Book Description

Utopia has often been defined as an imaginary, secular, rational ideal that marks a break with older, mythic, pre-political forms of social ideality such as paradise, Cokaygne, arcadia, or the Golden Age. The utopian order-whether understood as an expression or critique of emergent capitalist ideology-is conceived as the seed-form of a future commonwealth in which natural scarcity and social conflict are transcended through the rationalization of the production process or the extension of human control over nature. This dissertation examines the social and historical context for the emergence of early modern utopian literature as a genre; it also challenges the dominant narrative of rationalization and disenchantment by showing how paradise and utopia are not discrete stages in the development of an idea but form a structural opposition through which we in the present define our own modernity. This dissertation is divided into three chapters, each exploring a different mode or subtype of utopia-social, scientific, and paradisial. Through a close reading of two influential works of early modern utopian literature-Thomas More's Utopia and Francis Bacon's New Atlantis-alongside John Milton's Paradise Lost, I argue that early modern utopian literature provides an image of the future constructed out of disparate pre-modern cultural forms and modes of production that are brought into contact and projected into a fictional space opened up or made imaginable by the discovery of the New World. Europe's mythic prehistory is made coincident with its early capitalist present; an original, humanized nature or an original form of communal property is juxtaposed with and partially integrated into a rationalized system of labour discipline and knowledge production, animated by an early capitalist ethic of improvement.