Evaluation of Rural Guide Signing
Author : H. Gene Hawkins
Publisher :
Page : 200 pages
File Size : 22,33 MB
Release : 1995
Category : Rural roads
ISBN :
Author : H. Gene Hawkins
Publisher :
Page : 200 pages
File Size : 22,33 MB
Release : 1995
Category : Rural roads
ISBN :
Author :
Publisher :
Page : 44 pages
File Size : 36,34 MB
Release : 1992
Category : Highway research
ISBN :
Author :
Publisher :
Page : 106 pages
File Size : 35,77 MB
Release : 1995
Category : Roads
ISBN :
Author :
Publisher :
Page : 558 pages
File Size : 30,81 MB
Release : 1993
Category : Highway engineering
ISBN :
Author :
Publisher :
Page : 474 pages
File Size : 50,66 MB
Release : 2000
Category : Transportation, Automotive
ISBN :
Author : Library of Congress. Exchange and Gift Division
Publisher :
Page : 652 pages
File Size : 36,99 MB
Release : 1994
Category : State government publications
ISBN :
Author :
Publisher :
Page : 886 pages
File Size : 10,71 MB
Release : 1995
Category : Science
ISBN :
Author : American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. Task Force for Roadside Safety
Publisher :
Page : 560 pages
File Size : 11,15 MB
Release : 1989
Category : Roads
ISBN :
Author :
Publisher :
Page : 696 pages
File Size : 20,15 MB
Release : 2010
Category : Highway research
ISBN :
Author :
Publisher :
Page : 256 pages
File Size : 44,63 MB
Release : 2007
Category : Highway communications
ISBN :
The objective of this research project was to determine appropriate guidelines and methodology for evaluating dynamic message sign (DMS) performance. National literature reviews and agency surveys were conducted and synthesized for a critical assessment of the state-of-the practice in DMS performance evaluation. DMS performance metrics were established based upon data availability, time of evaluation (pre-post)), and environment of application (urban/rural). Both qualitative and quantitative DMS benefits were established with examples of associated analysis tools given and discussed. Case studies were conducted along freeway corridors where DMSs had been implemented in both urban (Houston, Texas) and rural (Amarillo, Texas) environments. The results of these case studies highlighted constraints in both data availability and appropriate analysis procedures. Final guidelines and methodology for DMS performance evaluation were produced emphasizing the limitation to assessment of both qualitative and quantitative benefits. A guidebook of DMS performance evaluation procedures was included as Appendix D in the research report.