Field Evaluation of Stripping and Moisture Damage in Asphalt Pavements Treated with Lime and Antistripping Agents


Book Description

This report summarized the results of field evaluation of the effectiveness of lime and various antistripping additives using the following methods: (a) Modified Lottman Method (Tex-531-C) and (b) Boiling Test (Tex-530-C). Core samples were obtained from the field test sections up to 48 months after construction. Field data to date show very little evidence of distress which is directly related to moisture damage or stripping. This was anticipated due to the slow rate of moisture ingress under adequate construction compaction.




Long-term Evaluation of Stripping and Moisture Damage in Asphalt Pavements Treated with Lime and Antistripping Agents


Book Description

This report summarizes the results of a long-term field evaluation of the effectiveness of lime and various antistripping agents. This research study was a continuation of the research carried out between 1986 and 1991 (documented in CTR Research Reports 441-1 and 441-2F). Core samples were obtained from the field test sections and tested in the laboratory based on Test Methods Tex-531-C and AASHTO T283. Test results did not indicate any consistent pattern with regard to effectiveness of certain antistripping additives versus others. The field test sections, treated with antistripping agents and built in eight districts of the Texas Department of Transportation, were monitored for signs of distress during the course of the research study.




Evaluation of Stripping and Moisture Damage in Asphalt Pavements Treated with Lime and Antistripping Agents


Book Description

This report summarizes the results of determining the moisture susceptibility by the primary test methods: (a) Original Lottman Method. (b) Modified Lottman Method (Tex-531-C); (c) Tunniclif f-Root Method; and (d) Boiling Test (Tex-530-C). Comparisons were made between the laboratory mixtures, plant mixtures, and cores obtained from the field test sections to determine the effectiveness of the various antistripping additives and to evaluate the various methods for measuring that effectiveness.







Moisture Damage in Asphalt Concrete


Book Description

This synthesis will be of interest to pavement designers, construction engineers, maintenance engineers, and others interested in avoiding or limiting moisture damage in asphalt concrete. Information is provided on physical and chemical explanations for moisture damage in asphalt concrete, along with a discussion of current practices and test methods for determining or reducing the susceptibility of various asphalt concrete components and mixtures to such damage. Moisture damage in asphalt concrete is a nationwide problem which often necessitates premature replacement of highway pavement surfaces. This report of the Transportation Research Board describes the underlying physical and chemical phenomena responsible for such damage. Current test methods used to determine the susceptibility of asphalt concretes, or their constituents, to moisture damage are described and evaluated. Additionally, current practices for minimizing the potential for moisture damage are examined.







Improved Conditioning and Testing Procedures for HMA Moisture Susceptibility


Book Description

Explores whether combining the environmental conditioning system with the simple performance test would provide a superior procedure for determining the moisture susceptibility of hot-mix asphalt (HMA).




Asphalt Paving Technology 2011


Book Description







Evaluation of Anti-stripping Agents Using the Asphalt Pavement Analyzer


Book Description

Moisture damage of asphalt mixes, better known as stripping, is a major distress affecting pavement performance. AASHTO T 283 (KT-56) has been used by many agencies over the past decade to detect moisture susceptible pavements through the determination of a tensile strength ratio (TSR). Results from AASHTO T 283 (KT-56) have been inconsistent. As a result, there has been increased interest in finding an alternative test method. Preliminary indications reveal that loaded wheel rut testers, such as the Asphalt Pavement Analyzer (APA), have the potential to detect moisture susceptible mixtures. To date no standard test methodology has been developed. The objective of this project was to evaluate the effects of sample preconditioning on APA rut depths and to further evaluate the APA's suitability for predicting moisture susceptible mixtures. Eight different mixes from seven project sites were evaluated with the APA. Samples were tested at 40 deg C using four different preconditioning procedures: dry, soaked, saturated, and saturated with a freeze cycle. The results were compared with TSR values, methylene blue values and sand equivalent. The APA was able to identify every mix with a failing TSR.