Effects of the 55 Mph Speed Limit


Book Description




Technologies and Approaches to Reducing the Fuel Consumption of Medium- and Heavy-Duty Vehicles


Book Description

Technologies and Approaches to Reducing the Fuel Consumption of Medium- and Heavy-Duty Vehicles evaluates various technologies and methods that could improve the fuel economy of medium- and heavy-duty vehicles, such as tractor-trailers, transit buses, and work trucks. The book also recommends approaches that federal agencies could use to regulate these vehicles' fuel consumption. Currently there are no fuel consumption standards for such vehicles, which account for about 26 percent of the transportation fuel used in the U.S. The miles-per-gallon measure used to regulate the fuel economy of passenger cars. is not appropriate for medium- and heavy-duty vehicles, which are designed above all to carry loads efficiently. Instead, any regulation of medium- and heavy-duty vehicles should use a metric that reflects the efficiency with which a vehicle moves goods or passengers, such as gallons per ton-mile, a unit that reflects the amount of fuel a vehicle would use to carry a ton of goods one mile. This is called load-specific fuel consumption (LSFC). The book estimates the improvements that various technologies could achieve over the next decade in seven vehicle types. For example, using advanced diesel engines in tractor-trailers could lower their fuel consumption by up to 20 percent by 2020, and improved aerodynamics could yield an 11 percent reduction. Hybrid powertrains could lower the fuel consumption of vehicles that stop frequently, such as garbage trucks and transit buses, by as much 35 percent in the same time frame.




Technical Assistance Report 17-01-TA-SS


Book Description

"The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) reported that 37,461 people died in 2016 on US roads, marking the second year in a row that the number has increased [1]. Many transportation-related agencies have adopted a “Vision Zero” or “Towards Zero Deaths” campaign aiming to eliminate the need for that statistic. Speed can often play a role in fatalities, so setting the proper speed limit for roadways is important in saving lives. American speed limits have a complicated history over the past 50 years, which hinders researchers’ ability to look at much longer stretches of data and draw conclusions about determining the best speed limit strategy. From 1973 to 1987, the maximum speed limit was 55 MPH. After that, Congress raised the allowable limit to 65 MPH. It was not until 1995 that states had full discretion over setting an appropriate limit. Some states raised the speed limit for all vehicles equally – a uniform speed limit (USL). Others raised speeds for trucks less than that of cars – a differential speed limit (DSL). On the surface, the benefit of a DSL seems intuitive, lowering the speeds for big trucks would reduce the severity of accidents. However, it also has the effect of increasing total variance in speed which increases the number of accidents. This report aims to explore the literature published about these issues and to inform decision makers about the factors to be weighed when considering DSL versus USL. It was prepared in response to a request in the 2017 session of the Louisiana House of Representatives where the Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development (DOTD) was asked to “study the safety and operational impacts of differential speed limits on interstate highways” (House Concurrent Resolution 112). Thus, the purpose of this study is to inform the Louisiana Legislature about the documented benefits and costs of a differential speed limit for passenger cars versus larger vehicles specifically with regards to the topics of Safety, Mobility and Operations, Fuel Consumption and Emissions, and Truck Determination as outlined in HCR 112."--Introduction.




Safety Impacts of Different Speed Limits on Cars and Trucks


Book Description

The objectives of this study were to determine whether differential or uniform speed limits are more beneficial to transportation safety and traffic operations on Interstate highways. The approach to achieving this objective was to examine speed and accident data from States employing both types of limits. Speed data were collected in 12 States at rural and urban locations representing all speed limits currently established on the Interstate highway system for cars/trucks, i.e., 55/55 mi/h (89/89 km/h), 65/55 mi/h (105/89 km/h), 65/60 mi/h (105/97 km/h), and 65/65 mi/h (105/105 km/h). Accident data were obtained from nine States which were geographically distributed across the country and representative of all rural Interstate speed limits currently established. For the speed data collected, a number of measures of effectiveness (MOEs) were examined including mean speed, speed variance, compliance, and speed distribution measures. For the accident data collected, types of crashes were examined (e.g., rear-end) along with vehicle type involvement (e.g., car-into-truck) and crash severity. This final report summarizes the effects of uniform and differential speed limits on transportation safety and traffic operations as determined by the examination of speed and accident data.