Foundation for U.S.-Coalition Partner Operations in a Network-Enabled Environment: Lessons Learned


Book Description

The trend in U.S. operations suggests an increased level of operations with a greater variety of nations as coalition partners in the future than during the Cold War. The trend also suggests that the identity and mix of those partners will continue to be defined shortly before activity commences and be defined substantially by the nature of the situation. Because of our history of involvement with a small number of traditional partners and allies, we tend to approach operations with new partners on a case-by-case, unique basis. We argue that DOD would be well-served if it adopted a modular approach to defining the how-to of coalition operations. Such an approach would necessitate the systematic exploration of each key issue that can critically influence operational results. Such a research approach would necessarily be far-reaching, evolutionary, collaborative, and require a long-term commitment. The thesis for our research is that assessment of the combined U.S.-coalition partner force performance at forward echelons can be used to gauge the overall effectiveness of individual programs and initiatives that address culture, technology standards, organization and doctrine, and policy and law issues pursued to improve network-centric operations with coalition partners. Because operational performance is the final judge of military effectiveness, we advocate protracted, objective experimentation that will serve as the catalyst for progress in addressing culture, technology standards, organization and doctrine, and policy and law issues.




Piecing Together the Network-Centric Puzzle: Using Operational Functions to Analyze Potential Coalition Partners


Book Description

Network Centric Warfare (NCW) proposes to radically enhance the United States future war fighting abilities by shifting from a platform-centric to network-centric military. However, it tends to minimize the challenges involved with seamlessly integrating future coalition partners into the network. Proponents of NCW theory argue that it can enhance the speed of operations, but applying it in a multilateral environment generates friction. This friction results from two conditions, the political desire or necessity to increase the number of coalition partners, and the military requirement to efficiently and effectively integrate these nations into the multinational force. Although the expense of technology, inability to create an integrated command and control structure, need for compatible equipment, integration of differing cultures, inability to share information, and lack of doctrine and training inevitably present challenges to operational efficiency and effectiveness, this does not mean that network-centric operations cannot work in a multinational environment. To overcome these challenges, we must identify those countries capable of being full-fledged partners and those that will have difficulty keeping up. By focusing on their capabilities through the lens of operational functions, joint staffs will have a foundation for the operational planning process. Then, where required, Combatant Commanders will be able to identify shortfalls and help develop these countries through Theater Security Cooperation Plans. Finally, these forces can be incorporated where they will have the least negative impact upon the system. In this paper, historical examples focused on three operational functions - protection, intelligence and logistics - are used to suggest where countries could fit into the NCW environment.




The Implementation of Network-Centric Warfare


Book Description

As the world enters a new millennium, the U.S. military simultaneously enters a new era in warfare -- an era in which warfare is affected by a changing strategic environment and rapid technological change. The United States and its multinational partners are experiencing a transition from the Industrial Age to the Information Age. Simultaneously, it is fully engaged in a global war on terrorism set in a new period of globalization. These changes, as well as the experiences gained during recent and ongoing military operations, have resulted in the current drive to transform the force with network-centric warfare (NCW) as the centerpiece of this effort. This document describes how the tenets and principles of NCW are providing the foundation for developing new warfighting concepts, organizations, and processes that will allow U.S. forces to maintain a competitive advantage over potential adversaries, now and in the future. In sum, the report provides an overview of the ongoing implementation of NCW in the Department of Defense (DoD). A brief description of NCW, including its origins, its central role in force transformation, its tenets and principles, and an implementation strategy, are provided in Chapter 1. An examination of NCW as an emerging theory of war, its relationship to the four domains of Information Age warfare, the growing evidence of its benefits, and the warfighting advantages it can provide are examined in Chapter 2. Chapter 3 focuses on network-centric operations (NCO), including the relationship of NCO to the overarching Joint Operations Concepts (JOpsC), the NCO experience in Afghanistan and Iraq, the development of the NCO Conceptual Framework, and the conduct of NCO case studies. An overview of Joint and Service plans and initiatives to develop and implement network-centric capabilities and the growing investment in these capabilities by our allies and multinational partners are provided in Chapter 4.




Network Science for Military Coalition Operations: Information Exchange and Interaction


Book Description

"This book is structured into sections that look at some of the challenges related to coalition operations in different types of networks, such as communications and information networks and human and cognitive networks, and looks at other issues that impact the operations of coalitions, the management and use of policies across different organizations"--Provided by publisher.







U.S. Security Policy in Asia and the Pacific


Book Description




Networking to Enable Coalition Operations. Volume 1: Executive Summary and Annotated Brief


Book Description

In the past four decades, the United States has been the predominant force in peacekeeping, peacemaking, and combat operations in which it has participated. Two changes are now being experienced. First, post-Cold War contingencies and the Global War on Terrorism have illustrated the increasing importance of constructive coalition relations. Second, as U.S. forces become more network-centric, effective integrated operations with coalition partners are becoming increasingly difficult and dependent upon the ability to share information electronically. In particular, the dynamic nature of air operations demands rapid transfer of data among the forces. However, security concerns prevent full (and often, even partial) access to our networks by others. While workarounds have been implemented, sometimes with excellent combat results, this limited access has impaired the ability of U.S. Forces to truly exploit the diverse capabilities of coalition partners and perhaps reduce our Operations Tempo. This Study addresses the issue of networking for coalition air operations from policy, operational, and technical viewpoints and concludes that improvements in all three areas are essential to effective coalition air operations. The Air Force can take unilateral action to further developments, designate the CAOC as a weapon system, foster demonstrations and experiments to explore CAOC solutions, and improve training and exercises. It can also encourage OSD and Joint levels to review and revise national disclosure policies.




Network Centric Warfare


Book Description

This paper examines how the current military dominance of the US over other states means that only it has the capacity to sustain military activity on a global scale and that other states participating in US-led coalitions must be prepared to work in an 'interoperable' fashion.