Prevalence and Significance of Nonsense Mediated MRNA Decay Coupled with Alternative Splicing in Diverse Eukaryotic Organisms


Book Description

Alternative splicing plays a crucial role in increasing the amount of protein diversity and in regulating gene expression at the post-transcriptional level. In humans, almost all genes produce more than one mRNA isoform and, while the fraction varies, many other species also have a substantial number of alternatively spliced genes. Alternative splicing is regulated by splicing factors, often in a developmental time- or tissue-specific manner. Mis-regulation of alternative splicing, via mutations in splice sites, splicing regulatory elements, or splicing factors, can lead to disease states, including cancers. Thus, characterizing how alternative splicing shapes the transcriptome will lead to greater insights into the regulation of numerous cellular pathways and many aspects of human health. A critical tool for investigating alternative splicing is high-throughput mRNA sequencing (RNA-seq). This technology produces hundreds of millions of short (~100bp) sequencing reads from mRNA molecules and can be used to both discover novel transcripts and to quantify the expression of transcripts. While short read length is a limitation of the technology in its current form, RNA-seq has resulted in the discovery of hundreds of thousands of new transcripts and revealed an increased complexity of the transcriptome via alternative splicing, particularly in human. Here, I used RNA-seq analysis to investigate the global effect of post-transcriptional regulation via alternative splicing coupled to nonsense-mediated mRNA decay and to examine natural human variation in alternative splicing, particularly in genes associated with differential therapeutic drug response. The nonsense-mediated mRNA decay pathway (NMD), which degrades transcripts containing a premature termination codon, plays an important role in post-transcriptional gene regulation when coupled to alternative splicing. If a gene produces an alternative isoform that is targeted by NMD, the mRNA abundance of the protein-producing transcripts can be post-transcriptionally regulated at the alternative splicing level. This has been shown to be important in the regulation of a number of genes, including many of the splicing factors themselves. I have used RNA-seq analysis on cells where NMD has been inhibited to discover alternative isoforms that are NMD targets on a genome-wide scale in human and a number of diverse other eukaryotic species. I found that around 20% of expressed human genes are potentially regulated by alternative splicing coupled to NMD and that they fall into many different functional categories. I also found that hundreds to thousands of genes produce NMD-targeted alternative isoforms in each of frog, zebrafish, fly, fission yeast, and plant, highlighting the prevalence of this relatively under-studied method of gene regulation across the three major branches of eukaryotic organisms. I also gained insight into the features that define NMD targets, which are thought to vary between species although the field is still unclear. I find that an exon-exon junction downstream of the termination codon is a much stronger predictor of NMD than 3’ UTR length in every species except yeast. I also used RNA-seq to investigate alternative splicing in genes of pharmacologic importance. Natural human variation in the expression level and activity of genes involved in drug disposition and action (“pharmacogenes”) can affect drug response and toxicity. Previous studies have relied primarily on microarrays to understand gene expression differences, or have focused on a single tissue or small number of samples. Here, we used RNA-seq to determine the expression levels and alternative splicing of 389 selected pharmacogenes across four pharmacologically relevant tissues (liver, kidney, heart and adipose) and lymphoblastoid cell lines (LCLs), which are used widely in pharmacogenomics studies. Analysis of data from 18 different individuals for each of the 5 tissues (90 samples in total) revealed substantial variation in both expression levels and splicing across samples and tissue types. Comparison with an independent RNA-seq dataset yielded a consistent picture. This in-depth exploration also revealed 183 splicing events in pharmacogenes that were previously not annotated. Overall, this study serves as a rich resource for the research community to inform biomarker and drug discovery and use. In conclusion, the roles of alternative splicing and NMD in the regulation of cellular processes and in human health are wide-open but critical fields of study. Advancements in sequencing technologies have had and will continue to have a huge impact on the studies of these mechanisms. New long-read technologies will likely soon be readily available and promise to greatly increase our ability to accurately interpret RNA-seq results. As the cost of sequencing continues to decrease, more and more data will be generated, allowing for a better view of how the transcriptome varies between individuals and shapes differential disease risks and drug responses.







Networks of Splice Factor Regulation by Unproductive Splicing Coupled With NMD


Book Description

Networks of Splice Factor Regulation by Unproductive Splicing Coupled With NMD by Anna Maria Desai Doctor of Philosophy in Comparative Biochemistry University of California, Berkeley Professor Steven E. Brenner, Chair Virtually all multi-exon genes undergo alternative splicing (AS) to generate multiple protein isoforms. Alternative splicing is regulated by splicing factors, such as the serine/arginine rich (SR) protein family and the heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoproteins (hnRNPs). Splicing factors are essential and highly conserved. It has been shown that splicing factors modulate alternative splicing of their own transcripts and of transcripts encoding other splicing factors. However, the extent of this alternative splicing regulation has not yet been determined. I hypothesize that the splicing factor network extends to many SR and hnRNP proteins, and is regulated by alternative splicing coupled to the nonsense mediated mRNA decay (NMD) surveillance pathway. The NMD pathway has a role in preventing accumulation of erroneous transcripts with dominant negative phenotypes. During the pioneer round of translation, NMD recognizes mRNA transcripts with in-frame premature termination codons (PTCs) and degrades them. Generally, NMD is thought to play a protective role by degrading transcripts that may generate truncated proteins that can be non-functional or deleterious. The NMD pathway also has physiological targets: it impacts gene expression through alternative splicing coupled with NMD. In this mode of regulation, high levels of one splicing factor cause target pre-mRNAs to be spliced into unproductive isoforms and degraded, resulting in lower levels of the spliced RNAs. Interestingly, many splicing factors undergo this mode of regulation. For example, SR proteins SRSF1, SRSR2, SRSF3, and SRSF7 are known to auto-regulate their own expression by coupling alternative splicing and NMD. In addition, splice factors hnRNP L and PTB are regulated in the same manner. Evidence also exists that splicing factors cross regulate each other via NMD. Since all 12 canonical human SR factors and many hnRNP factors have at least one isoform that contains evolutionarily conserved in-frame PTC, it is possible that this mode of gene regulation extends to all SR splicing factors, many hnRNP factors, and even beyond, forming a regulatory network that is dependent upon NMD. Approximately 18% of expressed genes are reported to be natural targets of NMD, yet it still remains unclear why the human genome would express mRNAs that are immediately degraded by the NMD pathway. It is especially intriguing that splicing factors, which are responsible for the entire proteomic diversity, are enriched in this pool of natural NMD targets. To date, there has been no comprehensive and systematic study of human splicing factors and their role in genome wide gene regulation via NMD. Regulation via alternative splicing coupled to NMD requires binding of a splicing factor to the regulated mRNA. CLIP-seq and related studies reveal that splicing factors bind abundantly to all transcripts of our selected 100 splicing factors. In collaboration with Arun Desai, I characterized the network of protein-RNA interactions between splicing factors. I find that splicing factors form a highly-connected network, where 30-60% of all possible interactions between splicing factors and the transcripts encoding splicing factors are observed. Dr. Zhiqiang Hu and I compared the hierarchy of splicing factors to the hierarchy of transcription factors. Dr. Hu calculated hierarchies of transcription and splicing factors using ENCODE ChIP-seq and eCLIP data, applying a hierarchy metric described in Gerstein et al. (Nature 2012 489:91-100). . Our limited data show that the hierarchy among splicing regulators is different from that of transcription factors. Gerstein et al. plot networks in 3 layers, with a top “executive” layer, the bottom under-regulation layer, and a middle layer in between. Unlike transcription factors which concentrate at the extremes of hierarchy metric, splicing factors form a hierarchical network that has nearly uniform distribution of proteins across the hierarchy metric and thus less clearly defined separation into the three distinct layers. Nearly all splicing factors that bind their own transcripts are found in the middle layer. Dr. Courtney French, Dr. Hu, and I combined experimental data and a model for NMD mechanism to identify targets of NMD. I inhibited NMD in HeLa and GM12878 cells via knockdown of UPF1 and SMG6, two core NMD factors, and by exposure to cycloheximide (CHX). Dr. French and Dr. Hu performed RNA-seq data analysis for targets of NMD. We observed that NMD factor knockdown is likely a better method to identify NMD targets than the CHX treatment. We found that approximately 30% of NMD isoforms are shared between HeLa and GM12878, while the reminder are not substantially expressed in the other cell line.




Regulation of Core Splicing Factors by Alternative Splicing and Nonsense-mediated MRNA Decay


Book Description

The majority of human genes are transcribed into a precursor messenger RNA (pre-mRNA) that is processed to produce multiple mRNA variants through alternative splicing. Although alternative splicing is known for its role in generating proteomic diversity, it can also regulate gene expression by introducing premature termination codons that target the spliced transcript for nonsense-mediated mRNA decay (AS-NMD). In order to understand the impact of AS-NMD on gene expression, I performed quantitative AS microarray profiling of NMD-inhibited human cells. Using this system, I address the prevalence, trans-acting factor requirements and the range of cellular functions regulated by AS-NMD. While this pathway had been implicated in homeostatic feedback regulation of genes encoding splicing-regulatory proteins, my results revealed highly conserved alternative exons regulated by AS-NMD in genes encoding basal or 'core' splicing factors. I further characterized one of these exons in the gene encoding SmB/B', and demonstrated that SmB/B' autoregulates its expression through AS-NMD. Furthermore, AS profiling revealed that knockdown of this core splicing factor affects the inclusion levels of additional alternative exons enriched in genes with functions in RNA processing and RNA binding. In summary, my results reveal a role for AS-NMD in regulating the expression of core splicing factors, as well as a role for the core spliceosomal machinery in coordinating a network of alternative exons in RNA processing factor genes.




The mRNA Metabolism in Human Disease


Book Description

The eukaryotic gene expression pathway involves a number of interlinked steps, with messenger RNA (mRNA) being the key intermediate. The precursor mRNA is transcribed from DNA, processed by removal of introns and addition of the cap structure and the poly(A) tail. The mature mRNA is then exported to the cytoplasm where it is translated into protein and finally degraded. In this process, mRNA is associated with RNA-binding proteins forming ribonucleoprotein complexes, whose protein content evolves throughout the lifetime of the mRNA. While the complexity of eukaryotic gene expression allows the production of proteins to be controlled at many levels, it also makes the process vulnerable to errors. Although eukaryotic cells have evolved elaborate mRNA quality control mechanisms that ensure the fidelity of gene expression, some defects are not detected, thus affecting mRNA metabolism. This condition plays a fundamental role in the pathogenesis of several disease processes, such as neurodegeneration and oncogenesis. Besides, exciting recent data have shown that cellular RNAs can be modified post-transcriptionally via dynamic and reversible chemical modifications, the so-called epitranscriptome. These modifications can alter mRNA structure, being able to modulate different steps of the mRNA metabolism that can be associated with various human diseases, such as systemic lupus erythematosus and cancer. This book provides a collection of novel studies and hypotheses aimed to define the pathophysiological consequences of altered mRNA metabolism events in human cells, and is written for a wide spectrum of readers in the field of gene expression regulation. The last chapter highlights how the discovery of disease-causing defects (or modifications) in mRNA can provide a variety of therapeutic targets that can be used for the development of new RNA-based therapeutics. Hopefully, it may also contribute to inspire the drug-developing scientific community.













No Nonsense


Book Description

Gene regulation in eukaryotes is tightly controlled at multiple levels to ensure proper expression and cellular homeostasis. Misregulation of gene expression is a common source of genetic disease. One mechanism by which cells are able to control gene expression is through the synthesis and degradation of the mRNA molecules encoding the genes. The transcription and degradation of mRNA molecules controls the pool mRNAs that are available to the translational machinery. One of the well-studied mRNA decay pathways is the Nonsense-Mediated mRNA Decay pathway (NMD). Originally, NMD was discovered as a posttranscriptional mRNA surveillance mechanism responsible for the deadenylation-independent decapping and rapid 5'→3' degradation of mRNAs that harbor premature termination codons (PTCs). Approximately one-third of all inherited genetic disease and cancers are related to NMD. It is now known that NMD plays a much larger role in the stability and expression of wild-type mRNAs as well. Wild-type mRNAs with NMD-targeting signals, which include 1) a translated uORF, 2) a long 3' UTR, 3) leaky scanning leading to out-of-frame initiation of translation, 3) programmed ribosome frameshift sites, and 5) regulated alternative splicing variants, are rapidly destabilized by NMD. It has also been observed that some wild-type mRNAs contain NMD targeting signals but are not degraded by NMD due to protecting mechanism. Here we show that the SSY5 mRNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is a wild-type mRNA with multiple NMD targeting signals but is not degraded by NMD. None of the current models for NMD protection explain the SSY5 mRNA stability so the mechanism of protection is likely to be novel. Additionally, we show the SSY5 mRNA is primarily degraded 5'→3'. We also explore two additional mRNAs, YAP1 and GCN4, in S. cerevisiae that also contain at least one NMD-targeting signal but are not degraded by NMD. Elucidating the mechanism of protection from NMD of these three mRNAs will provide valuable insight to the underlying molecular mechanisms of NMD, which despite thorough investigation remain unclear. Understanding the molecular intricacies of the NMD pathway will allow for the efficient development of NMD-related disease therapies with minimal risks and side-effects.