misalignments with respect to a fundamentals-based equilibrium level. The paper reconciles two strands of the empirical literature that estimate the half-life of purchasing power parity deviations: one, the linear adjustment model that renders the consensus half-life estimates of purchasing power parity deviations, and another, the non-linear adjustment model of purchasing power parity deviations. The model estimates the half-life of real exchange rate deviations from their fundamental equilibrium at approximately 2.8 years. Consequently, about 25 percent of the real exchange rate deviation from its equilibrium level is corrected in the next year. Approximately 43 percent of the countries in the sample have a half-life of real exchange rate deviations from equilibrium less than 2.5 years -- which is consistent with predictions from non-linear mean reversion models.










Correcting Real Exchange Rate Misalignment


Book Description

This paper studies the issue of real exchange rate misalignment and the difficulties in settling international real exchange rate disputes. The authors show theoretically that determining when a country should be sanctioned for real exchange rate "manipulations" is difficult: in some situations a country's real exchange rate targeting can be beneficial to other countries, while in others it is not. Regardless, it is difficult to establish whether a misaligned real exchange rate is intentionally manipulated rather than unintentionally caused by other policies or by various distortions in the economy. The paper continues by illustrating the difficulty in measuring real exchange rate misalignment, and provides a critical assessment of existing methodologies. It concludes by proposing a new method for measuring real exchange rate misalignment based on differences in marginal products between producers of tradable and non-tradable goods.




Real Exchange Rate Misalignments and Growth


Book Description

Real exchange rate (RER) misalignment is now a standard concept in international macroeconomic theory and policy. However, there is neither a consensus indicator of misalignment, nor an agreed upon methodology for constructing such an indicator. This paper constructs an indicator of RER misalignment for a large sample of developed and developing countries. This indicator is based on a well-structured but simple extension of an IS-LM model of an open economy. The paper then uses regression analysis to explore whether RER misalignments are related to country growth experiences. Interestingly the work finds that there are important non-linearities in the relationship. Only very high over-valuations" appear to be associated with slower economic growth, while moderate to high (but not very high) under-valuations appear to be associated with more rapid economic growth.







Equilibrium Real Exchange Rate Estimates Across Time and Space


Book Description

Equilibrium real exchange rate and corresponding misalignment estimates differ tremendously depending on the panel estimation method used to derive them. Essentially, these methods differ in their treatment of the time-series (time) and the cross-section (space) variation in the panel. The study shows that conventional panel estimation methods (pooled OLS, fixed, random, and between effects) can be interpreted as restricted versions of a correlated random effects (CRE) model. It formally derives the distortion that arises if these restrictions are violated and uses two empirical applications from the literature to show that the distortion is generally very large. This suggests the use of the CRE model for the panel estimation of equilibrium real exchange rates and misalignments.




Addressing Econometric Issues on How to Construct Theoretical Based Exchange Rate Misalignment Estimates


Book Description

Assessing real effective exchange rate equilibrium is a challenging task. There is no consensus in the literature on which methodologies and norms apply best to tackle real effective exchange rate misalignment estimation. The novelty of our paper consists of showing that different methodologies to assess exchange rate misalignment can be conciliate if a proper well specified and congruent econometric model that satisfies economic based restrictions is analyzed. Under these circumstances it is possible to decompose exchange misalignment into economic meaningful pieces. We criticized Behavioral Equilibrium Exchange Rate approach (BEER) for disregarding a priori trade balance information in a econometric model designed to assess exchange rate misalignment and rely only on net foreign asset and a selected set of fundamentals information. The following points are addressed in the paper: i) explore and test over identifying restrictions implied by economic theory to strength exchange rate misalignment estimates; ii) decompose exchange rate misalignment estimates into economic meaningful pieces; iii) discuss under what conditions trade balance information can help to improve exchange rate assessment using BEER approach; iv) propose a methodology to disentangle what are the sources of differences in exchange rate misalignment estimates by adapting Blinder-Oaxaca decomposition (Blinder, 1973; Oaxaca, 1973) to our problem and v) collect evidence that real effective exchange rate, trade balance and net foreign asset position are cointegrated with more than one cointegrated vector for a group of OECD and emerging market economies. Finally we illustrate possible advantages of our approach by analyzing the Brazilian and Australian cases in detail. In the first case, trade balance information plays an important role in exchange rate assessment. Fundamental Equilibrium Exchange Rate approach (FEER) that focus on current account information to assess exchange rate misalignment and BEER approach provide complementary information to explain exchange rate in the long run. For Australia, real effective exchange does not react strongly to trade imbalances and BEER plays the leading role.




Misalignment of Exchange Rates


Book Description

Economists writing on flexible exchange rates in the 1960s foresaw neither the magnitude nor the persistence of the changes in real exchange rates that have occurred in the last fifteen years. Unexpectedly large movements in relative prices have lead to sharp changes in exports and imports, disrupting normal trading relations and causing shifts in employment and output. Many of the largest changes are not equilibrium adjustments to real disturbances but represent instead sustained departures from long-run equilibrium levels, with real exchange rates remaining "misaligned" for years at a time. Contributors to Misalignment of Exchange Rates address a series of questions about misalignment. Several papers investigate the causes of misalignment and the extent to which observed movements in real exchange rates can be attributed to misalignment. These studies are conducted both empirically, through the experiences of the United States, Great Britain, Japan, and the countries of the European Monetary System, and theoretically, through models of imperfect competition. Attention is then turned to the effects of misalignment, especially on employment and production, and to detailed estimates of the effects of changes in exchange rates on several industries, including the U.S. auto industry. In response to the contention that there is significant "hysteresis" in the adjustment of employment and production to changes in exchange rates, contributors also attempt to determine whether the effects of misalignment can be reversed once exchange rates return to earlier levels. Finally, the issue of how to avoid—or at least control—misalignment through macroeconomic policy is confronted.