Bridge Railing Design Requirements


Book Description

As of January 1, 2020, all new and replacement bridge rails installed on the National Highway System are required to conform to the requirements stipulated in the AASHTO Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware [MASH], 2nd edition (2016).NCHRP Research Report 1109: Bridge Railing Design Requirements, from TRB's National Cooperative Highway Research Program, presents an update to bridge railing design requirements to ensure consistency with the state of knowledge. The update incorporates the recommendations from NCHRP Research Report 1024: Evaluation of Bridge Rail Systems to Confirm AASHTO MASH Compliance and NCHRP Research Report 1078: MASH Railing Load Requirements for Bridge Deck Overhang.







Crash Test and Evaluation of the TxDOT T224 Bridge Rail


Book Description

The objective of thei research was to evaluate the impact performance of the TxDOT T224 Bridge Rail according to the safety performance evaluation guidelines included in AASHTO MASH for test level five (TL 5). This report describes the TxDOT T224 Bridge Rail, documents the impact performance of the rail system according to MASH TL-5 evaluation criteria, and presents recommendations regarding implementation.




Testing and Evaluation of the Florida Jersey Safety Shaped Bridge Rail


Book Description

The objectives of this portion of the project were to: 1) determine if any or all of the three subject variants of the 32-inch (813 mm) Jersey safety shaped bridge railing comply with the requirements of the AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications and National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Report 350 Test Level 4 (TL4), and 2) provide recommended retrofit schemes, if deemed technically and economically feasible, to bring into compliance the railings that do not comply. Full or partial replacement schemes may also be recommended as appropriate. The most direct approach for accomplishing the objectives of this task was to perform a full-scale crash test of the most critical design. If that railing performed satisfactorily, the railing would be acceptable by AASHTO LRFD Specifications. The strength test was selected, NCHRP Report 350 test 4-12, a single-unit van-type truck weighing 17,6211b (8000 kg). The TL-4 vehicle is a single-unit box-van truck impacting the railing at 15 degrees and 49.7 mi/h (80 kmIh). While containment is required, overturning of the vehicle is an acceptable test outcome. However, Test Level 3 (TL-3) is a 4405-lb (2000 kg) pickup impacting the railing at 25 degrees and 62.2 mi/h (l00 kmIh). This test requires both containment and stability, and non-overturning. Since some breakage of the parapet is possible, potential for vehicle snagging is likely. Vehicle snagging can contribute to vehicle instabilities in the redirection sequence and potential rollover. Therefore, researchers chose both TL-4 and TL-3 tests. According to the results of this project, no field retrofits or replacements of the Florida Jersey safety shaped bridge rails, depicted in the Florida DOT Index 799, are warranted since the most critical 32-inch (813 mm) Jersey safety shaped bridge railing complied with the requirements of the AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications and NCHRP Report 350 Test Levels 3 and 4.




Development of a MASH Test Level 4 Open Concrete Bridge Rail


Book Description

An open concrete bridge rail was designed and developed according to safety performance guidelines in the American Association of State Highway Transportation Officials (AASHTO) Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware (MASH) for Test Level 4 (TL-4). Systems designed and developed under previous guidance were studied, and their geometric information and full-scale crash testing performance was studied to establish the geometry of the new bridge rail. Yield-Line Theory and the AASHTO Post and Beam design methods were studied, and a modified version of the AASHTO Post and Beam method was utilized to determine the capacity of the new open concrete bridge rail. Both 36 and 39-in. (914 and 991-mm) tall variants of the new open concrete bridge rail were configured. Both variants incorporated a 27-in. (686-mm) tall by 14-in. (356-mm) wide rail, supported by 36-in. (914-mm) long x 10 in. (254-mm) wide posts in the interior region, and 72-in. (1,829-mm) long posts in the end region. Posts in both regions were separated by a 72-in. (1,829-mm) long gap. Posts in the 36 in. (914 mm) tall variant were 9 in. (229 mm) tall, and posts in the 39-in. (991-mm) tall variant were 12 in. (305 mm) tall. Three bridge deck reinforcement configurations were developed to provide different options of reinforcement patterns that were compatible with the new bridge rail. Three concrete end buttress configurations, each with three different approach guardrail transition (AGT) options, were proposed to provide examples of how to properly transition from guardrails installed off the bridge to the open concrete bridge rail. Three full-scale crash tests were recommended to be conducted under MASH test designation nos. 4-10 through 4-12, with 2,425 lb (1,100 kg), 5,000 lb (2,270 kg), and 22,000 lb (10,000 kg) vehicles to evaluate the safety performance of the open concrete bridge rail.




MASH TL-4 Evaluation of 2019 Mash 2-Tube Bridge Rail


Book Description

The purpose of the tests reported herein was to assess the performance of a new, taller Alaska Multi-State 2-Tube Bridge Rail (re-designated as 2019 MASH 2-Tube Bridge Rail) according to the safety-performance evaluation guidelines included in the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO), Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware (MASH), Second Edition 2016. The crash tests performed were in accordance with MASH Test Level 4 (TL-4), which involves three tests on the 2019 MASH 2-Tube Bridge Rail. This report provides details of the 2019 MASH 2-Tube Bridge Rail, detailed documentation of the crash tests and results, and an assessment of the performance of the 2019 MASH 2-Tube Bridge Rail for MASH TL-4 evaluation criteria.




MASH TL-3 Evaluation of 2019 MASH 2-Tube Bridge Rail Thrie Beam Transition


Book Description

The purpose of the tests reported herein was to assess the performance of the 2019 MASH 2-Tube Bridge Rail Thrie Beam Transition according to the safety-performance evaluation guidelines included in AASHTO MASH. The crash tests were performed in accordance with MASH TL-3, which involves two full-scale crash tests (MASH Tests 3-20 and 3-21). However, MASH states that when there are transitions between two barrier types with different stiffness, one from a more flexible barrier and the other to a more rigid barrier, a full-scale crash test is recommended for both types. Therefore, MASH Test 3-21 was performed at the transition from the thrie beam rail to bridge rail, and at the transition from the W-beam rail to thrie beam rail. This report provides details of the 2019 MASH 2-Tube Bridge Rail Thrie Beam Transition, detailed documentation of the crash tests and results, and an assessment of the performance of the 2019 MASH 2-Tube Bridge Rail Thrie Beam Transition for MASH TL-3 transition evaluation criteria. The 2019 MASH 2-Tube Bridge Rail Thrie Beam Transition performed acceptably for MASH TL-3 transitions.




MASH TL-4 Evauation of the TxDOT Type C2P Bridge Rail


Book Description

The objective of this research was to evaluate the impact performance of the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) Type C2P Bridge Rail according to the safety-performance evaluation guidelines included in the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware (MASH) for Test Level Four (TL-4). This report describes the TxDOT Type C2P Bridge Rail, documents the impact performance of the bridge rail system according to MASH TL-4 evaluation criteria for longitudinal barriers, and presents recommendations regarding implementation. MASH Tests 4-10 and 4-11 evaluate a barrier's ability to successfully contain and redirect passenger vehicles and evaluate occupant risk. MASH Test 4-12 evaluates the structural adequacy of the bridge rail. All three tests were performed on the TxDOT Type C2P Bridge Rail. For Test 4-12, the post welds were not properly fabricated according to the project design drawings. As a result, some post welds in the immediate impact area did rupture from the MASH Test 4-12 truck impact. These ruptured post welds did aggravate the stability of the single unit truck during the test. For subsequent tests, the posts were welded correctly as per the project drawings. The bridge rail posts, with the correct post welds, should only improve the performance of the single unit truck. The TxDOT Type C2P Bridge Rail performed acceptably for MASH TL-4.




MASH TL-3 Crash Testing and Evaluation of the T631 Bridge Rail


Book Description

The Texas Type T631 bridge rail was developed as a low-cost, flexible bridge rail system for TL-2 applications. Many of the features used for the system tested at MxRSF for TL-3 were incorporated into the design developed for this project for MASH TL-2 application. The TxDOT Type T631 bridge rail was designed, developed, and evaluated under MASH TL-2. The objective of this research was to evaluate the impact performance of the new TxDOT Type T631 bridge rail to MASH TL-3. The TxDOT Type T631 bridge rail was intended to serve as a low-cost replacement for the TxDOT Type T6 bridge rail for MASH TL-2 applications. The crash testing was performed in accordance with the requirements of MASH TL-3. The TxDOT T631 Bridge Rail performed acceptably for MASH TL-3.